Talk:Wilton Mall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 1/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
I deleted this because it's a shopping mall. There are millions of buildings and malls in the world, few of them have any significance. In the interest of Wikipedia not being an indiscriminate list of trivia, I don't think we should encourage this sort of thing. Thoughts? Friday (talk) 14:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Can we talk about the merits of the article instead of arguing procedure? I don't want to list this on the already overcrowded and dysfunctional Afd if there's a way to avoid it. Friday (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- People are working on this page, and so I don't think it's appropriate to just blank the page on them based on your personal opinion. Is XD still alive anyway? There are better and more adopted mechanisms like prod going these days, and a sample of the XD7 category indicate you are virtually alone. I think there is enough here that a reasonable article could be built including historical information, etc. I would label it as a stub and move on. However, I would not vote against deletion. I just think your blanking of the page is presumptuous, particularly when it's replaced after a user edits it. cmh 15:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- Alright, no arguments here. The only reason I re-XD'd is it that no explanation was offered at all against the argument for deletion. In fact, I still haven't heard any arguments against deletion. This appears to be Just Another Mall, same as millions of others in the world. There's nothing to be said about it except for trivia. Friday (talk) 15:20, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
- People are working on this page, and so I don't think it's appropriate to just blank the page on them based on your personal opinion. Is XD still alive anyway? There are better and more adopted mechanisms like prod going these days, and a sample of the XD7 category indicate you are virtually alone. I think there is enough here that a reasonable article could be built including historical information, etc. I would label it as a stub and move on. However, I would not vote against deletion. I just think your blanking of the page is presumptuous, particularly when it's replaced after a user edits it. cmh 15:14, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
