Talk:Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-06-29. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on September 29, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,81148,00.html http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/11/is_max_boot_usi.html http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1450548/posts
Contents |
[edit] White House misused Iraq intelligence: ex-official
PAUL R. PILLAR
Paul R. Pillar was appointed National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia in October 2000 upon returning to the Intelligence Community from the Brookings Institution, where he was a Federal Executive Fellow.
He joined the Central Intelligence Agency in 1977 and has served in a variety of analytical and managerial positions, including as chief of analytic units covering portions of the Near East, the Persian Gulf, and South Asia. He previously served in the National Intelligence Center (NIC) as one of the original members of its Analytic Group.
He has been Executive Assistant to CIA's Deputy Director for Intelligence and Executive Assistant to DCI William Webster. He headed the Assessments and Information Group of the DCI Counterterrorist Center and from 1997 to 1999 was deputy chief of the center.
Pillar is a retired officer in the U.S. Army Reserve and served on active duty in 1971-1973, including a tour of duty in Vietnam.
Pillar received an A.B. summa cum laude from Dartmouth College, a B.Phil. from Oxford University, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Princeton University. He is the author of books on peace negotiations and counterterrorist policy. His most recent work, Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy, was published by the Brookings Institution Press in February 2001
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060210/pl_nm/iraq_usa_intelligence_dc
[edit] Robert Grenier
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2036182,00.html
[edit] Copyright violation
Possible copyright violation process does not seem to have been followed, as aricle is not listed at Wikipedia:Copyright_problems as the message says it should be. Also the sections
- February 2003 Memo
- Former members
- See also
- External links
are not from the web page in question, and therefore should not be included in a possible copyright violation discussion. Finally, the web page in question allows the text to be used under GFDL. Simon12 19:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Correspondence/memos
I removed the sections on correspondence and memos. They fall under WP:NOT (collection of external links), and are arguably a WP:NPOV violation. The information is easily available on the link in the external web site section.Simon12 14:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
