Talk:Umberto D.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
High
This article has been rated as High-Importance on the importance scale.
Maintenance A plot summary needs to be added to this film article, or the current one needs to be expanded.


[edit] Synopsis means summary

This reads like a review in an arts magazine. Possible copyright violation? ~~~~ 00:09, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Synopsis means summary. There is no summary here.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.240.10.170 (talkcontribs).

This article doesn't really read like a film page...nothing about the film, critical response, commercial success/failure, awards, influence or even the plot. There's just a so-called synopsis, which isn't really anything of the sort. It's quite good really, at least if it isn't copyvio, but shouldn't be the entirety of the article --Gargletheape 09:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Umberto D is a masterpiece. What the F*** is this article even about? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.66.13.244 (talk • contribs).

I don't think this is a copyvio - it looks to me like someone's film class essay pasted in here. It appeared all at once from an anonymous IP. I think we should just start over. Save a few useful bits, but basically start over. - AKeen 21:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Having an analysis is a good thing. More film articles could use them. Rather than deleting information why not just add a proper synopsis or plot outline. Doctor Sunshine 18:57, 5 December 2006 (UTC)