Talk:Walts

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apart from it being slang, I thought the term 'Walts' would be an easier way of describing those type of people. 00:58, 13 December 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jetwave Dave (talk • contribs).

And it is in actual useage by members of the British Army at the very least. 04:04, 13 December 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TankHunter (talk • contribs).

ーーー

Regardless of if it should be included or not, the article needs to be totally scrapped and rewritten. It reads like a joke email forward. 11:42, 13 December 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.188.234.130 (talk • contribs).

Creating a term to describe something is a violation of WP:NOR. It also makes verification (as required by WP:V) impossible, by definition.

If the term is in use by the British Army, I'd certainly welcome citations to that effect (see WP:RS, WP:CITE, Wikipedia:External links).

Personally, I think this belongs, at best, in a dictionary: wikt:Main Page, because Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

An example of it's use

http://www.arrse.co.uk/cpgn2/Forums/viewtopic/t=15503.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.168.64.206 (talk) 04:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC).