Portal talk:Wicca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
For discussion about Portals generally, please see the WikiProject on Portals. |
The selected article, for the Correllian Nativist Church, is currently in rather poor shape, with unverified claims, and reading more like an advertisement than an article. By what criteria was this judged an appropriate article to feature? We must have better articles than this, and if not, are we ready to start using this "Wicca Portal" at all?
I also note that the Correllian tradition is widely despised by the wider Wiccan community for their blatant commercialism and their perceived eclecticism. Making this seeming advertisement the "selected article" is bound to annoy more people than just me. Fuzzypeg☻ 03:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] work on the portal
Ive done quite a lot of expanding to the content on the portal, and id just like to say that if you see anything that you think is either not "good enough" for the portal or simply not informal enough, it would be good of you to say something, or help by improving the featured content. :) To my judgment, the only completely empty section is the selected article section, as there is no article i have yet to come across that is good enough to go there, but the article "Wheel of the Year" has come into consideration, and to my judgment, with a few more additions, will be suitable for selected article. Oh, and the colors of the portal must be done too!Brenton.eccles 10:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
