User talk:Wiesenthaler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Request for Arbitration

Following the various tos-and-fros on WP:VIP, I have made a request for arbitration. You are one of a handful of users in the "Various" request. Sockatume 21:50, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Request withdrawn; turns out issue was resolved by actions of folk on WP:VIP. Sockatume 22:04, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please stop reverting stable versions of pages without discussion in the talk pages. Jewbacca 04:44, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)

I am reverting your deletions to Yasser Arafat, because you're deleting properly referenced information, not because I agree or disagree with it. Slim 05:27, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
Why did you vandalize my User page, revert legitimate edits to List of ethnic slurs and attempt to delete my questions from your User Talk page? --Wiesenthaler 05:29, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Please, someone block user Wiesenthaler (the artist formerly known as Alberuni) from Wikipedia. It seems to be an obsession for him/her. This troll just added over a dozen "ethnic slurs" for Jews, most of which are just variations of "big nose" (Jews aren't blessed with button noses like you Pakis are, huh?). I don't know why Alberuni's IP address wasn't blocked in the first place. -- CPS 04:25, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

These are the sections User:SlimVirgin twice deleted from her User Talk page [1] and [2]: --Wiesenthaler 05:34, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] What is your justification for reverting to Jewbacca version?

On List of ethnic slurs without engaging in Talk? --Wiesenthaler 05:13, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] What is your justification for vandalizing my User page?

How would you like it if I did that to yours? --Wiesenthaler 05:16, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

What is your justification for attempting to hide these questions without answering for your malfeasance? [3] --Wiesenthaler 05:25, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)


[edit] Reverting to Goldberg's version of Yasser Arafat is not vandalism

Goldberg's version is the accurate and superior version. Because you disagree and are engaging in an edit war to protect the Jewish-preferred version of the Arafat character assassination version does not give you the right to declare everyone who disagrees with you a vandal. In fact, it makes you the vandal and gives everyone else the right to revert your edits to it. What is your excuse for deleting the Jewish ethnic slurs in List of ethnic slurs? Is that also vandalism in your opinion, because you are offended as a jew? --Wiesenthaler 05:22, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You admitted you were a sockpuppet. Who's sockpuppet are you? And why don't you edit under that username instead. Thank you. Jewbacca
I choose not to edit under my usual username because I usually avoid dealing with editors like you and I don;t want you and your Jewish friends vandalizing the pages that I usually editThat's what sockpuppets are for. There's nothing wrong with using sockpuppets as long is it isn't in violation of voting or three revert rules, etc. --Wiesenthaler 05:28, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Alberuni chose to edit under this name because he/she was blocked and because he/she has no social life outside of Wikipedia. -- CPS 04:53, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
It is very interesting page. many comments even on a user. first I am intrested how can you say.
...he/she has no social life outside of Wikipedia ...
May be you know him personally! neighbour or some thing?
Considering that Alberuni never seems to leave his computer desk, I probably know him better than his neighbors do. I wasn't sure if Alberuni was a man or not, but that started making sense when I saw this link [4].
How can you say it? I mean his username password might have been shared? So I'll like you to withdraw from your earlier statement. Zain 03:53, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)
And doesn't it imply he is very dedicated wikipedian! Any how i don't mean it, but that page popped on my watch list. i checked it and saw very intresting comments. Couldn't resist to comment.
Zain 05:05, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Alberuni is certainly a dedicated Wikipedian, but the other editors don't want him here. You are the only person who talks to him, do us a favor and tell him to grow up. -- CPS 09:42, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
And I am the only person he is not intrested to talk!! Please see on his talk page. he never contacted me back. I don't know he responds to all you guys but never to me. i can't understand why. So as he responds to you more then me. So can you ask him to contact me. I'll like you to convay my messege to him.
Zain 03:53, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please read and heed Talk:Yasser_Arafat#Vandalism. Please discuss major changes on the talk page before making them. A content dispute is one thing, but wholesale slashing of articles without discussion is something else entirely. That would be considered vandalism if a random passerby did it, and it will be considered vandalism if you do it. Actually, I think content disputes have the potential to make articles better because there is another point of view that someone is trying to express, or because the article contains content that it actually shouldn't. A content dispute can be a good thing. An edit war will get you blocked. SWAdair | Talk 05:37, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You should bear in mind that the 3RR does not apply in cases of reverting vandalism, and you are clearly vandalizing Yasser Arafat because you're deleting large amounts of properly referenced material without discussion or explanation. Slim 04:45, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
I made legitimate edits to Yasser Arafat. You clearly vandalized my user page then tried to hide the evidence of my questions on your talk page. You are a vandal and a biased editor. --Wiesenthaler 06:59, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war will get me blocked?

My edits are kosher. Why don't you warn Jewbacca and SlimVirgin as they are violating three revert rule? --Wiesenthaler 05:50, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Neither of those users have violated the 3RR. You have, by creating a sockpuppet to continue reverting. Don't try to deny it. The editing pattern gives you away. Anyone looking at the edit history would be justified in coming to that conclusion. Wiesenthaler could be blocked at any time for violation of the 3RR and the burden of proof would be on you, not the blocking admin. Please do discuss major changes before making them. Please do not use this sockpuppet to evade the 3RR again. There is nothing wrong with disagreeing with the content of an article. How you are going about attempting to hijack the article is wrong. If you would like to bring more attention to the article, you may want to consider listing it at Requests for comment. SWAdair | Talk 05:56, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Jewbacca made four reverts in less than five hours. He should be blocked for this violation. [5] [6] [7] [8] --Wiesenthaler 06:37, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

One of those is not a revert, but the removal of a superfluous External Link to balance at the External Links section. Jewbacca 06:51, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
Partial reverts are also applicable under the three revert rule which you have violated. You should be blocked. --Wiesenthaler 06:53, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Nope. Not a revert. I won't block him. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:17, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Sorry, but [9] is not a revert. It's merely a copy edit, with the removal of one link. This has already been pointed out to you. None of your information was removed! It's not like a wholesale revert and the addition of information. I must say, I was initially pretty pissed off that Jewbacca had violated the 3RR, then I doublechecked the edits and found that this link isn't actually a revert. So no, I won't be blocking. Though I would have if that last one had been a full on revert of your info. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:00, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Evidence of Jewbaca's vandalism to my User page

Jewbacca claims that he followed guidelines of tagging a sockpuppet page when the user admits he is a sockpuppet. But he vandalized my page before I admitted to being a sockpuppet. Here is his vandalism at 03:50, 21 Dec 2004[10]. Here is my admission at 04:54, 21 Dec 2004: [11]. Therefore Jewbacca is a vandal, just like SlimVirgin. --Wiesenthaler 07:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppets and the 3RR

Please see this notice that I placed on my talk page. If this account is used again to violate the 3RR, it will be blocked. SWAdair | Talk 08:45, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

You are wrong as I've told you many times. You are calling me a liar, not assuming good faith, threatening and abusive. You should be de-sysoped and banned. --Wiesenthaler 19:18, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] I want to talk with you Zain

AOA

I want to talk with you in details plz be in contact.


Zain 21:01, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Please email me and send ur email address
Zain 03:37, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Arab-Israeli conflict

Wiesenthaler, please do not revert Arab-Israeli conflict again or you will be blocked for violating WP:3RR. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 08:09, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] This is your first warning.

I would advise against harassing Jewbacca. This is your first warning. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:16, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I was not aware that he was doing this. Please provide link and I'll check it out. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:21, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocked

I have unblocked you. - Ta bu shi da yu 21:55, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked as sockpuppet

Since this account has admitted to being a sockpuppet, and this account has likewise been hurling personal attacks left and right, it has been blocked permanently, per Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Disruption. The operator of this account is welcome to resume using his/her other account. —Charles P. (Mirv) 23:11, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/e/User_talk%7EWiesenthaler_fdf9.html"