Wikipedia:WikiProject Meteorology/Collaboration
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Collaboration on articles helps speed up the creation and improvement of articles. Please feel free to inform others in the Meteorology Project about work you are starting, wish collaboration on or seek peer review for.
Contents |
[edit] 1) Topics we are currently working on
This is a list of projects and articles we are currently working on.
- Anticyclone - working to improve to B class (minimum)
- Cyclogenesis - working to improve to GA standard
- Cyclone - working to improve to GA class
- Evansville Tornado of November 2005 (Failed FAC Discussion page) - working to improve to FA class
- Tornado - working to improve to GA standard
[edit] 2) Request for collaboration
This is a list of pages being worked upon where individuals would appreciate the active help of others in discussing and developing an article.
London Tornado of 2006 - 7th December 2006
[edit] 3) Articles for review
[edit] List of articles currently listed at Wikipedia:Peer review
The following articles are listed for peer review at WP:PR. You can help improve these articles by viewing the comments left by reviewers and repairing flaws in the articles, or by giving kind and appreciative feedback to the reviewers on what's happening to the article in response to the review process.
[edit] List of articles requesting internal review
This is a list of recently completed pages that request review for factual/design/completeness reasons by other members of the project
[edit] Articles for assesment
[edit] Current list of articles officially nominated (GA/FAC candidates)
This list of articles is currently listed for official WP assessment against GA or FAC criteria. You may be able to help by looking at any comments and improving the articles in response to the assessment process.
- Cyclogenesis 14 November 2006
- Climate of Minnesota 27 November 2006
- Weather lore 28 November 2006
[edit] List of articles requesting internal (re)assessment
The following articles currently require an internal assessment or reassessment