Talk:Why

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Moved from the main page: This page previously, incorrectly redirected to causality but, since the content of causality doesn't have a single use of the word "why" nor does the topic of causality ontologiclly include the discussion of "why" or, by extention, "intent", the link to that topic has been broken. Causality is strictly a discussion of the "how" of events.

This page serves as a stub until someone can generate a good discussion on the ontological implications of asking "why" and the intent thereby implied to exist. No information is better than misinformation. — 65.28.6.146 & 67.52.217.51

[edit] changed redirect

I think that the song is probably a better match than causality for this redirect. Also, this will solve the obnoxious disambig problem we're having on causality. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 00:34, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "Why?" as a philosophical question

Before, the link for "Why?" as a philosophical question linked to Why?, the Artist. I changed it to link to the Five Ws for now, but was unsure if it should be linked there or to the Wiktionary entry of why?

Weien 04:10, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Film

I just have to say that the list of films is one of the most unintentionally hilarious things I've ever read in my LIFE. LoLoLolOlOlOloLoLoLOlOlOlOLol! I'm No Parking and I approved this message 05:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/h/y/Talk%7EWhy_1d3f.html"