Talk:Wade Keller
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
Turns out there is a Bryan Alvarez page now.
Who is this Keller34 jerk who keeps spamming the article?
Why is the Nora Greenwald romance joke/rumor considered "irrelevant"? Irrelevant to what?
It doesn't seem to me that it would seem deemable to appear in a encyclopedia article. The article is about Keller as a journalist... not about his personal life.
I didn't realize it was only about Wade Keller the Journalist. There is simply little-to-no information about his personal life.
I could see that for more famous celebrities & stuff... maybe someone else can chime in on whether or not to include it... (same person as 2 posts above)
But wouldn't famous celebrities have more than enough information about themselves? I'll leave off the Greenwald romance joke/rumor (it's openly acknowledged on the Torch website as a joke, but everyone discusses it as if it's serious gossip), but I think any biographical pages should have a happy balance of personal AND professional. By the way, Wade has a cat. We don't know her name.
This is to youse guys who keep vandializing this page...PLEASE STOP, or at least come up with some new material!!!!
--I agree. Do you really not have anything better to do than to vandalize an article? Maybe you could try poking some Jello with a stick or something.
But surely Keller's smartass whiny dirt sheet, and the baseless accusations aginst any wrestlers or bookers he has a personal grudge against deserve a response in kind. Only when the observer stops the mudslinging and clear personal bias should the "vandialising" come to a halt.
--And how exactly is constant meaningless vandalism "a response in kind"? It's stupid and pathetic. If someone has that much time to keep vandalizing a Wikipedia article, why don't they channel that energy into writing some constructive criticism?
(P.S.) Whatever mudslinging the Observer is doing has nothing to do with Keller or the Torch.
[edit] Controversy
I don't see how confusing names in one issue of the Torch is merit of a write-up... but to each his own I guess. I would think questioning his credibility would cite such sources as when he was sure Hogan was coming back and did not and other such instances. I don't think we need to word-for-word those paragraphs you cited, so I paraphrased them. 12.34.246.36 18:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why was the picture removed?
The source of the picture was given when it was first uploaded. It was hosted at www.gumgod.com, and voluntarily provided by the webmaster.--204.246.229.147 16:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Probably because it's not a real picture of Wade Keller. Mr Keller in fact weighs 457 pounds, and has very oily skin. 20 August 2006
- Don't act like a moron.
Isn't the picture public domain?
No, it's not, it's owned by "Honcho" magazine.
It was a screenshot hosted at gumgod.com. Personally, I don't see why this page is vandalized so often. --Amberjet11 17:54, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
