Talk:Westernization

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 09:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

Westernisation → Westernization – The Westernization article was created nearly a year earlier, but turned into a redirect with the rationale "duplicated article" (see here and here) a few months after the creation of Westernisation. Please don't accuse me of Americani(s/z)ing or something. It was also predominantly spelled Westernization in the article, and I unified it after seeing this probable attempt at de-Americani(s/z)ation. It likely wasn't moved properly although I've not looked into it (such moves without moving page history are illegal under our licence and they should have been merged rather than C+P'd). Also a majority of pages link to the z article despite how long it's been this way, meaning it's not a case of a move being more trouble than it's worth, hence my suggestion. Darkildor 23:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Voting

• Support. Darkildor 23:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Can't argue with the logic even if it doesn't seem necessary to me. Narco 04:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. American imperialism needs all the help it can get these days. LuiKhuntek 07:18, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
• Support. Though I do not think that it really matters. RoLeoVers 17:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.