User talk:Wackymacs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

• March 28, 2005—16 June, 2006 (99 KB)

[edit] COTW vs. FAC

I appreciate your comments on the Programming language FAC. However, I'm confused about the comment re. COTW. Is there some formal relationship between those two things? I didn't see anything about the collaboration stuff that said, e.g. "Don't FA nominate an article while it's a collaboration". However, given the millions of words written about WP procedures in various places, it's quite possible I missed something. If it really is a rule, I guess I'll remove the nomination for now... but could you give me a pointer, if so? LotLE×talk 19:05, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:JVC-VHDAHD1979.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JVC-VHDAHD1979.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NeXT

I have gone through and performed a pretty serious copyedit... I also added a large number of {{fact}}s. It's important to remember that this article is about NeXT, not Apple, so I removed a lot of statements about OS X that weren't directly related to NeXT's software contributions. Themillofkeytone 16:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FBI

Can you please look at the other contribs to the article that just happened. I found some non-uesfull edits and I had to "revise" them. Can you just check them out to make sure I didn't step over the line. Thanks. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 03:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Check it out... --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 02:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poetry FAC

I'd appreciate a revisit at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Poetry; changes have been made in response to your suggestions and additional input is solicited on the FAC page. Thanks. Sam 22:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hi

Josh—Big work deadline Monday, so after that I'm freer. Tony 16:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Back to the Future

So what do you have in mind for this article? I'm thinking I can probably dig up some old reviews and throw in a little context about time travelling. I'm not really interested in special effects. Have you checked the history for copyvios? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage, Wackymacs. - Gimboid13 02:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peer reviews

Um, about [1], I prefer manual peer reviews and agree that automated peer reviews are definitely no substitute for ones by thorough peer reviewers. Unfortunately, no person has the near-infinite amount of time to carefully peer review articles at WP:PR; the last time I tried I got through some ~30 articles and yet more articles were being submitted everyday. Semi-automated PRs allow newer editors to get a taste of what featured status requires and help to remind experienced editors of small formatting issues, and yet can be executed extremely quickly. I guess if you find them a bit annoying, you can delete my comment(s) (I won’t mind), but outside of that I can’t give too much other assistance. AZ _t 16:41, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ICRC move/creation

Hello Wackymacs, for the past few months I've been writing a new International Committee of the Red Cross article. I'm finally satisfied enough to propose its move into the main namespace, though it's far from perfect. That article is at User:Draeco/ICRC, and I've proposed a move here. I hope you can take the time to give your opinion, because I see you've commented on the subject before here. - Draeco 18:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Charizard

I noticed your problem pointed out on the Charizard FAC page, I have fixed your problem, so please either support the discussion or make another reaons why it shouldn't be featured status, cheers —Minun ^Spiderman 19:03, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] policy?

Hi. What is your policy on allowing other users to adapt your main page format? or Would you prefer them not to? Thank You. -- AJ24 22:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Originality

Regarding this comment, my user page is now completely completely recolored My talk page still uses your layout, but that may change soon.--Max Talk (add) 05:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hi

Hi Josh

Glad to see you back in the FAC room. The FAR/C room is kind swamped at the moment, too! Tony 01:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BBC World Peer review

Hi Wackymacs. I was hoping that you would perhaps be interested in having a further look at the BBC World article after you left your thoughts on what ways it could be improved. The original Peer review can be found here and I'd be grateful if you could update that page and/or make suggestions on the BBC World talk page. This is all of course if you'd like to. Thanks in advance! Wikiwoohoo 16:53, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] mac

Hi, wonder whether you have inside knowledge on when mac will bring out an all-in-one iMac that is larger than my current 51 cm. Was hoping for 61 cm, but not if it requires a box as well as a monitor. Tony 08:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Apple II images needing deletion

Actually, both me and Carnildo used to be admins. I resigned some time ago, and Carnildo's was taken away and then he failed "re-election". You can use interiot's edit tool and other things to determine the status of users (although due to the database it is sometimes out of date). Sorry for the trouble and I've forwarded your request to User:SlimVirgin who I know is a good admin and sometimes handles things in this area :) RN 23:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apple II

What I've copy-edited thus far is very good. Is it mainly your writing? If so, you're getting better. I notice I typoed "becaus". Tony 15:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thanks for notifying me of the new Macintosh collaboration

Hi there, thanks for notifying me of the new Macintosh collaboration. I have to confess that I had tuned out of the prior collaboration (Steve Jobs) because I didn't really feel competent to add to what had already been said. Again, thanks. --Tachikoma 20:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apple II Featured Article

Thanks for the notification - I just did a little edit (fixed a typo :P) but I'll try to do more than that. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 23:00, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the Apple II article, I have a question: Does VisiCalc always need to be placed in italics? I haven't seen the same in other articles about software, and the italics seems to be placed there solely to imitate the application's logo. =) –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 20:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. I've edited the necessary portions of the article. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 21:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] iPod

Some newcomer has made a dramatic but good-faith edit to iPod. [2] He also talked about it on the talk page. [3] Can you look at that for me? It looks alright to for things like NPOV but content-wise, it's over my head. Thanks.HereToHelp 02:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apple review

Sorry for not reviewing as I'm really busy these days. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wal-Mart toc, consistency in company articles

In response to your last edits to Wal-Mart, please provide an ideal company article to go off of to back up your point in your edit summary, for I am very interested in seeing it. I know you're a member of WP:BIZE, and my WikiProject Retailing falls within the scope of it. One of our goals is to make retail companies consistent, and I am very interested in seeing your opinion on an ideal document structure so we can modify our own idea. Regards, Tuxide 18:44, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh damn...you're fast *grin* Happy editing to you! Tuxide 18:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply, we should base document structure on (although I don't really like the company) Microsoft since it is a featured article. Regards, Tuxide 19:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Does WP:BIZE have a style guide similar to this one? I was looking for one a while ago and all I could find was Wikipedia:Companies, corporations and economic information, but it doesn't explicitly suggest document structure. Tuxide 19:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] West Bengal FAC

Hi! Thanks for your message. Thank you for the massive copyedit of the article. Rest of the shortcomings can be managed easily, except one thing - the map. I could not find out an updated map in the web! However, please see this talk. Thanks. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question of Etiquette

I've written an article on Apple stock at ValueWiki.com. I was hoping to find a few wikipedians to read/edit my AAPL page, but I'm not sure of the etiquette. Is there a forum where it's appropriate to solicit help, especially since this is a non-mediawiki page? Thanks!Jonathan Stokes 00:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ann Saunderson

Wackymacs, I'm not sure why you would revert my wikification on the Ann Saunderson article. Was it a complete wikification? No, it wasn't. Did it improve the article? I feel it did. Instead of simply reverting, why not improve what I had already begun? As it stands now, I'm going to leave this one for someone else, rather than begin a revert war, or even worry too much about it. Cheers. JubalHarshaw 13:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jake Gyllenhaal

Hello,

You seem to be an experienced and helpful editor, so I wonder if you could check out the above mentioned FAC and see if I am being totally unreasonable in having nominated the article 3 days after it failed its previous nomination with 4-2 or 66% support. I did so because the only actionable objection had been the prose, which was then dealt with in the intervening three days by a variety of editors, but mostly DaveOinSF. I've been railing against editors having far too high standards, but as someone who doesn't hang out a lot on WP:FAC, I may simply be unlucky. If you could take a look, and possibly comment or vote, I would be grateful. Dev920 (Tory?) 07:54, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Thankyou for your support. I feel somewhat vindicated now. Even if it fails this FAC as well, I know I was right. Dev920 (Tory?) 14:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:ASDA edinburgh store.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ASDA edinburgh store.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mark83 21:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Mark83 21:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newspapers section of Typography

Thanks for adding seed text there Wackymacs! Much appreciated. If you can expand on it or recruit others who can—yes please. Anything I can do for you?

Arbo talk 21:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Ronwayne.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ronwayne.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 87.122.26.195 20:02, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:IPod Hi-Fi.png

— Indon (reply) — 15:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apple II survey

I'm conducting a survey about the Apple II -- any former users are invited to participate. I found you were active on Apple II related articles.

Come to User:Applephreak/survey

Applephreak 18:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request: West Bengal FAC

Hi! Thanks for your comments in the FAC. I need some help. Please see Tony's comment and also Sundar's comment in the FAC. The article needs copyedit from some editors who are not much familiar with the topic. I guess you are not familiar with West Bengal :) If you have time, Can I request you to kindly have a look at the article and help? --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/NeXT

I have a couple points:

• Early history states their first product was a "toolkit", Whats a toolkit?
• "The first major source of venture capital was Ross Perot"... umm do you mean "first major source of outside investment"?
• What does NeXTWORLD magazine have to do with anything?
• "Hardware" section doesn't flow at all, It jumps from time periods and jumps from pre-release information, specs, aftermath, hype, etc. Just arrange it by; What was happening during it development?, What were its specs when it shipped?, What did people say about it when it shipped?, What things happened after it shipped? and lastly you can add that bit about it impacting the programers careers.

Thanks. - Tutmosis 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adressing my concerns, I have a couple more:

• This sentence seems unecessary in this article, since you talking about the company. I dont see the point to discuss the chip itself on this page. It would be more appropriate on the NeXTcube/Motorola 68030 pages: "The 68030 was supported by the 68882 FPU for faster mathematical performance, the 56001 digital signal processor (DSP) for multi-media work and two custom-designed 6-channel direct memory access (DMA) channel controllers, which allowed much of the input/output (I/O) processing to be offloaded from the CPU to boost the speed of common tasks."
• There is a red link NeXT RISC Workstation in the article. This isnt the NeXTstation workstation, is it?
• I also dont see the point of throwing this sentence at the beginning of 'Hardware', it would be more appropriate at the end of the section: "The 88110, a later chip released in 1990, was used in the NeXT RISC Workstation, however the project was canceled along with all NeXT hardware projects in 1993.".
• The arranging is getting better, but try to remove present tenses from the hardware specs paragraphs like "shipped" because it still doesn't flow from past to present. You say "shipped" in paragraph 4, but only in paragraph 6 do you actually say they were released. My point above was all about this, try to make the article tell a story from past to present, like a history book.
• I'm having a hard time understanding the deal with the "NeXTWORLD" magazine since it wasnt published by NeXT but Integrated Media. Was the magazine about the NeXTcube or was it sponsored by NeXT? Please elaborate.
• That first paragraph in 'Software' seems like it needs to be merged appropriately with 'Hardware'.

Thanks.- Tutmosis 14:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

I fixed myself some of the last concerns I had, and now voted support for the nomination. Good luck with other editors and in any other future projects you plan on undertaking. Thanks for responding and adressing my concerns. - Tutmosis 19:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sculley j.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sculley j.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 01:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:21, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:John Sculley.jpg

Hi, After I responded to you on Image talk:Sculley j.jpg, I looked at the image you uploaded. Unfortunately, while you tagged the image as cc-by-2.5, it was actually cc-by-nc-2.0, which qualifies it for speedy delete (as Wikipedia images need to be redistributable commercially). You may want to contact the Flickr user and ask him if he'll relicense it to allow commercial use.—Chowbok ☠ 19:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New round of Mac FAs?

We have some "pretty good" (i.e.e almost featured) articles on Mac topics. What do you think people wouldn't like against, say, iTunes if I was to nominate it?--HereToHelp 21:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Also: someone has nominated Mac OS X for an FAC.--HereToHelp 22:59, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ups-original-logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ups-original-logo.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:NextLogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:NextLogo.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

that looks fine to me, unless there's a ban on fair use SVGs for whatever reason. You should also wait for Wackymacs to get his say in.--HereToHelp 23:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Delete the .png - there's a replacement at Image:NeXT_logo.svg. — Wackymacs 08:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] FinanceToGo

Hello, Wackymacs, and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, FinanceToGo, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. Calton | Talk 22:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure why I deleted this article, either, since I didn't delete this article, being, you know, not an admin, as it explicitly says at the very top of my user page.

And a product just released -- what, less than a week ago? -- with an article telling about all its fine features? Sounds like an advert to me. --Calton | Talk 07:50, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

In fact, in looking at the deletion log, I see it's been deleted TWICE over the last few days. It doesn't look like your problem is with me. --Calton | Talk 07:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Guy, what part of "I did not delete your page or article" escapes you? What portion of "it's been deleted TWICE" by two different admins was unclear? What aspect of "It doesn't look like your problem is with me" has escaped your attention?

I'm not even the developer. Since I didn't bring up, I fail to see how it's relevant. --Calton | Talk 07:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

You're suggesting something saying that I have added it so soon after its release - however I fail to see anything wrong with that.

Other than having zero time to establish notability worthy of an encyclopedia article, no not really.

You're still not giving me reasons for its deletion.

For the THIRD time, I did not delete your page or article. For the THIRD time, two different admins -- actual admins -- have chosen to delete it twice already. For the THIRD time, your problem is NOT with me. What part of any of this are you having trouble understanding? --Calton | Talk 08:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

No need to shout

If you refuse to read plain English despite multiple attempts, there bloody well is. --Calton | Talk 08:23, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Even more to the point, given that I'm not an admin and therefore can't undelete a damned thing, what were you hoping to accomplish by badgering me? I notice that you haven't bothered contacting either of the two admins who've deleted this thing: why not? No, on second thought, don't bother answering. --Calton | Talk 08:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The day I accept advice from you will be the day you stop being childish. That is to say, not today. Meantime, I notice, again, that in the last nine hours you have completely failed to actually contact the actual admins who actually deleted your so-called not-spam article, who could actually tell you why they deleted it and actually do something about it if so persuaded. Is there a reason to continually badger me as opposed to actually doing something actually productive, or are you waiting for the right phase of the moon? --Calton | Talk 17:16, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Hi Wackymacs. I've been tracking down overly promotional addition of external links to articles by Kanagasingam. I see you created an article about him back on 2006-09-23 that currently reads like a link farm (which is not how you created it). The only links I've found related to Kanagasingam seem to be written by him. I'm trying to find out why he might be suitable for an article in Wikipedia and was wondering if you had more information on him. Thanks. --Siobhan Hansa 20:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. I'll try some clean up tags first... --Siobhan Hansa 20:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rajkumar Kanagasingam

Though the Rajkumar Kanagasingam was posted by me to the wikipedia originally but wrongly as a newbie (and still feel so), it was actually created by Wackymacs[4] and subsequently shaped by others [5], [6], [7], [8] and [9].

After they all have given notability for Rajkumar Kanagasingam only, I started to shape the Rajkumar Kanagasingam.

The Daily News of Sri Lanka [10] is a Sri Lanka's National Newspaper since 1918 and the widest read newspaper in Sri Lanka and overseas.

Rajkumar Kanagasingam has published articles over the years and the following articles [11], [12], [13] and [14] are available online since 2002.

Though the articles have been written by the subject Rajkumar Kanagasingam, the facts he has mentioned in those articles might have well accepted by the populace without any complaint before he published the next article over the years and might have established some credibility within the Editorial circle as well.

I wonder why those articles can't be considered as Reference for Rajkumar Kanagasingam.

The Press Release in Daily News [15] could speak for Rajkumar Kanagasingam's association with leading Sri Lankan and international personalities and adding notability for Rajkumar Kanagasingam.

The US State Department's Office of Weapons Removal and Abatements "Safe Passage" Newsletter carried a news[16] on "Night of A Thousand Dinners" which was organised jointly by Asian-German Sports Exchange Program and PDIP, A Think Tank which was founded by Rajkumar Kanagasingam.

As the PDIP's Secretary-General, his activities in the available publications (on-line) will speak for his achievements.

All of his above attempts are substantial enough for a fair testimony for his notability among Sri Lankans and gives weight of his book German Memories in Asia which is about-to-be-released.

Ezine Articles may be "Vanity Press" but the contents in most of the articles by Rajkumar Kanagasingam are falling in the lines of well-researched and well-documented articles than those of mere Search Engine Optimization (SEO) ones.

After all his Ezine Articles are linking to his Book/Author Info. Page in AGSEP[17], which is an NGO and not to his personal or affiliated sites with ulterior motives of Ad Sense and click-gimmicks. As an author he is trying his fair attempt for his book without any hidden baits.

Some of the linkings might be Link Farms as I am a newbie of mere three months, but you should consider few of the internationally prominent people I have so far created and those have been left out in the wikipedia so far, especially Dr. Gamani Corea and others.

I have spent lot of my time to keep Dominic Jeeva from deletion with rest of my creations Arumaipperumal and Pandara Vannian which are not falling into the Link Farms.

The Internet is introduced after the mid nineties and still most of the news items are not falling into the web-world. By expecting reference for testing a person's notability with on-line reference materials might be some times misleading where the particular persons' references are mostly in off-line media archives.

Internet is mostly weighing a person's prominence based on the Internet availability in English and few other languages and not in all other world or local languages.

I don't have any objections if suitable and appropriate deleting Rajkumar Kanagasingam from wikipedia, but my kind expectation is at least wikipedia should attempt to have a survey among Sri Lankans through its available means whether Rajkumar Kanagasingam is prominent enough or not among Sri Lankans.

User:Rajsingam 2 December 2006

[edit] List of honorary British Knights

Hi. Please note that this is a list for people with honorary knighthoods (i.e. who cannot call themselves "Sir" because they are not citizens of the United Kingdom or the Commonwealth Realms). The people you added are all British citizens, so have substantive knighthoods and can use the titles. In addition, Richard Branson and Alan Sugar are Knights Bachelor, not KBEs. -- Necrothesp 15:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Central processing unit FAR

Central processing unit has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Sandy (Talk) 23:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Abacus Harmonicus

Hello! Regarding the article found at Abacus Harmonicus, our copyvio bot caught that the text introduced in the article was an exact copy from here. I have seen the sentence is found in many other sites, all of which include copyright notices. Although it is just a one line sentence, we would like to know the source from which you have picked it up, if possible adding a reference or external link to it. I won't be deleting it for now, but I will be leaving a note at Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations about this match. Thanks for understanding. -- ReyBrujo 02:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)