Talk:Venkateshwara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article has excessive Tamil usage and Tamil names. It is appropriate to use the Sanskrit terms as they are more universal and reference the Telugu terms because of the geographical location of the temple. Any writer who feels biased about using Telugu words should strictly use Sanskrit only. Tamil or other regional languages which do not have much significance other than the writers' inclinations should be avoided.
Contents |
[edit] Quality of the write-up
This article does not measure up to the quality of Wikipedia articles. The style and grammar should be revised.
[edit] Merger
The content below is copied from Talk:Lord Venkateswara. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 04:19, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
I doubt the accuracy of the number of visitors and most-visited status of this temple. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 21:34, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)
according to the TTD, Balaji receives over 50K per day. On festival days of course the number would be much higher.
- I merged this w Venkateshwara. Please discuss @ Talk:Venkateshwara, and find a compromise so that the dispute can be removed. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 04:19, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dispute
I am removing the accuracy dispute header. Please help make the needed changes if you insit on replacing it. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 20:18, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
I can help cleanup this article --Vyzasatya 23:58, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Content of the article
The title Venkateshwara implies that this article will deal with Venkateshwara (Hindu GOD). But most of the content seems to be about the famous Tirupati temple dedicated to Venkateshwara. Depending on what we want to make this article we might needs to move some content from here to the temple article --Vyzasatya 19:27, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
- All these related articles need heavy reshuffling of content and reorgnization
--Vyzasatya 09:43, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Biblical references
I have removed the references to Baal as a name for Venkateshwara and other related conjecture. There is no basis for any of this and it serves to obfuscate rather than illuminate. If anyone wishes to reinsert please at least make clear that such discussion is merely speculation.