Wikipedia:Wikipedians/World citizens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of Wikipedians who are world citizens.
This page is for all those who:
- do not want to be categorized by any artificial categories
-
- and/or
- wish to identify themselves first and foremost as human beings and then by any groupings to which they proudly belong.
This page is also for those who:
- work for a reformed, strengthened, yet sufficiently decentralized United Nations which represents and responds to the will of the people of the world and adheres to the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, similar to a federal system on the national scale
-
- and/or
- work toward other developments to strengthen a common identity and harmony between our fellow world citizens on the planet, while respecting legitimate local and national loyalties and diversity.
World citizens are not limited to any specific faith or ideology, other than the following:
Contents |
[edit] Beliefs
- freedom from all national, racial, and religious prejudices
- belief in the basic equality of all genders
[edit] Support for
- democratic globalization
- elimination of poverty
- a globally, democratically endorsed international auxiliary language
- uniform system of weights and measures
- universal currency
- universal education
- universal health care
[edit] Wikipedian world citizens
- Bananaclaw 10:03, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Brettz9
- Robin Patterson (New Zealand)
- Cyprus2k1 (European Union / Portuguese)
- Daniel (America)
- O.T. Ford — a united world, yes, but not this United Nations
- Shorne—but I don't like international auxiliary languages; the real languages are far more beautiful and interesting
- -- Grunt ҈ 01:48, 2004 Oct 11 (UTC) (Canada)
- Ingoolemo
- Gurmeet S. Kochar (India)
- \Mikez 16:46, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC) (Sweden)
- Renato M. Sousa (Brazil)
- Andre (talk) 00:58, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
- Ashibaka ✎ Everything but the auxiliary language bit. But I would rather place myself on the "world citizen" list than the "wannabe world citizen" list.
- Nick Moss (New Zealand/Australia)
- Ott (Estonia/Tallinn also Saaremaa)
- Frank Pennycook (Britain, future republic of) All the above, except is there room for negotiation on weights and measures? I would like to continue to read my bodyweight in stone. Thank you.
- eliZZZa
- Mo (talk)
- TheNewAuk (United States)
- Trilobite (European Union/England) Think I agree with all of that.
- –– Constafrequent (talk page) 08:40, 26 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Nightstallion (EU-Austria) I'd request an opt-out from auxiliary languages, as well. Well, at least leave the existing languages just as they are, linguistics are just too much fun to eliminate this field of science completely. ;)
- utcursch | talk
- Jmfayard : European Union-France/Germany, mondo-civitano
- LambaJan Yes! Especially with the international auxiliary language! but none of the existing ones. they're hard for non-native-western-language speakers to learn.
- Snakes
[edit] Sympathiser (admit part of the agenda)
- Grutness (New Zealander)
- Pgreenfinch (European Union / French)
- Straal (European Union/Belgian)
- Dante Alighieri | Talk (United States)
- Amerika All for everything but elimination of poverty. God, I love poverty! (Sarcasm)
- Tatteredpaper | Talk (United States) (Worldwide education? Nah. I'll pass.)
- Tripter (talk)
- ~shuri (English)
- uriel (European Union)
- jaxhere (Canada) I'm not likely to accept any program carte blanche, and I may even deny being a world citizen at some time if I feel the lable puts me in some category with other persons who have ideas which significantly differ from my own.