User talk:Tuspm/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Nice User Page

I like the format of your user page, so much that I added a favorites section to mine. I even used a couple of the userboxes on your page as well. I just wanted to thank you for the ideas, it look like you put a lot of work into yours. I think the quotes section is a good idea, I might want to do that for mine too. Thanks for the excellent example. Oh, by the way, for your favorite movies you have the Shrek movies listed twice. Thanks again. --Nehrams2020 05:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you! I appreciate it! --Tuspm 10:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Tuspm! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. AmiDaniel (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting me! I really appreciate it! --Tuspm 16:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Typo

I would've edited this myself, but I wasn't 100% sure of your intentions. You note that you will allow vandalism on your talk page. You might want to change that to will not. I stumbled across your talk page after I reverted some vandalism to your user page. Cheers! hoopydinkConas tá tú? 22:56, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
That was a typo. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! --Tuspm 22:57, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

72.60.177.173

Actually, I've blocked 72.60.177.173 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log), since {{subst:blatantvandal}} (bv) is already enough. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:37, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Not a Vandal

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. Happy editing!

Do Not abuse your VandalProof Privileges. It is not Obvious that 70.59.119.37 was vandalising. I could tell why the user removed removed that paragraph even before his last edit with an explanation (and was considering removing it myself). Their are very few editors who are willing to remove content in the name of improvement. Not all IP addresses are Vandalism. Please Discuss these edits with the user and remember the 3RR. You will lose your VandalProof Privileges if you cannot handle it. There is a reason only Admins are automatically giving rollback privileges.

I doubt a Vandal would use the edit summary (rv to Mairi). He/She Obviously Knows what he is doing. Sometimes less is more and we need people who are willing to put their foot in and say this information does not add to this article.

It is unfortunate that This user left it until the last edit to actually explain why He she Did what he did (→Trivia - RV to Mairi, Only picking 2 different areas and not mentioning the rest of the world) so In retrospect it Obviously is not vandalism, However I recognized the Deletion was Good Faith right away. There is no excuse for you to revert twice. That line the user deleted was just recently added and was under Trivia. We don't need Everything in Every Article. I personally wouldn't have deleted it but you have to respect other users Ideas about Wikipedia--E-Bod 00:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Honest mistake. My apologies. --Tuspm 01:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. I should have put my comment above more lightly. Sorry--E-Bod 01:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Please be careful about reverting edits. Especially reverting edits which themselves are reverts of actual vandalism. There's a troll on Stephen K. Hayes who has tried many times to insert the unverified claim that Heyes only trained in Japan for 3 weeks. The edit you reverted was a fix of his latest attempt. --Rustedshuriken 23:57, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Why are you hating?

Surely you agree the idea of Cascadia is a weed-fueled hippy pipe dream! Outside of the geographical/climatic continuity, they have no coherent political motives with which to further their ridiculous idea.

I contribute to Wikipedia and do not allow vandalism on any article. You may use the sandbox for any experiments. --Tuspm 23:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

In addition to the Christopher Reeve Page....

The link Christopher Reeve was an asshole should be allowed on the Christopher Reeve page because it makes the artical more NPOV by offering criticism to Christopher. And if the line "He is the subject of popular jokes, such as "What is the opposite of Christopher Reeve? Christopher Walken!" there should be a link to the Maddox article.

That site is not appropriate and doesn't deserve to be there. --Tuspm 01:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Hitoshi Matsumoto

Um, excuse me. I'm not vandalizing anything and stuff. I've been watching both Gackt and Matsumoto Hitoshi as they are both left-handed and you pulled 'em out. I've been watching these guys for over a year now. So don't remove 'em cuz' it's already been proven. I suggest you watch YouTube with videos of Downtown (in Katakana) and prove me wrong there, pal.

I apologize but there's no need to be rude. --Tuspm 13:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


BENSON IS MISGUIDED

BENSON IS A MISGUIDED WIKIPEDIAN. BENSON VANDALIZED A PAGE BECAUSE HE HAS NO SUPERVISION... ALTHOUGH BENSON DOES HAVE SUPER VISION. HELP! BENSON... I MEAN ANONYMOUS USER 12:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not leave nonsense here. My talk page is a way to communicate with me about improving articles and such. This is not a chat room. --Tuspm [Leave A Message] 13:16, 15 June 2006 (UTC

A Good Faith Enquiry

Hey, I have a question. I could be honestly mistaken, but there seems to be a user named 216.244.12.76 who (appears) to be going through The Twilight Zone episode articles and deleting sections of them (for example, the "Themes" section). I have made these articles a small personal project of mine (to expand and improve them). I also created the new Wiki Category: Category: The Twilight Zone Actors. Can you assist me in investigating this? Please? Thank you. User:ProfessorPaul ProfessorPaul 21:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Sure! I'd be happy to help. I left a message on your talk page. --Tuspm [Leave A Message] 22:26, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I Ask You Because I Suspect Vandalism

Thank you for responding to my "good faith enquiry." I ask you for 2 reasons: 1. You were the first person to enter anything on 216.244.12.76's talk page. 2. I have received no response from 216.244.12.76--he appears to be deleting whole categories in The Twilight Zone episode articles--and (I am sorry, but) I suspect vandalism.

The categories he is deleting are "Themes" of Twilight Zone episodes (like "death personified" or "man's identity" or "aliens invade Earth"); the "Themes" category lists other episodes where the theme is revisited. It is (in my view) a very helpful and legitimate category to have in the brief articles (I did not invent the category; but I was expanding and adding to them--to make them more useful).

Anyway--I do not mean to be accusatory, but 216.244.12.76 may be committing vandalism. As I have stated--I left 216.244.12.76 a message on his/her talk page; I have received no response.

yeah my freind didn't believe it would get changed back in less then a minute... he lost the bet

Duly noted

Thanks for the advice on the SBTB:TNC episode box. That'll probably make it a WHOOOOle lot easier. Eyeball kid 17:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Malformed RfA

I would like to let you know that I have fixed your slightly malformed RfA page, which you also posted at the bottom of the WP:RFA page instead of at the top. Lucky that it was fixed quickly, because many editors around here will not support any malformed RfA. —Mets501 (talk) 00:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for that! Small mistake. --Tuspm [Leave Me A Message] 01:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA

I closed your RfA due to a consensus not to promote and a WP:SNOW situation (everything that useful has been said already). Please read the oppose votes and take not of the reasons so that you know what to improve on so that you can pass your next RfA.Voice-of-All 19:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Article Deletion

Yes ok but I have checked up on the article and it is legitamate. People can then add detail once the article exists. What is the point in deleting it if it is worthy and if it contributres the expanding wikipedia! Sorry I am trying to help!

Sorry. I did not know you had the article checked. I am only human and I make mistakes. Please explain your edits using the edit summary box. --Tuspm Talk | E-Mail Me 19:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

roberto abraham deletion

let me guess its the case error - it needs to be "Roberto Abraham" ?

No, it's not the case error. It's because the article contains biographical information of someone with no importance. --Tuspm Talk | E-Mail Me 19:17, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Never mind about the speedy deletion. You were right and I apologize. But, yes, it still needs to be "Roberto Abraham." --Tuspm Talk | E-Mail Me 19:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
I have moved the paged to Roberto Abraham. Amalas =^_^= 19:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

hi yes don't worry mate -of course there are too many twats on the Internet who do write dodgy and pathetic articles which need to be deleted but I am good. thanks.

Stub Sorting Project

Well, obviously the first place to start is the main project page. They have a to do list that could be of some assistance. I would suggest that you bookmark the list of stub types as it is probably the most useful page in the whole project. In partiuclar, what I do is as follows:

  • Refresh Category:Stubs to find newly-{{stub}}ed articles
  • Open one of the articles and try to determine what it's about
  • Find the right stub type on the list that matches it as much as possible.
    • If there's not one that fits, I can sometimes find 2 stubs that, when put together, are pretty close.
    • For example, there is no {{China-tv-stub}}, so I might put both {{Tv-stub}} and {{China-stub}} on the article.
    • One stub is preferred, two is okay, and three or more is generally frowned upon.
  • Put Stub-sorting. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|You can help!]] in the edit summary.

(A much better description of this process is listed here)

I hope that helps some, and if you have any more questions, let me know or leave a messsage on the Project's talk page. Have a great day and happy editing! Amalas =^_^= 20:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, to officially "join" you can add this: {{User wikipedia/WikiProject Stub sorting participants}} to your user page. Amalas =^_^= 20:30, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I appreciate it! --Tuspm Talk | E-Mail Me 21:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Adolf Hitler

I'll try to use Preview more often, but Adolf Hitler is a long article and thus may be pretty clumsy to edit. — Rickyrab | Talk 16:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I understand. Just try to use it a little bit more so you don't clog the recent changes section. --Tuspm Talk | E-Mail Me 16:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Archive 1
| Archive 2 →
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/u/s/User_talk%7ETuspm_Archive_1_819e.html"