Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Singapore/Closed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 06:10, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Maris Stella High School

This page has it source from text taken from the school website

• http://schools.moe.edu.sg/mshs/history.htm

I have recieved a complaint at OTRS about this from a teacher from that school about this article. Ticket#: 2006072010009215 Deletion is requested becuase of copyright reasons. --Walter 16:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep but removal of copyrighted text. Molerat 16:33, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. -- Kimchi.sg 16:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep after reducing to a stub. Golfcam 19:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep after reducing to a stub per [1]. Themindset 20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Replace content with a {{copyvio}} template, as per the usual procedure. :-) — RJH (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like it has been cleaned up nicely. I don't have any issue with certain institutions, such as Secondary Schools, getting a default status of notable, given that they meet some basic criteria. (Geographic locations appear to receive similar treatment.) Since we don't have such an agreed criteria, I'll just keep using my own for now. In this case my preference is keep. Thank you. :-) — RJH (talk) 18:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep clearly established precedent and consensus over the past 2 years not to delete high school articles on wikipedia.--Nicodemus75 02:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - --Klemen Kocjancic 06:15, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as I think it was just the history that was a copyvio, which has been removed. If there's still a copyvio, then please put the {{copyvio}} tag in place.. --Rob 06:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Just another school. -- GWO
• Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep. Just another obviously notable school. Silensor 07:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Delete, which pretty much means that my argument is pointless. WP:SCHOOL is not a policy, and the words "high school" don't make a school notable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 09:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
• keep and please help reduce systemic bias this singapore high school is important Yuckfoo 16:44, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as above to help reduce the systemic bias against high schools in general on Wikipedia. Capit 17:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep ^^ -- Librarianofages 02:34, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and allow for organic growth. Secondary schools are notable, WP:SCHOOL not becoming policy is irrelevant to that point. Bahn Mi 21:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SgForums

Non-notable forum, with Alexa rank of 50,853. Fails WP:WEB, prod contested. Delete. Kimchi.sg 15:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. -- Kimchi.sg 15:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, article fails WP:WEB, not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 15:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. PresN 15:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and I wonder why this has been around for eight months. (Although to be honest, I've noticed the moniker "SGpedian" a bit around here, and suspect a lot of sg fans are here editing Wikipedia.) - Che Nuevara: ^{Join the Revolution} 18:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of YOUR OPINIONS} 10:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NUS High Gavel Club

Apparently a non-notable club. Very few, if any, results on Google. Kalani ^[talk] 04:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NN --Alphachimp ^talk 05:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete highly NN - clubs within schools as a general rule have no notability. Any noteworthy accolades or fame can usually be attributed to the school itself, if there is an article for it. Jammo (SM247) 06:01, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, high school clubs aren't notable. --Coredesat 07:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 08:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Lemonsawdust 08:38, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- HS clubs aren't notable -- MrDolomite 14:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge summary with NUS High School of Mathematics and Science, as student clubs/CCAs are not notable just by themselves. Advanced 19:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. - Advanced 19:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable club. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 04:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 07:48, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] National Police Cadet Corps/Dragon & Lion Dance Troupe

Two extracurricular activities at a school (apparently in Hong Kong); school clubs are nonnotable in themselves NawlinWiki 02:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete I would have suggested Merge with the school entry but there doesn't seem to be one! BlueValour 02:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. --Coredesat 07:39, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn. use of first-person plural in text ("Our skills...") suggests advertising, vanity. Tychocat 09:23, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Nanyang Girls' High School. The school is actually in Singapore, and the clubs are not notable in themselves. Lots of Singapore schools have these student organisations. Kimchi.sg 10:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletions. -- Kimchi.sg 10:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. *drew 11:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 15:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Barely notable.--Auger Martel 10:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not Notable, NPOV, being in first person, and sounds like advertising. Advanced 15:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advert-like page about two not-notable extra-curricular activities within a single school. (Not even worth merging with the school's page since there's nothing particularly notable about these two activities at the school.) Singopo 07:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.