User talk:Ukpcdaz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Ukpcdaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Darren P. Grover may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Bill 22:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Removing speedy delete template
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please replace the speedy deletion tag with {{subst:afd}}, and you can make your case for keeping the article by following the instructions in the AFD box. Thank you. --Bill 22:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the page Current events, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- xaosflux Talk/CVU 01:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Voting on AFDs
Concerning Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren P. Grover, please note that each user may make their case, but you only get one keep/delete vote. You have already added three. Please stop.
In addition, it is required on talk and vote pages that you sign your comment, by adding four tildes, i.e. ~~~~. Stifle 09:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prof. Michael Ramsey
The article Prof. Michael Ramsey has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a person or group of persons but it does not indicate how or why that person or group is notable. If you can indicate why Prof. Michael Ramsey is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. howcheng {chat} 19:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Daren's Penis
Please do not make personal attacks on other contributors. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal Attacks?
I made no personal attacks. The fact of the matter is that you concealed your identity as the subject of the article and another contributor stated that she knew Darren but not you, which makes no sense since you are Darren. Actively concealing the truth would be a lie. This is a statement of fact, not an attack. Fightindaman 03:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC) There is only one liar, and that is you, you are adding 1+1 and calculating 3. A typical schoolboy error, my friend.
- You are Darren. You said you were not Darren. End of story. If you have nothing new to say then I'm done here. Fightindaman 03:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
- Statement such as "Good riddance, my-boy, people such as yourselves should not be made welcome on here, nor in society as a whole." (said in respect to me here) are personal attacks. It appears that you've already been informed about the policy so I won't bother repeating it. Also, please don't blank your userpage. Thanks. Fightindaman 03:46, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Darren P. Grover
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Fightindaman 03:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Regarding the page Darren P. Grover, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fightindaman 04:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
I am not vandalising anything, I am adding facts, which you remove as readily as I put them on. It is not vandalism, it is adding more information to the article, which, because you disagree with it, are removing.
"Facts" such as "he has more teeth than Jesus" is nonsense and considered vandalism. Fightindaman 04:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
It is not nonsense, it is true, since Jesus no longer has teeth. And since I authored the article, which you are so hell-bent on having removed, why does it both you, anyway? petulance?
It is nonsense. Such a statement could be made then of every living person. It has no meaning and is just inserted as a joke. Wikipedia is a serious project, not a place to put jokes. If you want to do stuff like that you should check out the Uncyclopedia. Removing warnings from your talk page is also considered vandalism. Fightindaman 04:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Re: your comment that users are allowed to edit their own talk pages (lost in revert). Wikipedia:Vandalism states "Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is also considered vandalism." Fightindaman 04:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Like any other page on wikipedia, upkeep and maintenance is essential, and with the amount of tosh you have covered my talk page with, I have had to remove some of it.
Your talk page is not that long. If you really wish to clean it up you may archive it, but may not delete warnings. Fightindaman 04:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long Talk page to a separate file and then remove the text from the main Talk page. The above does not apply to the user's own Talk page, where users generally are permitted to remove outside comments at their discretion. I am permitted to remove outside comments at my discretion.
Correct, you may remove outside comments, but not warnings. Fightindaman 04:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
That is correct, and everytime I 'cleared' my talk page, i kept the warnings from people who are authorised to give authoritative warnings.
You have deleted the warnings placed here on several occassions. All users can warn other users with equal authority. The only difference between a sysop and a regular user in that regard is the ability to follow-up with a block. Also, I noticed that you have lied about me sending you obscene emails on another page. Please do not attempt to slander me. Fightindaman 04:41, 28 January 2006 (UTC). There is no slander, I have an e-mail, from you, insulting me. I want the article "Darren P. Grover." removed. It is a criminal offence to store information about a person on a computer, I am trying to remove it, but everytime I do, some keeps returning it.
[edit] Blanking VfDs and warnings
Well, you've already been briefed about removing warnings, so I need not repeat myself. However, you've continuously removed deletion messages or/and blanked articles, despite being warned before. This is your final warning; please stop or else. --LBMixPro<Speak|on|it!> 04:49, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
Bad news buddy. The data is still stored in the server. That's why anybody can see it in the history of the page. Fightindaman 04:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
i don't know much about US law, but here in the UK, that's illegal, and punishable by upto 3 years imprisonment.
Maybe you shouldn't have put it there if you didn't want it there. Making legal threats is also generally discouraged here. Fightindaman 04:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
"With immediate effect from the loss of permisson, any data purtaining to an individual, or group of individuals must be removed."
- As you request, the article has now been deleted, since it is a vanity article which is not noteworthy of being in Wikipedia. However
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing this site for posting what could be seen as a threat against another user on Wikipedia. Wikipedia does not tolerate such posting. Users who make threats, whether legal, personal, or work-related, that in any way are seen as an attempt to intimidate another user, are immediately blocked. See Wikipedia:No legal threats for more information.
In view of your comments made to {{{1}}}, namely {{{2}}} you have been blocked from editing this site.