User:Violetriga/Templates4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- "Violet"
- "Strong monochrome"
- "Classico"
- "Obvious"
- "Simple"
- "Developed solution"
"Obvious"
This set of templates was designed to make it obvious what they mean, yet still show the details required. They may be a little larger than some other submissions but that is because there will rarely be more than two or three on one page and they are actually rather important.
The pastel colours have been used to show the four different types of template: FA, PR, VFD and other. They could easily be brought into line, using just one colour. Also note that the images may well be updated to remove their white background in favour of a transparent one.
Contents |
[edit] Featured article after PR and VFD
 |
Featured article
Community consensus has identified this article as one of the best that the Wikipedia community has produced. If you see a way this page can be improved further, we invite you to contribute. |
Other featured articles |
 |
Archived vote for deletion
This article was nominated for deletion, but the overall consensus was that it should be kept. |
Other votes for deletion |
 |
Archived peer review
There is an archived peer review for this article – it may contain ideas that could help you expand it. |
Other peer reviews |
[edit] Featured article with press
|
Featured article
Community consensus has identified this article as one of the best that the Wikipedia community has produced. If you see a way this page can be improved further, we invite you to contribute. |
Other featured articles |
 |
This article has been cited as a source by a media organisation. See the 2005 press source article for details. |
[edit] PR after VFD
|
Archived vote for deletion
This article was nominated for deletion, but the overall consensus was that it should be kept. |
Other votes for deletion |
|
Peer review request
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed in order to get a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
Other peer reviews |
[edit] Was on PR, now on FAC
|
Archived peer review
There is an archived peer review for this article – it may contain ideas that could help you expand it. |
Other peer reviews |
 |
Featured article candidate
This article has been nominated to become a featured article and a vote is taking place to see if it meets the featured article criteria. |
Other FACs |
[edit] Featured article after PR and VFD and part of a WikiProject
|
Featured article
Community consensus has identified this article as one of the best that the Wikipedia community has produced. If you see a way this page can be improved further, we invite you to contribute. |
Other featured articles |
|
Archived vote for deletion
This article was nominated for deletion, but the overall consensus was that it should be kept. |
Other votes for deletion |
|
Archived peer review
There is an archived peer review for this article – it may contain ideas that could help you expand it. |
Other peer reviews |
| Image:Glasswareb.jpg | Chemistry WikiProject
This article is part of the Chemistry WikiProject which gives a central approach to Chemistry and related subjects on Wikipedia. |
Other Wiki Projects |
[edit] FA and FARC
|
Featured article
Community consensus has identified this article as one of the best that the Wikipedia community has produced. If you see a way this page can be improved further, we invite you to contribute. |
Other featured articles |
 |
Featured article removal candidate
This article may no longer meet the standards of style, prose and completeness to be a featured article. Please add a comment to support or contest its removal, or improve the article by being bold |
Other FARCs |
[edit] Was on PR, failed FAC and comment
|
Archived peer review
There is an archived peer review for this article – it may contain ideas that could help you expand it. |
Other peer reviews |
 |
Failed featured article candidate
This article was nominated to become a featured article but it was shown to not meet the featured article criteria. Once the objections have been met you may resubmit the nomination. |
Other FACs |
 |
The above peer review and FAC highlighted that this article is actually quite rubbish |
