Talk:Wakefield Cycle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Merge Proposal

I propose that the article on the Wakefield master be merged into the authorship section because no discussion of the cycle isn't complete without one about the Master, while the article about the Wakefield Master might not be able to stand alone very well.--Cassmus 06:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Suits me! I'm sort of new to Wikipedia, so I'm not entirely sure how to go about it, but as the author of the first version of this article, I think your suggestion is sensible so long as "Wakefield Master" refers back to that page. --Otterswimshome 19:36, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm glad you agree. Let's leave the merge tag up for a few weeks, just in case anybody else who's interested wants to comment or leave an opinion.--Cassmus 07:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm proposing another merge here. This time I suggest that we merge this article into the one about the Wakefield Cycle because only that article links to this one, and a discussion about the stanza is not complete without an understanding of the cycle (just like the former article about the Wakefield Master).--Cassmus 22:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)