User talk:Wendydrag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you wish to contest the contents of an article please do so on the talk page of the article. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 03:54, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] POV

In wikipedia all points of view are give due consideration, we strive to maintaining a NPOV, edits which remove a large amount of information, including those that are sourced, which you have removed several, are considered POV edits, and will be reverted. Their are procedures in place if you wish to contest the POV of an article, see Wikipedia:NPOV dispute.

See also:


Welcome!

Hello, Wendydrag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:08, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I too would like to see lies removed from Pat Robertson - if they are lies. But many of them appear to be well-documented (certainly the quotes are), and if they are lies, it should be explained why and how. The best place to explain and discuss this point would be the discussion page at Talk:Pat Robertson. - Mustafaa 04:08, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

God loves you, yes you. Why not let Him shine through your words and your way. This is a struggle, as I know all too well. God Bless. Wendydrag 04:07, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wha? → JarlaxleArtemis 04:10, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You also might want to look at this policy, Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, as your next reversion of the Pat Robertson article will put you in violation. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:12, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It may get you blocked from editing for about 24 hours. → JarlaxleArtemis 04:14, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia is in need of a fundemsntalist Christian view point but, you must understand that as long as you delete information your edits will be removed. The proper thing to do is to find good things about Pat Roberston or sources that counter what is already there and place them in the article too, not remove information just because you personaly believe it to be untrue. God Bless. - JCarriker 04:17, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
Anyways, they aren't lies; they're just political terms. If you don't believe me, look up the words in a dictionary. → JarlaxleArtemis 04:22, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
Your views will be apreciated at wikipedia and if they can be documanted welcomed into the artcile. However, your tacticts are not going to get your view heard they are going to get you blocked. Please amend your tactics. Elaborate about your views on the talk page, it is considered inappropriate to revert a page more than there times please don't do it again. Our community will listen to your concerns but please respect our customs. -JCarriker 04:33, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

You have been reported in viloation of the 3rr policy. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 04:41, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Do you have proof that they're lies, or are you so caught up in your mindless following of him that you ignore reason? → JarlaxleArtemis 04:46, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

And how dare you compare the Holocaust to criticism of evangelical Christian ideas! 6 million Jews were murdered! And how many evangelical Christians were murdered by critics? None. → JarlaxleArtemis 05:06, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

The page is now unprotected. Please direct your comments to the talk page. Your are already in viloation of the 3rr policy and if you revert the page again I will have no alternative but to block you for 24hrs. -JCarriker 05:07, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
Sorry Wendy, but I have blocked you for 24hrs becasue you have continued to revert the Pat Robertson page, despite being warned repeatdely to respond on the talk page. Please use this downtime to review wikipedia policy. Thanks. -JCarriker 05:12, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Semi-automated template substitution

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/e/n/User_talk%7EWendydrag_5082.html"