User:Wine Guy/Sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General information
Main project page	talk
Participants	talk
Article requests	talk
Articles needing attention	talk
New articles	talk
Project banner	talk
Project category	talk
Christianity Portal	talk
Templates
{{User Anglicanism WikiProject}}
{{Anglicanismproject}}
{{Anglican-stub}}
{{Saint-stub}}
{{bishop-stub}}
{{ArchbishopofCanterbury-stub}}
{{Anglicanism COTM}}
{{AngCOTM}}
{{Anglicanism barnstar}}
{{Anglican orders}}
Infoboxes
{{Anglican Churches}}
{{Archbishops of Canterbury}}
{{Anglicanism project Navigation}}
Departments
Assessment	talk
Collaboration	talk
Outreach	talk
Peer review	talk
Task forces
Archbishops of Canterbury	talk
Liturgy	talk
edit · changes

This page has been created to identify and assess articles related to the Anglicanism WikiProject. This worklist may also be used to identify key articles for use by the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team, who are working toward a set of articles suitable for release in print, CD, DVD, or some combination.

1 How to list articles
2 Legend
3 Key articles
4 Other articles
5 Grading Scheme

[edit] How to list articles

Use this page to identify articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion, and to assess their priority and quality. Feel free to expand the list. When adding an article, please add the template {{Anglicanismproject}} to the articles talk page if it is not already there. If you make an addition or change to the tables below, please add your username and a timestamp in the "updated" column. If you use a non-custom signature, simply use four tildes (~~~~) as you would on any talk page. If you use a custom or personalised signature, please use the simple form [[User:Your_username|Your_username]] followed by five tildes (timestamp), as the custom signature tends to clutter up the table. Thanks.

[edit] Legend

Need: The article's importance, regardless of its quality

Top	Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopaedia
High	Subject contributes a depth of knowledge
Mid	Subject fills in more minor details
Low	Subject is peripheral knowledge, possibly trivial

Quality: current article quality

FA	Featured article
A	Article is well written, reasonably complete and referenced; possible featured article candidate.
GA	This is a good article.
B	We have a decent article, but it needs further editing.
Start	Significant cleanup or expansion needed.
Stub	Article is either a very short, or rough.

Gradings are discussed in detail below.

[edit] Key articles

A key article is defined as an article on a subject considered to be of the highest importance within its field. The quality of the article has no bearing on whether or not an article is defined as "key".

Article	Importance	Quality	Comments	Updated
Anglican Communion	Top	B	Core article of this project. Need a bit of wiki-style touch up to be considered A-class.	Wine Guy 01:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Anglicanism	Top	A	Core article of this project. Comprehensive article which may need minor adjustments for balance and style before being considered for FA status.	Wine Guy 01:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Archbishop of Canterbury	Top	B	Lacking citations. Could use more historical information, and style touch-up.	Wine Guy01:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Lambeth Conferences	Top	Start	Plenty of information, but has been tagged for cleanup since July 2005	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Anglican Consultative Council	Top	Stub	Currently has only a basic overview of the funtion of the ACC, and a list of meeting locations/years.	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Anglican Communion Primates' Meeting	Top	Stub	Currently a two sentence stub.	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Church of England	Top	B	May need to cite more references to be considered GA or A class.	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Thomas Cranmer	Top	B	Needs to cite references, otherwise should be GA class.	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Richard Hooker (theologian)	Top	Start	Needs to be expanded and referenced, also needs style work.	Wine Guy 07:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
English Reformation	Top	B	Looks close to good article status.	Wine Guy 01:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Book of Common Prayer	Top	B	Looks ready for WP:GA consideration.	Wine Guy 01:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Thirty-Nine Articles	Top	Start	Currently being expanded.	Wine Guy 01:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral	Top	Start	Could use expansion, in particular under "Significance".	Wine Guy 01:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Oxford Movement	Top	Start	Needs considerable expansion, as well as editing for style.	Wine Guy 01:51, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Note: English Monarchs Henry VIII and Elizabeth I are of "key" importance to this topic. Both are featured articles and are covered by other WikiProjects.

[edit] Other articles

These lists were primarily created from articles linked from the main Anglicanism article. They are not meant to be a definitive or exhaustive listing, but rather a listing of the more important articles relating to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion.

[edit] People

Article	Importance	Quality	Comments	Updated
Lancelot Andrewes	Top	B	Looks good, may need more about his work on the KJV Bible.	Wine Guy 22:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
George Carey	High	???
Donald Coggan	Mid	???
John Jewel	High	???
John Keble	High	???
Charles Longley	Mid	???
John Henry Newman	High	???
Edward Bouverie Pusey	High	???
Samuel Seabury	Mid	???
Jeremy Taylor	Mid	???
Desmond Tutu	Mid	???
Rowan Williams	Top	???
[[]]	???	???

[edit] Churches of the Communion

Article	Importance	Quality
Church of Bangladesh	Low	Stub
Anglican Church of Canada	Mid	???
Church of North India	Mid	???
Church of South India	Mid	???
Church of Ireland	High	???
Church of Pakistan	Mid	???
Scottish Episcopal Church	Top	???
Episcopal Church in the United States of America	High	???
Church in Wales	High	???
[[]]	???	???

[edit] Doctrine and Theology

Article	Importance	Quality
Anglo-Catholicism	High	???
High church	Mid	???
Low church	Mid	???
[[]]	???	???

[edit] Bishoprics

Article	Importance	Quality
Primus of the Scottish Episcopal Church	High	???
Archbishop of Wales	High	???
Archbishop of York	High	???
[[]]	???	???

[edit] Cathedrals

Article	Importance	Quality
Canterbury Cathedral	High	???
[[]]	???	???
[[]]	???	???
[[]]	???	???

[edit] Grading Scheme

These are the detailed criteria per class/quality division, following the assessment scheme used by the Wikipedia V1.0 Editorial team.

**Article progress grading scheme** **[ v • d • e ]**
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status after peer review, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible.	Sikhism (as of August 2006)
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of June 2006)
GA {{GA-Class}}	The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	Agriculture (as of June 2006)
B {{B-Class}}	Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element such as a standard infobox. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)