User talk:William Graham/Archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Talk archives

  • Archive 1

Contents


[edit] A welcome from Sango123

Hello, William Graham/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy Wiki-ing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

[edit] Re:Spammer

Thanks for the warning. I have gone through and reverted most of their edits. I'll write them a stern note, and if they continue they might have to be blocked from editing. - SimonP 17:37, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Spamming

openDemocracy is a not-for-profit organisation which operates under a creative commons license as Wikipedia does. http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-copyrightlaw/creativecommons_2596.jsp

It is not a commercial site and has several links to Wikipedia. We are big supporters of the Wikipedia project. Please see here: http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-accountability/wikipedia_2882.jsp

I was not aware of any problem with Wikipedia before and had not been informed of your message in August. I hope this will not mean openDemocracy links cannot appear on Wikipedia as there are usually several links to online publishers such as the BBC, CNN and Washington Post attached to articles and current events.

Please inform.

Regards Maz

[edit] User 130.76.64.16

Thanks for the message about User:130.76.64.16. I now warned him again on his talk page. He had enough warnings now and could probably be blocked. But I'm not an admin, and if the problem persists, he should be noted on a page like WP:Vandalism in progress. Kefalonia 17:40, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Plattsburgh

Hi William,

Thank you for the response. I graduated Plattsburgh State in 2001, and have recently been updating the things I know. The PSTV entry was made by webmaster of PSTValumni.com. I recently tweaked some thing in the WQKE section, especially concerning the former call letters of WPLT.

I discovered Wikipedia a few months ago, and I love it! Good luck with the new semester.

--Ian

[edit] Eduardo Saverin

Thanks for reverting me. I went to facebook.com, didn't see his name, and just reverted out of habit. So again, thanks for doing some more research and reinstating it. I'm just so used to seeing BS put into that article. Mike H. That's hot 07:37, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for reaching out

It'll probably be a user conduct RfC, then wind up in ArbCom. Thanks for reaching out with your support, and I'll keep you posted regarding any moves towards this end. Have a good day! -- User:RyanFreisling @ 15:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

No worries. It's very easy when the behavior is so obvious. Thanks for your support. I'm gonna relax for a while, if you think of anything to add that will help others come to their best informed judgment, go for it! -- User:RyanFreisling @ 00:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Green Lantern

Thanks. I've added the heading for some of them (others had them added by other editors, or are too short to merit it, IMO), but I'm still not very adept at the template thing. If you know how to do that, I woudl recommend that you do so. Thanks. :-) Nightscream 04:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RfC

You might as well go to WP:RfC, and read up. Chech my userpage...I generally hate RfC and don't like ot talk about it or be much of a part of it. RfC is just a semi-formal discussion with evidence to back it up so as to get a "consensus" on what to do. It is not really binding...so the user in question could just ignore it. Still, it will carry weight if this has to go to arbcom. Anyone can comment...as the point of RfC is to include the accused...the accusers and outsiders. Hope that helps.Voice of AllT|@|ESP 16:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please Stop Deleting My Board From Keith Olbermann

There is no rational basis for deleting that link line for Olbermann. It is a valid reference. I understand your "literal" interpretation of a problematic rule, but that rule needs to be altered as well, becasue it leads to this sort of problem. It is easier to destroy than build, what you are doing is wrong. Thank you.

[edit] facebook

I kinda foolishly started over the facebook voting debate at Talk:Facebook_(website)#Voting (because there were some comments like waffle iron's that weren't clear whether or not they were voting and for what). I have now realized that not everyone who commented before may have had it on their watchlist so I am sending this to anyone that commented earlier and has not yet (re)voted. Sorry. --L1AM 07:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

FOr reverting the vandalism on my user page. --Pilotguy (talk ¦ ✉) 21:27, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting Articles

Please do your research before marking AfD, as you would've found Pure Pwnage's all ready voted keep twice. Thanks. 72.150.8.234 13:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC) (forgot to sign before)

More like do your research about the topic rather than just taking one look at it and then marking it as non notable fan cruft with zero evidence to back it all up. The show, like any other show, is popular and well known with their own comic strip and such. I fail to see your justification for labelling it cruft and non notable, especially after it had already been voted to keep the article and not delete it. Thanks. —This unsigned comment was added by 129.128.67.23 (talk • contribs) .

He's just left-handed, and left-handed people can make silly things happen! :) --84.249.252.211 22:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/l/User_talk%7EWilliam_Graham_Archive1_1cfc.html"