Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Materialization (science fiction)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 11:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Materialization (science fiction)

nothing useful here. borderline nonsense. Delete Friday 08:03, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - nonsense. - ulayiti 15:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and disambiguate, as the article has been rewritten. - ulayiti (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete: Patent nonsense.-Poli (talk • contribs) 16:49, 2005 July 23 (UTC)
• Speedy all the time when it materialises. Pavel Vozenilek 22:58, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy, under the second definition of Wikipedia:Patent nonsense. -Splash 23:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Keep the dab page. -Splash 14:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy How can something be a neologism and patent nonsense at the same time? --malathion ^talk 23:32, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
• Hark! There's that distinctive noise of a rewritten article materializing, again. Weak keep and disambiguate with materialization (parapsychology). Uncle G 00:54, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
  • The disambiguation has been done. Uncle G 12:00, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Big time keep! Good save, folks. humblefool® 03:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
• Keep with rewrite. Notable SciFi concept. JamesBurns 03:15, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.