Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gallagher & Robertson

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:19, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gallagher & Robertson

Does not indicate notability. Gazpacho 03:08, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. They seem a fairly run-of-the-mill software company, specialising in terminal emulation (which is quite retro in these days). I found 17 unique google hits for 'Gallagher and Robertson' and 186 for 'Gallager & Robertson'. It's not doing much harm here but I don't think it's vanity or sales promotion. David | Talk 15:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be a very minor software company. --Carnildo 19:38, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, see "Articles about companies should describe companies that are well known, and are notable", below. Tempshill 21:42, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or possibly merge into terminal emulation if appropriate. siafu 23:04, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not notable - Tεxτurε 19:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.