Talk:Tucker (Red vs. Blue)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Machinima, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to machinima on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the main project page and join or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as being of Low importance within machinima on the importance scale. |
| This article has been rated for quality and/or importance, but no comments have yet been left. | |
Contents |
[edit] The image
It could just be me, but shouldn't the image of Tucker go in his character box like the rest of them? Dac 01:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Got it. How about now?. Leader Vladimir
[edit] GFDL notice
On 23:15, July 7, 2006 (UTC), this article was split from List of main characters in Red vs Blue#Tucker. Prior editing history can be found in the editing history of that article. — TKD::Talk 01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Move proposal
Please see Talk:Red vs Blue#Requested move for discussion. — TKD::Talk 17:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Church's role in the Red/Blue conspiracy
I've rewatched Season 3 and Church did not tell them that he was the reason that Vic thinks Red and Blue are the same. He previously told them he didn't do anything, which would include convincng Vic of the discrepancy, and later on when he talks about the subject with Tucker, his exact words are "Vic just made it up to confuse us". As such, that's why I reworded that section. Dac 00:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oops; I just checked, and you're right. My mistake. This is why we all need to work on sourcing. :) — TKD::Talk 00:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed ;) Dac 00:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Layout
OK, one thing I've noticed with this article and also with the Sarge article is the fact that it's pretty much a direct copy of the original article on the list page. All it does is report the character's history, pretty much. I think we should go over it and copyedit it into something like Church or Donut's. Your thoughts? Dac 02:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Revert
OK, my recent edit was reverted under the claim of original research, so I'd just like it to be known that the "sniper rifle" thing was based on a quote in Episode 82, which was recently released. If you still don't believe me, fine. Just pointing it out is all.211.28.230.23 11:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think that was what CapDac was referring to when hje reverted. There was a comparison between the teleporting and sniper rifle that was original research. I actually think that some of the wording was somewhat improved in places before the revert. The whole article could use a good copyedit and combing for original research (subtle comparisons and generalizations can unknowingly slip in, and a lot of this text was written before we started to clean up these articles.) — TKD::Talk 11:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a non-sponsor so I haven't seen Episode 82. As such, I wasn't aware of the quote at the time and thought it was pulled from somewhere else so I assumed it was OR. I apologise for that. However, even if I had been aware of this I would have reverted it anyway because we don't update new episode things until the episodes are made public. My apologies. Dac 11:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. I sorta forget that not everyone gets the episodes early, so sorta my bad too. 211.28.230.23 12:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Feel free to put it back in when we scummish freeloaders get the episode. Wink. Dac 12:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
