William Stephen Raikes Hodson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The factual accuracy of this article or section is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page. |
William Stephen Raikes Hodson (March 10, 1821 - March 11, 1858), known as "Hodson of Hodson's Horse," British leader of irregular light cavalry during the Indian Rebellion of 1857, third son of the Rev. George Hodson, afterwards archdeacon of Stafford and canon of Lichfield, was born at Maisemore Court, near Gloucester.
Contents |
[edit] Early career
He was educated at Rugby and Cambridge, and accepted a cadetship in the Indian army at the advanced age for those days of twenty-three. Joining the 2nd Bengal Grenadiers he went through the first Sikh War, and was present at the battles of Moodkee, Ferozeshah and Sobraon. In one of his letters home at this period he calls the campaign a tissue of mismanagement, blunders, errors, ignorance and arrogance , and outspoken criticism such as this brought him many bitter enemies throughout his career, who made the most of undeniable faults of character. In 1847, through the influence of Sir Henry Lawrence, he was appointed adjutant of the corps of Guides, and in 1852 was promoted to the command of the Guides with the civil charge of Yusafzai. But his brusque and haughty demeanour to his equals made him many enemies.
[edit] Accusations of corruption
In 1855 two separate charges were brought against him. The first was that he had arbitrarily imprisoned a Pathan chief named Khadar Khan, on suspicion of being concerned in the murder of Colonel Mackeson. The man was acquitted, and Lord Dalhousie removed Hodson from his civil functions and remanded him to his regiment on account of his lack of judgment. The second charge was more serious, amounting to an accusation of malversation in the funds of his regiment. He was tried by a court of inquiry, who found that his conduct to natives had been unjustifiable and oppressive, that he had used abusive language to his native officers and personal violence to his men, and that his system of accounts was calculated to screen peculation and fraud. Subsequently another inquiry was carried out by Major Reynell Taylor, which dealt simply with Hodson's accounts and found them to be an honest and correct record irregularly kept. The other charges against him seem to have been dropped, with ominous implications for his future role during the Mutiny. At this time the Guides were split up into numerous detachments, and there was a system of advances which made the accounts very complicated. The verdicts of the two inquiries may beset against each other, and this particular charge declared not proven. It is possible that Hodson was careless and extravagant in money matters rather than actually dishonest; but there were several similar charges against him. During a tour through Kashmir with Sir Henry Lawrence he kept the purse and Sir Henry could never obtain an account from him; subsequently Sir George Lawrence accused him of embezzling the funds of the Lawrence Asylum at Kasauli; while Sir Neville Chamberlain in a published letter says of the third brother, Lord Lawrence, "I am bound to say that Lord Lawrence had no opinion of Hodson's integrity in money matters. He has often discussed Hodson's character in talking to me, and it was to him a regret that a man possessing so many fine gifts should have been wanting in a moral quality which made him untrustworthy." Finally, on one occasion Hodson spent £500 of the pay due to Lieutenant Godby, and under threat of exposure was obliged to borrow the money from a local banker named Bisharat Ali through one of his officers.
[edit] Outbreak of the Mutiny
It was just at the time when Hodson's career seemed ruined that the Indian Mutiny broke out, and he obtained the opportunity of rehabilitating himself. At the very outset of the campaign he made his name by riding with despatches from General Anson at Karnal to Meerut and back again, a distance of 152 miles in all, in seventy-two hours, through a country swarming with the rebel cavalry. This feat so pleased the commander-in-chief that he empowered him to raise a regiment of 2,000 irregular horse, which became known to fame as Hodson's Horse, and placed him at the head of the Intelligence Department.
In his double role of cavalry leader and intelligence officer, Hodson played a large part in the reduction of Delhi and consequently in saving India for the British Empire. He was the finest swordsman in the army, and contemporaries considered him possessed of a daring recklessness which is the most useful quality of leadership. In explanation of the fact that he never received the Victoria Cross, either during the Mutiny or posthumously, it was said of him that it was because he earned it every day of his life. It may also have been, however, because of the reputation he and his irregular cavalry earned for brutality, cruelty and ruthlessness in the suppression of the Mutiny, which became an embarrassment to the Government of India in the period of reconstruction after 1858. Hodson's horse were prominent in the reign of terror unleashed on Oudh after the discovery of the massacres at Cawnpore had inflamed British opinion. Many innocent villagers were hanged on suspicion of being mutineers, and a spirit of revenge led to numerous atrocities. Hodson's personal inclination to violence is also documented. Reference has already been made to Bisharat Ali, who had lent Hodson money. During the Siege of Delhi another native, said to be an enemy of Bisharat Ali's, informed Hodson that he had turned rebel and had just reached Khurkhouda, a village near Delhi. Hodson thereupon took out a body of his sowars, attacked the village, and shot Bisharat Ali and several of his relatives. General Crawford Chamberlain states that this was Hodson's way of wiping out the debt.
[edit] Bahadur Shah and the Mughal Princes
Again, after the fall of Delhi, Hodson obtained from General Wilson permission to ride out with fifty horsemen to Humayun's tomb, 6 miles south of Delhi (at that time consisting solely of the walled city of Shahjahanabad), and bring in Bahadur Shah Zafar, the last of the Moghuls. This he did with safety in the face of a large and threatening crowd, and thus dealt the mutineers a heavy blow. On the following day with 100 horsemen he went out to the same tomb and obtained the unconditional surrender of the three princes, who had been left behind on the previous occasion. A crowd of 6,000 persons gathered, and Hodson ordered them to disarm, which they proceeded to do. He sent the princes on with an escort of ten men, while with the remaining ninety he collected the arms of the crowd. On galloping after the princes Hodson claimed he found the crowd once more pressing on the escort and threatening an attack; and fearing that he would be unable to bring his prisoners into Delhi he shot them with his own hand. This is the most bitterly criticised action of his career, and divided his contemporaries, some condemning him, whilst others argued that Hodson, as the man on the spot, could best judge what was necessary to handle the crowd; it was also widely believed that one of the princes, Abu Bukt, heir-apparent to the throne, had made himself notorious for his cruelty and had committed atrocities against the British during the massacres at Delhi. However, there were many exaggerated (and fabricated) accounts of both British and Indian and atrocities which circulated widely after the discovery of the (very real) atrocities at Cawnpore, and it is unlikely that much credence can be lent to them. Hodson's act can be seen as one of "irregular justice", or simply as murder. Opinion remains divided on the subject, as it was in the immediate aftermath of the Mutiny. A more unpleasant side to the question is that he gave the Mughal Emperor himself a safe conduct, which was afterwards seen by Sir Donald Stewart, before he left the palace, and presumably in return for a bribe; he also took an armlet and rings from the bodies of the princes. He was freely accused of looting at the time, and though this charge, like that of peculation, is matter for controversy, it is very strongly supported. General Pelham Burn said that he saw loot in Hodson's boxes when he accompanied him from Fatehgarh to take part in the siege of Lucknow, and Sir Henry Daly said that he found "loads of loot" in Hodson's boxes after his death, and also a file of documents relating to the Guides case, which had been stolen from him and of which Hodson denied all knowledge.
On the other hand the Rev. G Hodson states in his book that he obtained the inventory of his brother's possessions made by the Committee of Adjustment and it contained no articles of loot, and Sir Charles Gough, president of the committee, confirmed this evidence. This statement is totally incompatible with Sir Henry Daly's and is only one of many contradictions in the case. Sir Henry Norman stated that to his personal knowledge Hodson remitted several thousand pounds to Calcutta which could only have been obtained by looting. On the other hand, again, Hodson died a poor man, his effects were sold for £170, his widow was dependent on charity for her passage home, was given apartments by the Queen at Hampton Court, and left only £400 at her death.
[edit] Subsequent controversy
Hodson was killed on 11 March 1858 in the attack on the Begum Kothi at Lucknow. He had just arrived on the spot and met a man going to fetch powder to blow in a door; instead Hodson, with his usual recklessness, rushed into the doorway and was shot. It is said that the sepoy who had the gun never aimed at him, he limped towards the crowd and vanished; rumour has it, it was Tamerlane the great, back for the last time before the end to the Imperial Dynasty.
On the whole, it can hardly be doubted that he was a bold and ruthless soldier who rendered valuable services to the British Empire: even his contemporaries, however, were sometimes shocked by his violent behaviour and questioned his honesty, and to later generations many of his actions seem entirely unjustified.
The controversy relating to Hodson's moral character is very complicated and unpleasant. Upon Hodson's side see Rev. G Hodson, Hodson of Hodson's Horse (1883), and LJ Trotter, A Leader of Light Horse (1901) ; against him, R Bosworth-Smith, Life of Lord Lawrence, appendix to the 6th edition of 1885; TR Holmes, History of the Indian Mutiny, appendix N to the 5th edition of 1898, and Four Famous Soldiers by the same author, 1889; and General Sir Crawford Chamberlain, Remarks on Captain Trotter's Biography of Major WSR Hodson (1901).
This article incorporates text from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain.
