Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Peer review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The peer review department of the China WikiProject conducts peer review of articles on request. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on.
All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the China WikiProject. While there is a general intent to expand this process to allow for review by subject experts, the preparations for this are not yet complete.
Contents |
[edit] Instructions
[edit] Requesting a review
- Add
peer-review=yes
to the {{WPCHINA}} project banner at the top of the article's talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax). - From there, click on the "request has been made" link that appears in the template. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article.
- Place
=== [[Name of nominated article]] ===
at the top. - Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (
~~~~
). - Add
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
at the top of the list of requests on this page.
[edit] Responding to a request
Everyone is encouraged to comment on any request listed here. To comment on an article, please add a new section (using ==== [[User:Your name|Your name]] ====
) for your comments, in order to keep multiple responses legible.
[edit] Archiving
Reviews should be archived after they have been inactive for some time, or when the article is nominated as a featured article candidate. To archive a review:
- Replace
peer-review=yes
withold-peer-review=yes
in the {{WPCHINA}} project banner template at the top of the article's talk page - Move
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject China/Peer review/Name of nominated article}}
from this page to the current archive page.
[edit] Requests
[edit] Battle of Wuhan
This article was a stub with three sentences before I expanded it in July. I currently want to do further research & writing on this topic, and was hoping to get some peer reviews first for the article. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites) 04:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Off to a good start. Lots of things to work on:
- More citations throughout (ideally from reputable historical works more so than from primary sources).
- Massive wikification would be appropriate; most of the units in question should (eventually) get their own articles.
- The list of commanders in the infobox seems somewhat excessive; I'd trim it down to the major ones only.
- The lead should grow in proportion to the article, reaching an eventual length of three or four paragraphs.
Overall, though, the most important thing is simply to add more material. This is obviously a major battle, and I'm guessing that there are enough sources available to expand the article significantly. Keep up the great work! Kirill Lokshin 02:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- This is improved, but still needs some work. It was one of the most significant battles of the second Sino-Japanese War, and can still use more detail. It also needs heavy citation througout. However, it is vastly improved, and I don't want to discourage an editor who put a great amount of effort into this! You have gotten mostly there - do on and finish it up! old windy bear 15:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)