Talk:White Sox-Cubs rivalry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the "Socioeconomics", the idea that affluence is attributed to any one team is absurd. There is no proof that the Cubs are a team that attracts the affluent, while the White Sox attracts the non-affluent. It is also ridiculous to say that one race prefers one team, while another prefers the other. Couldn’t that be eliminated?

• It's a stereotype only, and should be labeled as such. The stereotype is that the Cubs attract yuppies and the Sox attract the working class. Wahkeenah 23:25, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Watch for POV Vandalism

"The rivalry is so heated, that it can be considered a "civil war" for the city, with the only thing keeping the city together for many years were the Chicago Bulls and Chicago Bears. However, because of the growing number of Cub fans becoming fans of the Green Bay Packers, which of course, are the Bears biggest rival, many Sox fans, from some peoples' perspectives, are paranoid that Cub fans are Packer fans, so the Bears have now entered the rivalry, with Sox fans saying that since they are Bears fans, Cub fans are, in fact, traitors to the city, and saying that, despite loving a legendary part of the city, which is Wrigley Field, they are "fair-weather" Chicagoans. Of course, a few Cubfans will deny this, especially Jim Belushi, who is a die-hard Bears fan."

"The only problem with this, is the Cubs' history of choking and failure, it could be long time before the Cubs finally win which is great from a Sox fan's perspective."

I'm going to revert to my last edit, and keep an eye out for other POV bull.

What's this bullcrap about Cub fans begin PAcker fans. not true at all. Im a Sox fan, yrt I find a way to unite with cubs fan during football season--Arusnak 17:46, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

-- gavindow 00:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)