U.S. Oil Politics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is part of the Lobbying in the United States series. |
Political action committee |
527 group |
Campaign finance |
Campaign finance reform |
Major Industry Lobbies |
Agribusiness |
Communications/Electronics |
Construction |
Defense |
Energy & Natural Resources |
Finance, Insurance & Real Estate |
Health |
Lawyers & Lobbyists |
Organized Labor |
Software |
Transportation |
Major Single Issue Lobbies |
Pro-Life/Pro-Choice (Abortion) |
Democratic Party |
Environment |
Federal leadership |
Human Rights |
Foreign & Defense Policy |
Gun Rights/Gun control |
Israel |
About 40% of the Energy consumed by the United States comes from Oil[1]. The United States, with about 5% of the world's population, is responsible for 25% of the world's oil consumption while only having 3% of the world's proven oil reserves [2]. The U.S., as of 2006, imports more than 65% of the oil it consumes.
Contents |
[edit] The U.S. and Iran
See: Operation Ajax
[edit] The U.S. and Iraq
Ex-CIA director James Woolsey and U.S. Senator Richard Lugar wrote: "Energy is vital to a country's security and material well-being. A state unable to provide its people with adequate energy supplies or desiring added leverage over other people often resorts to force. Consider Saddam Hussein's 1990 invasion of Kuwait, driven by his desire to control more of the world's oil reserves, and the international response to this threat. The underlying goal of the U.N. force, which included 500,000 American troops, was to ensure continued and unfettered access to petroleum."
[edit] The U.S. and Saudi Arabia
As of 2005, Saudi Arabia has 25% of the worlds proven oil reserves (the world's largest oil reserves) and has the worlds fourth largest natural gas reserves.[1] Saudi Oil accounts for about 13% of U.S. oil imports. According to page 231 of the 9/11 Commission Report, 15 of the 19 Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks were from Saudi Arabia.
Former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Chas Freeman, said of Saudi Arabia, "One of the major things the Saudis have historically done, in part out of friendship with the United States, is to insist that oil continues to be priced in dollars. Therefore, the US Treasury can print money and buy oil, which is an advantage no other country has. With the emergence of other currencies and with strains in the relationship, I wonder whether there will not again be, as there have been in the past, people in Saudi Arabia who raise the question of why they should be so kind to the United States."[2][3]
[edit] The U.S. and the Soviet Union
Richard Heinberg, a professor from Santa Rosa, California argues that a newly declassified CIA document shows that the U.S. used oil prices as leverage against the economy of the Soviet Union:
"The Memorandum predicts an impending peak in Soviet oil production 'not later than the early 1980s' (the actual peak occurred in 1987 at 12.6 million barrels per day, following a preliminary peak in 1983 of 12.5 Mb/d). 'During the next decade,' the unnamed authors of the document conclude, 'the USSR may well find itself not only unable to supply oil to Eastern Europe and the West on the present scale, but also having to compete for OPEC oil for its own use.' The Memorandum predicts that the oil peak will have important economic impacts: 'When oil production stops growing, and perhaps even before, profound repercussions will be felt on the domestic economy of the USSR and on its international economic relations.'"
"...Soon after assuming office in 1981, the Reagan Administration abandoned the established policy of pursuing détente with the Soviet Union and instead instituted a massive arms buildup; it also fomented proxy wars in areas of Soviet influence, while denying the Soviets desperately needed oil equipment and technology. Then, in the mid-1980s, Washington persuaded Saudi Arabia to flood the world market with cheap oil. Throughout the last decade of its existence, the USSR pumped and sold its oil at the maximum possible rate in order to earn foreign exchange income with which to keep up in the arms race and prosecute its war in Afghanistan. Yet with markets awash with cheap Saudi oil, the Soviets were earning less even as they pumped more. Two years after their oil production peaked, the economy of the USSR crumbled and its government collapsed."[4]
[edit] Dependence on Foreign Oil
American dependence on imports has grown from 10% in 1970 to 65% by the end of 2004. At the current rate of unchecked import growth, Americans will be 70% to 75% reliant on foreign oil by the middle of the next decade. In short, the U.S. is now more dependent on oil, and less secure in its supply, than at any time in the 145-year history of oil consumption. Forbes.com
[edit] The Carter Administration
1973 energy crisis, Carter Doctrine
[edit] Domestic Oil Politics in the U.S.
[edit] U.S. Officials Who Have Worked for the Oil Industry
- James Baker[5]
- Joe Barton
- Michael Boskin
- George H.W. Bush
- George W. Bush
- Robert Card[6]
- James Connaughton[7]
- Richard Cheney
- Philip Cooney
- Donald Evans[8][9]
- Alberto Gonzales[10]
- Wendy Lee Gramm
- Steven Griles[11]
- Robert Jordan (lawyer)
- Zalmay Khalilzad
- Henry Kissinger [12][13]
- Robert Oakley[14]
- James C. Oberwetter (ambassador to Saudi Arabia)
- Joseph Lieberman[15]
- Condoleezza Rice
- Gale Norton[16][17]
- James Schlesinger[18] (first Secretary of Energy)
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/saudi.html
- ^ http://www.mepc.org/forums_chcs/27.asp
- ^ http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,900867,00.html
- ^ http://www.museletter.com/archive/cia-oil.html
- ^ http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00612FF3E5F0C708EDDAB0894DB494D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fB%2fBaker%2c%20James%20A%2e%20III
- ^ http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/bios/card.htm
- ^ http://www.utne.com/web_special/web_specials_2004-06/articles/11232-1.html
- ^ http://contracts.corporate.findlaw.com/agreements/tombrown/evans.emp.1997.01.01.html
- ^ http://www.corpwatch.org//article.php?id=11458
- ^ http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/02/15/BU132842.DTL
- ^ http://www.utne.com/web_special/web_specials_2004-06/articles/11232-1.html
- ^ http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/conason/2002/12/03/bush/print.html
- ^ http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1:47936650/How+Afghanistan+Went+Unlisted+as+Terrorist+Sponsor.html?refid=ency_topnm
- ^ http://dir.salon.com/story/politics/conason/2002/12/03/bush/print.html
- ^ http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-1656017,00.html
- ^ http://www.sierraclub.org/politics/cabinet/norton_background.asp
- ^ http://www.corpwatch.org//article.php?id=11458
- ^ http://www.secinfo.com/dRxzp.3n.htm