Talk:Visordown
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Initial page
Page should be completed within the next few days. Would be happy for it not to be deleted for now cheers!
- If your article is a useful one, then you shouldn't need to 'reserve' the page! But I won't revert to the {empty} template for a couple of days. Good luck with the article! Budgiekiller 13:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
- This article will soon be subjected to the WP:MOS rules and will be completely rewritten. Do not take offence at this, it is simply the implementation of policy. If you wish to discuss this further, feel free to get in touch. Budgiekiller 21:03, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removed prod
I removed the proposal for deletion. It looks like the article can go places now. The main things I see that still need to be done though are wikilinking the article and definitely changing the title of the main header. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 16:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] History of page
As a motorcyclist, I am ashamed by this page! Probably the worst ever page on Wikipedia I have ever had the pleasure (?) of seeing. Who owns this piece of discussion, which although it may be relevant to members of VisorDown, is not exactly "encyclopaedic" and therefore falls foul of a number of Wiki rules. DESPERATELY NEEDS CLEAN UP or as it falls foul of a number of rules, will have little defence against deletion. I'd love to jump and rewrite the whole thing, as I think Visordown is worth an entry - but not being an active member of their forum, I think it's up to them. Rgds, - Trident13 21:11, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ok - I can't stand it any longer!!! I have re-written the "article" on a personal stub page, and you can see it here. Look at the elements below "4. New - From here down" All comments appreciated! Rgds, - Trident13 18:23, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Good, much better, I'd like to see this inserted as the new text! Budgiekiller 21:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Done! Added a few categories which is an essential around her - not sure they are the most appropriate, but they will do the trick of attracting others. Cheers! Rgds, - Trident13 22:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
-