Talk:William Sledd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Deletion

I disagree with the deletion proposal. Having witnessed William Sledd's rise to fame on Youtube I believe he is notable enough for an article. He does generate a lot of hits and currently has thousands of subscribers. People do know who he is and I myself had looked here for any articles on Sledd a while back.--Arislan 18:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. I don't think this article should be deleted.JudahH 16:20, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree, this article should remain. --DavidRWilson 23:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Same here. He's certainly a minor celebrity, at least enough that some people have gone here and commented on this. --69.12.143.197 04:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

• Don't worry this and all other YouTube celebs articles will remain. This is since recently an a big article on famous YouTubers was deleted with the claim that a seprt article should be written on each celeb. 82.39.9.197 12:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

If you want to keep this, I suggest you use a more relevant wiki, such as the Internet Wikia, where non-encyclopedic internet "celebrities" and websites can be written about. Angela. 17:04, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

William Sledd's YouTube series may be published at some point. I'd say that he would be eligible for a page at that point. But if [Smosh] is deemed worthy of their own wiki page due to their fame on YouTube, so should William Sledd. And Nick Andrews (Creator of 'My Hand are Bananas'). Where do you draw the line?—The preceding MouseWeed comment was added by 24.86.134.116 (talk) 02:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Restoration

FrummerThanThou (talk • contribs) has requested that I restore this article, citing several promising sources that could quite possibly secure the subject's notability. I've restored the article's full history (warts and all) in the hope that we can get a worthwhile article out of this. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

What is the relevance of this article? I mean especially the last part of the article is like reading a lab-book in which someone noted down what he did. That isnt exactly relevant??? Everything which should be posted on wikipedia should have educational value. Maybe someday this kid has its own show, then you might make a biography of him, but its too early for this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.56.155.7 (talk • contribs).

Why the anonymous post? No account? --Arislan 10:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)