Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Newsroom/May 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Suggestions

  • I think it's also time to declare to the arrival of Wikipedia in the popular press. A Lexis-Nexus search of all minimally notable hometown newspapers in just the US for Wikipedia either as a subject, source, or passing by reference in only the last 6 months yields 211 results (this does not include the newspapers of some ~1800 colleges in this country), and all ther other recognition such as the 100+ mentions/source/subject law review & law journals articles in the past years. From repeated citiations about the papacy by the LA Times to chess tournaments by the Omaha World-Journal - it might be worth mentioning that the task of documenting these mentions in the wikipedia as a press source document is now hopelessly overrun. Lotsofissues 13:08, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • The positive LA Times commentary today also revealed a small organized half attempt by a right wing blog to vandialize wikipedia. The blog has moved on and I don't want to renew attention to the site. The Times mention already informed enough people for what was a minor effort. Let's pass over mentioning the blog too. Lotsofissues 01:21, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
Is there any more information about this anywhere? Worldtraveller 19:41, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Looks like very little fanfare over this. Sorry wouldn't know. :-| Lotsofissues 17:17, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep an eye on WikiNews TV and report when they go live. - Mgm|(talk) 17:53, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC) (DV left)
  • Mailing-list threads : HTML email?? horrors (hanging)
    • Bambara Wikipedia launched on Wednesday... (postponed)
Brockhaus has removed the article from their web site. more press and more blogs

[edit] Press

  • Jimbo is created a fellow of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School [1] -- Lotsofissues 01:24, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
    Now ncluded in 'wikipedian meeting' notes.
  • Wikipedia was featured in the newspaper comic strip FoxTrot on May 7th, which should mean a very widespread 'press coverage'. The articles mentioned experienced some bursts of nonsense, and one of them was briefly protected from editing.