Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Floating-rate bond

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was KEEP NSR 1 July 2005 11:20 (UTC)

[edit] Floating-rate bond

This is a definition, not encyclical 24.154.28.80 20:06, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Errmphl. Merge with bond (which already contains most of this information anyway). Merges make articles fat and happy. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:20, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
• Keep and don't merge. This topic is definitely expandable. It should go further into methodology for varying the coupon, including the various "benchmark rates" (of which LIBOR is only one) and the reset frequency. It should also discuss the valuation of floating rate bonds. Finally, it should mention the use of floating rate bonds in hedging. Just for starters. DS1953 21:19, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I'd be inclined to change my vote if the article were to develop in that direction. -- BD2412 ^talk 21:38, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
• Keep I can see a lot of financial articles linking to this. Its need to be expanded is obvious.--GrandCru 21:50, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand per DS1953. Capitalistroadster 09:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per DS1953. -- Jonel | Speak 04:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Wikipedia needs its financial and accounting sections expanded in many ways. This is one of them. Unfocused 29 June 2005 00:29 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.