User talk:UCLARodent
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, UCLARodent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] License tagging for Image:Nevadapalacepic.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nevadapalacepic.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nevada Palace
FYI, I have proposed it for deletion b/c of concern that the article violates WP:CORP. Please let me know if you believe it meets the criteria and how. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on December 13, 2006 to James Kim
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. At any rate please do not do more than three reverts in a 24h period. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] James Kim
I understand that this debate is growing rather heated, but the issue of whether the article deserves a timeline or not is really a minor one in the grand scheme of things. Comments like "Crossmr's definition of consensus is whatever he thinks is correct" ([2]) are uncivil and unproductive. Please try to keep a cool head, as we are all trying to do the same thing. Nothing on Wikipedia is worth losing one's cool over. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
