Wikipedia talk:WikiProject user warnings/Archives/2005/November
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is a discussion archive created in November 2005, though the comments contained may not have been posted on this date. Please do not post any new comments on this page. See current discussion, or the archives index. |
[edit] Praise
[edit] Good job
It's looking great. Wikibofh 20:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. // Pathoschild 13:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Very nice idea
Its always great to have boilerplates when dealing with sticky situations -- promotes equalness of response and easier tracking later should the issue by disputed. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 14:49, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Notoriety
This looks very interesting. I wish I could contribute, but in the near future I can't. Still, one oddity caught my eye: Intent: warns against adding information about subjects judged insufficiently notorious to merit an encyclopedic entry. Er, come again? I understand that Adolf Hitler (most extreme) to Mariah Carey's worst ever album (far from the most extreme) are notorious enough to deserve articles, but when I look at what happens to be on the main page right now I see Felice Beato, [Black Tree Fern]], etc.: where's the notoriety? (Do you mean renown, perhaps?) -- Hoary 14:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- A more accurate term would be 'notable' (see: Wikipedia:Notability); thanks for contributing. ;) // Pathoschild 15:22, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Looks interesting...
How can I help? --FireFox ™ 17:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Feel free to take initiative. I've updated the Tasks list and added a Misc. Help section; those may give you some ideas for contributing. // Pathoschild 20:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- Should I add myself to the particpants list? --FireFox ™ 18:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Feel free. ;) // Pathoschild 22:42, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- Should I add myself to the particpants list? --FireFox ™ 18:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
