Talk:William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Since the current Lord Hartington was known as "Bill Burlington" before his grandfather's death, could we not put him at Bill Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington and have the past Lord Hartington at William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington (with prominent links between them, of course)? Proteus (Talk) 22:00, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move I guess. Duja► 09:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

William John Robert Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington → William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington — shorten name Phoe 09:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add  * '''Support'''  or  * '''Oppose'''  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

  • Support as author. Phoe 09:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. Sensible. - Kittybrewster 10:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak support, see discussion. Mackensen (talk) 11:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

I think the disambiguation page William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington is not really needed, we can do the same on William Cavendish (disambiguation). In the future William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington (photographer) will become 13th Duke of Devonshire, making it necessary to move his article to William Cavendish, 13th Duke of Devonshire - and making the disambiguation superfluous anyway. I hope I have expressed myself clearly enough. :-) Phoe 09:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

To avoid errors we can add dablinks on the respective articles additionally: in example For the heir-apparent of the 12th Duke of Devonshire see.... Phoe 09:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Add any additional comments:

Note that about two years ago Proteus (talk • contribs) suggested something similar (but a little more elegant) at Talk:William Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington. Mackensen (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Elegance is not my thing - I am already glad if one understands me at all. Phoe 11:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
What I meant was that his suggestion avoided parenthetical disambiguation by locating one article at Bill Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington–apparently he was almost universally known as such. Mackensen (talk) 11:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
This then would be an additional and in my meaning usefull move. Phoe 11:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Is there any official rule on the titles of articles of heirs of peers? Laura1822 03:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

  • The usual rules apply. If they've got a courtesey title we include it. It's tucked away somewhere. Mackensen (talk) 11:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] And now...

OK people, I moved the page, but someone who's able to make something out of these numerous Bill Cavendishes should also:

  1. Find another appropriate title for William Cavendish. That W.C. doesn't seem to be the "primary" one at first glance. Note that "what links here" for him usually wasn't meant to refer to him.
  2. Ergo, William Cavendish (disambiguation) should be moved to William Cavendish.
  3. Please check out what I did at William Cavendish (disambiguation)
  4. Someone should sort out Special:Whatlinkshere/William Cavendish

If the practice is that the ancestor of the family (W.C. the courtier) gets the undisambiguated title, please forget #1 and #2. Duja► 09:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

It's done ~~ Phoe talk 15:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC) ~~
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/l/Talk%7EWilliam_Cavendish%2C_Marquess_of_Hartington_dfed.html"