Template talk:Wikipedialang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives:
- Archive 1 (1 March 2004–2 January 2005)
- Archive 2 (2 January 2005–29 January 2005)
- Archive 3 (9 Feb 2005–7 July 2006)
[edit] Bosnian wikipedia
Few minutes ago, the Bosnian Wikipedia reached article no. 10.000! Could someone (administrators) change the template? Thank you! :) --Kahriman 21:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Armenian
The link for Armenian Wikipedia should read: "Հայերեն (Armenian)" -- currently, it reads "Main Page [in Armenian] (Armenian)". —this is messedrocker
(talk)
06:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it was fixed. Thank you. —
this is messedrocker
(talk)
06:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)- Thanks, MessedRocker and IceKarma. --DanielNuyu 06:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 10000+
I think the links to 10000+ article other language Wikipedias should be added again. If there is any point to this section, then such Wikipedias are of sufficient size to be included.
zoney ♣ talk 16:09, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. Many previous debates have determined that users feel these others should be listed. Other data has shown that traffic for other Wikipedias declines when they are removed from the front page. Please return them. Tfine80 16:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
One massive list o' links is useless for readers. Nobody is going to try to skim through them to find what they're looking for. The current list is nice and short, just like the lists on other Wikipedias. If people want to see 10,000+, they simply click on Complete List. — BRIAN0918 • 2006-07-29 17:30
[edit] Changes needed
The following Wikipedias now have enough articles to put them in a different section:
- Slovak (sk; Slovenčina) has over 50,000
- Georgian (ka; Kartuli) has over 10,000
Also, since the order seems to be by the languages' transliterated native names, the following changes should probably be made:
- Japanese (Nihongo) should appear after Dutch (Nederlands)
- Serbian under "S" (Srpski)
- Korean (Hangugeo) after Hebrew (‘Ivrit)
- Simple English under either "S" or "E" (but not first)
- If Simple English is placed under "S", then Thai (Phasa Thai) would come before it.
- Greek (Ellinika) after Estonian (Eesti)
- The name for the Neapolitan language is Nnapulitano; I think napulitana is an adjective.
Ardric47 23:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Also, the Vietnamese Wikipedia has just reached 10,000 articles, enough to be relisted. Please add the following code at the end of the 10,000+ list:
'''·''' [[:vi:|Tiếng Việt]]
Thanks.
– Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 16:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Please capitalize the Tiếng in Tiếng Việt, to be consistent. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 00:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- The languages were "offically" ordered by domain name. This gets horribly confused by admins adding items in either by the English name for a language or the name for itself. If people are OK with this change, please change Wikipedia:Main Page FAQ#Why aren't the languages of the other Wikipedia language editions in alphabetical order? as appropriate. Thanks, BT 13:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 100,000 reloaded
The change was requested several times, here's the next one. That's how it looks today:
This Wikipedia is written in English. Started in 2001, it currently contains 1,362,174 articles. Many other Wikipedias are available; the largest are listed below.
- More than 50,000 articles:
Deutsch · Español · Esperanto · Français · Italiano · Nederlands · 日本語 · Norsk bokmål · Polski · Português · Русский · Slovenčina · Suomi · Svenska · 中文
Some numbers from today (bold entries would even qualify for a 250,000 articles category):
459,456 articles in Deutsch 148,947 articles in Español 57,088 articles in Esperanto 355,005 articles in Français 192,296 articles in Italiano 224,505 articles in Nederlands 252,788 articles in 日本語 73,613 articles in Norsk bokmål 289,582 articles in Polski 176,492 articles in Português 103,889 articles in Русский 56,247 articles in Slovenčina 76,816 articles in Suomi 181,479 articles in Svenska 86,719 articles in 中文
As I've written in the discussion of the main page (from where I was forwarded to this discussion page), it's true that all these Wikipedias technichally are over 50,000 articles, but then again the current categories are lowering (POV-like) the work of all the editors of the other Wikipedias. A WP with 10,000 good articles in fact is better than a WP with 100,000 stubs, but that's not the point of my request here. It looks just _so_ wrong to display the ~1.5 million articles of the English WP next to "over 50,000" articles of the German, French, Polish and Japanese (just to mention the 4 biggest Non-English) WPs. --32X 15:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- To give an extra motivation to edit the template: "[[:pt:| Português]]" includes a space where it shouldn't be. ;) --32X 15:36, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- It should be noted that the Spanish Wikipedia lists the sizes of other wikipedias by 100,000 and 10,000 - as do the Latin Wikipedia, Portugese Wikipedia, and others. --Tim4christ17 talk 13:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Danish > 50,000
The Danish Wikipedia just reached its 50,000th article. --pred 22:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- {{editprotected}}--81.161.184.111 05:21, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hello! I elevated the link several hours ago (in response to a message posted on the main page). —David Levy 05:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Need Updation
Telugu Wikpedia has 10,000+ articles. It is not in the list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shyam Bihari (talk • contribs) 07:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC).
- I've added Telugu to the list. —David Levy 07:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tagging non-English words
Hello, I'm currently working at the Wikipedia:Accessibility project, and one of the requirements of web accessibility is to specify the language of non-English words with the HTML lang attribute. This is also useful for let the browser to choose high-quality fonts for specific languages (see Template talk:lang#Justification for more details).
Almost every link to other Wikipedias is a non-English word, so they should be tagged using the {{lang}} template. Please, find a ready made version in one of my subpages: User:Suruena/wikipedialang. Thanks! --surueña 14:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- I brought this to the bottom to re-open discussion. Was there any objection to this or did it just not get done by anyone. The goal seems laudable as long as that's the right way to do it we should. As a somewhat related note, Suruena's version includes the English name of each language, which after reading all the related discussion from the main page talk archives I could find no support for. The main page is in English and an English speaker should be able to at least know what language is in the list so they can go look it up and read about it if they want. తెలుగు means nothing to anyone that doesn't know the script, but at least with Telugu they can go read Telugu. - Taxman Talk 14:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Arabic Wikipedia, 20000 articles
Arabic Wikipedia has reached 20,000 Articles, please update here and in interwikis template. Thanks :) --Mido 08:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alphabetical order
Shyam Bihari just rearranged some of the languages in this template. While I agree with moving te: away from the end of the 20,000+ list, I don't think ja: and nl: should've switched places. I think the languages were being arranged by their native names (or transliterations), in which case Nihongo (ja:) comes after Nederlands (nl:), rather than their ISO codes. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 08:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Jep, [1]. Looking at the changes ([2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] (my favourite one), [9], [10]) I really wonder why this template is locked when so many people edit it in a trial-and-error mode. (Quite interesting to see how the 100.000+ articles WP became 10.000+ articles in about a week.)
- In case my rant missed the point: Think before you edit, talk to others first. --32X 11:24, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Someone fix this typo
Call me a Grammar Nazi, but it's really bugging me since the page is protected.
"If your are moving a language..." --Wafulz 16:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deutsch @ 500,000
They will hit 500,000 articles any time now. Should there be a new 500,000+ category created? --Dgies 19:03, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see Talk:Main Page#German Wikipedia 500,000th entry. —David Levy 19:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
"Creating a new +500000 section for dewiki alone is a bit excessive; however, it is does seem appropriate to separate out the +100k and the +250k (of which there are currently 4). Feel free to revert." - If I could, I would revert it - in about a week. 1 week is enough to celebrate the recent achievments. :) (Yeah, I've suggested the 250k group earlier, but after some talks I came to the conclusion that only a logarithmic system is fair - until there's a second WP reaching the 1 million mark.) --32X 21:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm .. well, I thought it was a rather fair comprimise, as 4 Wikipedias have already reached the 250k mark and two others are very closely behind. It also seems rather ostentatious of enwiki to gloat about its 1.5 million articles and then severely underrate other wikis' accomplishments--there is quite a difference between 500k+ and 100k+. Would you care to explain upon why only a logarithmic system is fair? AmiDaniel (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Actually I cannot really say what is fair (for unfair see #100,000 reloaded), and somehow you're right. But when I look at meta:List of Wikipedias all I see is a fair list because it's not grouped by randomly chosen values. Concerning the fact that the Dutch WP will have 250k articles soon (that makes 5 in 250k, 6 in 100k) someone may think about changing that value. If the border would be lowered to 200k, then there'd be soon 8 entries (with pt and sv) leaving 3 in 100k. So that all looks like categorizing in different quality classes while the logarithmic scale is way simplier: 8M or 9M is a bigger difference than 10k or 100k, but the achivement is lower (x*1.125 vs. x*10).
- Anyway, I think that template is changed way too often, so even my "rants" aren't arguments for an immediate change. ;) --32X 23:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure there is anything especially natural about a logarithmic series (unless one has a good explanations about why Wikipedias should be distributed exponentially in size), but here is another logarthmic series:
-
- More than 40,000 articles: Česky · Dansk · Bahasa Indonesia · Català · Esperanto · עברית · Magyar · Norsk bokmål · Română · Slovenčina · Suomi . Українська
As is evident here, they aren't really exponentially distributed (at least not at the very large end). So it is really about finding a way to convey useful information while taking up a reasonable amount of real estate, and shouldn't be about trying to force their distribution into some preconceived notion of what is a "fair" distribution. Dragons flight 00:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Now that distribution I like quite a bit better, honestly. The only problems I see are that 16,000 seems like quite an odd number to begin on (perhaps we could cheat and start at 15,000?) and that it takes up an extra line of "real estate," but otherwise I like it. AmiDaniel (talk) 00:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Compliments, and a question
I really like the current selection of language links, both in the bottom section and the sidebar (+ the "complete list" link in sidebar). Aesthetic line-wrap, too. Good work, whoever all is responsible for the current incarnation of this much-discussed segment.. :) (copied from talk:main page)
I was wondering if the "Start a Wikipedia in another language" link was really necessary? It's already linked by the second section at Multilingual coordination, and the lead section at Complete list... Thanks :) --Quiddity 04:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Galician Wikipedia > 20,000
Galician Wikipedia has reached 20,000 articles, please update Wikipedia languages. Thanks --Prevert(talk) 15:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Sandstein 06:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)