User talk:TruthCrusader Archive3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[1]Archive 1

[2]Archive 2

This will be Archive 3 in the future

Contents 1 Re: Can you take a look at this? 2 RFA thanks 3 RfA Thank you 4 DVDVR Semi-Protected, asking for help with the article 5 My RFA 6 Lower Dnieper Mediation 7 Mediation 8 ...8 9 Adminship 10 Lack of resoning 11 ScienceApologist's RFA 12 Chud Manzier 13 King of Kings sig 14 What are you doing...? 15 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/F.O.E. 16 Gibraltar: RfC on Gibnews 17 My RfA 18 AN 19 rspw Afd 20 My RfA thanks 21 I'm back..... 22 Thank you for your support! 23 Rec.sport.pro-wrestling 24 Getting emotional 25 Template:User rc 26 Jobbers 27 RSPW 28 Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Catamorphism 29 Mediation Cabal Case 30 User:Misza13's pile! 31 Reverting Rec.sport.pro-wrestling 32 Talk Page 33 Chadbryant 34 Fair use 35 Wrestling website 36 Thanks from Yanksox! 37 First Family 38 First Family 39 Wickethewok's RFA 40 RFC re History21 Reverts and Comments 41 Heat (professional wrestling) 42 RfC 43 My RfA and your vote 44 For what it's worth 45 History21 is a sock 46 Troll website 47 External link 48 GHe's RfA 49 Mediation request 50 Tired 51 WP:RfA/Consumed Crustacean 52 Percy Pringle 53 World Wide Fund for Nature 54 About Global Reserve Bank 55 Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks 56 Village pump 57 Re: RfA 58 Nishkid64's RfA thanks 59 If you would like to see something very funny :-) 60 TruthCrusader now Calton is worst then ever and uncivil like hell! 61 Chad again 62 Can you have a look at this? 63 Speedy Deletion

Re: Can you take a look at this?

Re: Final Draft - The lack of references is indeed a concern, and statements like "some writers complain..." definitely need to be backed up with references. What I get from the article is that it is about 2/3 of the way toward an encyclopedic style. Phrases like "previously mentioned" and using "they" without linking it back to a discrete subject both don't sit well with me. The last paragraph sounds like it was added by someone who was having trouble with the program and didn't know how to fix it or where to ask for help (or didn't want to try the suggestions that were actually offered). So, yeah, it's a good start, but it needs work. From a technical perspective, I'd add a version history and list of minimum system requirements for the current version. Links to reviews (hopefully citing them as references as well) and more in-depth comparison with similar packages would also be helpful. Slambo (Speak) 13:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

RFA thanks

RfA Thank you

My RFA

Thank you for your vote in my RFA, which succeeded with a final tally of 66-0-4. If there's anything I can help you with now that I'm an admin, please let me know on my talk page. Again, thanks! Mangojuicetalk 21:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Lower Dnieper Mediation

Thans for your work on mediating that case! I hope you now understand how painful all this affair was with such POV-pushing opponents.

Please keep on the work and don't let it go. Thanks again! Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 12:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply (and in French too :)! I have just one favor to ask: if an official mediation takes place, please join as one of the parties. Your opinion as a historian is really important. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 12:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but we have no choice, this affair involved a huge number of people (they will all agree I think). I just hope you will make your statement and explain what you did on MedCab case if this RFM is accepted. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 13:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Battle of the Lower Dnieper/Lviv]], and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

...8

LOL. Thanks. -Ste|vertigo 17:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi and thanks for your message. Having thought about it, I don't want to pursue this at the moment. If it's ok with you I will take you up on the offer at a later date. Kind regards. Mrsteviec 07:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Lack of resoning

It is mystifying. Do these editors view administrator tools differently than I? I thought that RfA was an application for receiving tools to make certain tasks easier. Is an RfC in order? --ScienceApologist 18:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

ScienceApologist's RFA

I gave you an explanation as to why people voted oppose under your support vote. There is no need to ask every single oppose that voted for that reason to ask them again. — Moe Epsilon 20:05 July 07 '06

There is a need. TruthCrusader 20:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

What need? Meaning, you already know the reason: [3] <-- His nomination statement before. — Moe Epsilon 20:13 July 07 '06

I have my reasons for asking. TruthCrusader 20:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't refractor my signature, and next time please come to me to discuss a matter than running to someone else and refering to me by no name. [4] — Moe Epsilon 21:25 July 07 '06

Your signature is blasphemous in my eyes so I will do what i feel is RIGHT for MY talkj page. You don;t like it then don't comment here. TruthCrusader 21:30, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Actually, go ahead and refactor, just refer to me by my username if you don't like my sig, like I did above. And please see WP:CIVIL, I don't like you calling my sig blasphemous. - Moe Epsilon 21:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

It IS blasphemy in MY eyes. I don't have a problem with you Moe, just that sig. Its cool. TruthCrusader 21:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Chud Manzier

Hey, TruthCrusader, could you do me a favour and not tag User:Chud Manzier with the sockpuppet tag anymore? It looks like a "slow edit war", and it would probably be best not to have this drag on. Don't worry, I'm keeping a small eye out for any edits that Chud Manzier will make, as I had my own suspicions of sockpuppetry (never proven conclusively, however) and I've also got Rec.sport.pro-wrestling on my watchlist. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 20:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Don't worry, any changes that occur in Rec.sport.pro-wrestling will be reverted by any number of editors and admins, including you and yours truly. :-) --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

King of Kings sig

Hmmm... well, he just changed his sig per preferences. Some folks may find it offensive, but it's not his username, and I think the best thing to do would be to grin and bear it. Some names would really try my good faith, but while his user name is still Moe Epsilon, I don't find too much wrong with it. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

According to Moe Epsilon, the name is based on the song King of Kings (song). I suggest that you accept that and continue on. Some users have names that others are quite offended by (I'm thinking of someone for whom I have a great deal of respect), but their names are based on something else entirely. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

As long as he doesnt post it here, I'm cool. TruthCrusader 21:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

What are you doing...?

What on earth are you doing at ScienceApologist's RFA? That's very bad behaviour. I see you say above that you "have your reasons" — a statement empty of content. If you think you're helping the candidate by associating him with that kind of bumptiousness, you're wrong. Bishonen | talk 21:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC).

Wow I haven't seen 'bumptiousness' since 12th grade. TruthCrusader 21:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

I would like to chime in also with my extreme aversion to your behavior at ScienceApologist's RfA, which has definitely helped me reach my decision to oppose. That is badgering. -lethe ^{talk +} 20:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Chime away all you want. TruthCrusader 20:53, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/F.O.E.

I noticed you were in some recent edits with User:F.O.E. and decided to notify you on his newly opened RFC. Thank you! — Moe Epsilon 00:36 July 08 '06

Huh? What did he do? TruthCrusader 08:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

See the evidence section. — Moe Epsilon 08:42 July 08 '06

Yeah I see it now. Ok TruthCrusader 08:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Gibraltar: RfC on Gibnews

• Hello, Burgas00 has opened a RfC against Gibnews. Please check it here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FGibnews

--Panchurret 08:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

AN

Re. your request:

Can someone look at User Chadbryant's talk page, under the Paragraph "Notice to Admins". - He has a link to what can best be described as a libelous hate site about a person he apparently has a real life issue with. This looks totally out of line with Wikipedia policy.

I have deleted the link and left a warning. I can't find your original post now,and it's been archived. You may want to make a note of the above under it. Tyrenius 03:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

If you have any more problems, leave a note on my talk page with the diff. Tyrenius 19:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

rspw Afd

"highly suspicious"... No I am not affiliated with anyone involved in your apparent dispute, if that's what you mean by "highly suspicious". However what I am aware of is that the article lacks sufficient content to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Not only was the information there unreliable, but no sources were even cited. The article has also been subject to numerous edit wars even after an apparent consensus was made. The continuous disputes with yourself and whatever other parties involved are for you to handle so it is irrelevant to the AFD. But just because the article is being nominated for deletion does not mean it can't be improved. Like I said in the edit summary, feel free to edit it. Oh and BTW, if you're going to Requests for comment, I would highly suggest that you read the instructions listed at the top first and Sign entries with the date only, by using five tildes: ~~~~~.. --3bulletproof16 18:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

I will look into that. It seems you are emotionally attached to the article. Please try to Assume good faith and read through WP:OWN before you make any more contributions.

Wikipedia guidelines dictate that you assume good faith in dealing with other editors. Please stop being uncivil to your fellow editors, and assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia. Thank you. --3bulletproof16 18:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith --3bulletproof16 18:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

My RfA thanks

Hello TruthCrusader Archive3, and thank you for your OMG support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with an overwhelming final count of (105/2/0). I was very pleased with the outpouring of kind words from the community that has now entrusted me with these tools, from the classroom, the lesson in human psychology and the international resource known as Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia. Please feel free to leave me plenty of requests, monitor my actions (through the admin desk on my userpage) and, if you find yourself in the mood, listen to some of what I do in real life. In any case, keep up the great work and have a fabulous day. Grandmasterka 07:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm back.....

Just wanted to let you know that I finally managed a proper response at Talk:Montenegro national football team. (Well, not so proper, as I overlooked your injunction not to reply to each other until after I had already written a reply. But if this turns too ad hominem then I'll work harder to answer your original request!) Thanks for your efforts to mediate. Cheers, PhilipR 17:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support!

Hello TruthCrusader and thank you for your support at my Request for Adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of (67/0/0)! Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have suggestions or requests - either of an admin nature or otherwise! :) Wknight94 (Talk | contribs) 23:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Rec.sport.pro-wrestling

There are a number of users in dispute over this article and in general. The users in particular include (in alphabetical order) Chadbryant, Dooby Scoo, Linden Arden, TruthCrusader. This does not imply particular blame on any of these. There are aspects of this this dispute that are unacceptable.

If there are suspected sockpuppets, then study SOCK and take the appropriate steps. Do not make accusations directly to or about the individual on your, their or an article talk page. Collect hard evidence. You may wish to report on Suspected sock puppets.

Personal attacks must cease immediately. A personal attack is saying something negative about another person. See NPA if you want further clarification. If you find yourself writing the word "you", be very careful what you follow it up with. Deal with facts and issues, not personal motivations.

Continued arguing of personal opinions on the talk page without verification will be regarded as disruption. Non-negotiable policies are VERIFY, NPOV and WP:NOR. Read them and stick to them.

If you experience a problem or think another editor is violating policy, report it to me with the diff. To record a diff, find the edit in the edit history and copy the URL at the top of the page with a square bracket either end, as in this example:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tyrenius&diff=63910624&oldid=63910146]
which results in this [5].

Violation is likely to result in an immediate block.

Tyrenius 23:32, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Getting emotional

Understandable when one cares for a subject. The problem is that it then ends up with no one being able to edit anything and all the time being taken up in confrontation. Let's work by the policies - they work. It's only when they're ignored that things go pear-shaped. Admins are there to make sure they are maintained. Tyrenius 07:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:User rc

Why did you change my user box from "User is a Roman Catholic" to "User is interested in Roman Catholicism"? There is a BIG difference. If you are going to change userboxes for technical reasons, fine and dandy, but try to at least get them right! TruthCrusader 19:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Hi TruthCrusader, I did not change the content of Template:User rc, Cyde did. [6] What I did was userfy it [7] and display a list of alternatives. [8] I see you already picked one. Regards Rfrisbie^talk 20:16, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Jobbers

are you familiar with the wiki page on wrestling jobbers? there is a revert war going on there about what constitutes a jobber. i'd like your opinion. there's a wikiproject page that also discussing wrestling on wikipedia and right now this particular topic if you are interesting in joining that discourse. WillC 22:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

RSPW

Again, please show me where the New Zealand reference was reached by concensus and you will have your wish. Your policy for this article indicates that if this woman had told of how one day she was sick and decided to write a thesis on what the most popular non-wrestling topic on RSPW is, it would be warranted to say in the article, "in her book, she says that on a day that she was sick she decided to write a 25-page thesis on what the most popular non-wrestling topic on RSPW is and her conclusion was blah blah blah." That is asinine.JB196 21:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Catamorphism

Just wanted to drop off a very quick note — I've asked the nominee a question to clarify their position on assuming good faith and on anonymous editors. Thought I would let you know in case the response would be of interest to you with regards to your vote on their RfA. Thanks. — Mike (talk • contribs) 15:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal Case

Hi, I am a fellow MEDCAB member, and I was wondering if you could take over a case for me? It's Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-07-17_Transylvania_article, and is very historical. Unfortunately, it's getting a bit too long for me to keep track of, and since you say you are interested in history cases, could you help me out? I don't think I'm doing a very good job, and so I thought you'd probably finish the task with both users involved satisfied.

Thanks, --BarryC _(talk) ^Uncyc 15:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks anyway. --BarryC _(talk) ^Uncyc 15:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Misza13's pile!

Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of supports gathered on my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 0x0104/0x01/0x00. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on my talk page. Misza13, the rouge-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing! NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated ROT-26 algorithm. Ability to decipher it indicates a properly functioning optical sensor array.

Reverting Rec.sport.pro-wrestling

You are reverting said article to a version that contains an invalid source (by Wikipedia standards, Usenet posts are not a suitable source for a Wikipedia article) and an improper categorization (RSPW is not a website). Please cease in this potentially disruptive behaviour. - Chadbryant 13:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

As a neutral third party, I cannot see how your accusations are true. Please engage in a dialogue that respects the Wikipedia policies and establishes a precedent or explanation for your wordings in regards to the subject matter you have made on this talk page, thanks. --Dooby Scoo 05:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Talk Page

Hi TruthCrusader, I actually semiprotected your page for a little bit, but after looking at the history of your talk page, I don't see how a semiprotect will help. Semiprotecting your page only blocks out edits from new and anonymous users, which won't solve anything on your page because I don't see any such problems with it. Sorry, I just don't feel comfortable doing this when that's not the problem you're encountering. Cheers, Deathphoenix ʕ 21:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Don't thank me yet, TC, I undid my actions after I saw it wouldn't do anything. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:28, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem. As for Boa vs Python, well, I'm just a janitor, what I say doesn't really matter. :-) I simply suggest that you look at similar articles (such as other movies) and adjust the layout and content appropriately. --Deathphoenix ʕ 21:36, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Chadbryant

I have left a final warning on his page. Let me know if there are any problems. I have reinstated his comment on your page. It is a legitimate request. It is not a good idea to cite a bad example as a precedent. Such deletions can amount to vandalism. Tyrenius 22:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I realise, but restraint is necessary, or you'll end up in the same boat... Tyrenius 22:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use

There's no fixed number, but it should be the minimum amount necessary for the article. Each one should be able to be justified as needed, and its absence detrimental to the understanding of the subject. A judicious, sensible appraisal is needed. I suggest also checking out other articles, particularly featured articles. By the way, this image comes out mainly black on my screen, and needs to be lightened. Tyrenius 22:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Bit small and bit blurred, but at least you can see the figure etc now! Tyrenius 13:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Wrestling website

TruthCrusader, I don't know if you know about wrestling websites besides DVDVR, but if you do, would you take a look at Ultimate Wrestling Domain for me. Thanks and cheers!--Kchase T 07:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks from Yanksox!

Hey, TC, thanks for supporting my RfA, which registered a tally of 104/4/7. Which means... I am now an admin!!! I was and still am very flattered by all the kind comments that I recieved, I will also take into account the comments about how I could improve. I guarantee I will try my best to further assist Wikipedia with the mop. Feel free to drop in and say hi or if you need anything. Again, thank you so much! Yanksox 04:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

First Family First Family Please help me. I am asking you, as a favor, to review the First Family of the United States article as it was immediately following my last contribution, before entire families were reverted. I seem to be the target of some kind of vendetta, and recently it seems that all of my contributions have been swiftly deleted. There wasn't even a reason given; they just axed the Ford, Eisenhower, and Nixon families without explanation. There was no political bias in my wording, no controversial claims, nothing even remotely resembling a hoax. They even took down my pictures, all of which were public domain. Please read this article and then write your honest opinion in its talk page. I have been writing with Wikipedia for over ayear now but am seriously considering leaving because of this. History21 07:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)History21

Wickethewok's RFA

Thanks for your support on my RFA. The final vote count was (61/9/3), so I am now an administrator. Feel free to let me know how I'm doing at any point in time or if you need anything. Once again, thank you. Wickethewok 15:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

RFC re History21 Reverts and Comments

Rangeley, History21, TruthCrusader:

FYI, I've named you all as parties who attempted to resolve the issues raised at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hipocrite.

Thanks, TheronJ 22:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Heat (professional wrestling)

I've left a message on User:Chadbryant's talk page. It would be helpful if you could provide any suggestions on the article talk page that would point other editors in the right direction to bring the article up to standard. Or, if you think it doesn't have a place, and is not suitable, then propose it for AfD. Tyrenius 18:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's up to you and/or the other editors to work it out, I think. Sometimes people do use Usenet. See Lumber Cartel, the talk page and the relevant AfD. Tyrenius 18:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

It it's about what fans think and how they react, it might be appropriate to use fan sites. Tyrenius 18:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

If you follow Wiki policy and act civilly to other editors, if appropriate discussing on talk page, then you will be OK. However, you are entitled to delete unsourced material at your discretion, and it is important to maintain article standards. It is up to an editor wishing to retain material to validate it. Verification, NPOV and NOR are non-negotiable policies. Tyrenius 19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

RfC

I haven't studied RfC in great detail, but, from what I've heard, the best thing is to let it run. It can go in unexpected directions. People are not going to accept anything that is abusive. Participate. Tyrenius 21:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

My RfA and your vote

Hi TruthCrusader, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. I'll work towards getting more involved in the wiki mainspace. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page. Sincerely, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me)

For what it's worth

A couple of the newer commentators on the Hipocrite Rfc have taken the direction of the Rfc in directions it doesn't need to go. Hipocrite is excitable, but more often than not, he is correct. I can't speak for Torinir being somebodies sockpuppet since I don't see that, and in fact I don't know if anyone who has posted there is a sockpuppet...but I do honestly believe that the reason the Rfc is becoming more dramatic is because two editors have entered the arena after wikistalking Hipocrite...sorry drama from other situations have taken a front stage over the primary questions as I know that you, TheronJ and Rangeley are acting in the best faith based on what you think.--MONGO 21:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Could you explain your comment in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Eyre/Heller Dynasty in the United States which you said was a historical fact that Jehu Eyre financed the US in the Revolutionary War? Did you assume that this was a fact from the Eyre articles, or did you come up with this idea from another source? User:Zoe|(talk) 23:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

There was/is another source. TruthCrusader 05:06, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Can you supply it? I'm honestly trying to track down information, this is not intended as a dig or anything other than a search for knowledge. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's an interesting link to Jehu Eyre's revolutionary war activities, assuming it's the same guy.[9] (Nothing about financing, though). TheronJ 18:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's another.[10] (Still nothing about financing, although I vague recall that most people who "raised a company" paid its initial expenses). TheronJ 18:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Except that the various articles claimed that the Eyres gave so much money that at today's values it would be over $6 billion. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

"His death in 1781". The article claimed he was buried in a cemetery which didn't start taking bodies till the 1830s. Unless he was exhumed ... User:Zoe|(talk) 23:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been convinced you and hipo were right -- it must have been a hoax, but what a wierd, wierd hoax. TheronJ 01:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

History21 is a sock

See this, this, and this. rootology (T) 00:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Troll website

This edit summary [11] is inflammatory in a sensitive situation. It needs a little less harshness and a bit more sensitivity. That's only a workshop page - it's not even the main article. It would be much better if you had left it there, and instead put a reasoned argument on the talk page as to exactly why you think it is not an appropriate external link. That way, if you achieve consensus for your viewpoint, you are much more likely to achieve a lasting result. It also shows respect for fellow editors, by giving them the chance to put their views. This is core to a collaborative project. Tyrenius 01:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

External link

Please see [12]. Tyrenius 01:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

GHe's RfA

Mediation request

I am relatively new to Wikipedia and learning. Mediation is welcome if you are able to visit the Brett Kavanaugh discussion page. Perhaps you can be helpful. Thomist 13:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Tired

Indeed, personal aspersions of this kind should not be made, but you didn't tell me where they had occurred. Tyrenius 16:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Johntex is supervising that, as you know, so you should consult him about it. Tyrenius 21:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:RfA/Consumed Crustacean

Success. Thanks for the supporting vote. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Percy Pringle

Chadbryant has removed the information again, the 4th revert he's done in less than 24 hours. Can you help please? Sasaki 22:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

World Wide Fund for Nature

Chadbryant again violating the three revert rule Sasaki 22:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

About Global Reserve Bank

Hi TC, How is things gooing?

I have given up the reposting or starting an article about GRB www.grb.net [13] maybe they are right, there is no place for info about a organization and movement as GRB? My frustration is also about the fact that the Deletionist activities are so effective, they are coordinated and well organized, in fact they could grow and delete just about anything if this continues :-( ok I am frustrated, and still not used and connected in Wiki so I am a easy victom.. But I am learning, slowely though becouse my work, studies and privat life is takeing most of my time :-)

At least there is a article about Ecological Economy up and running and I belive that a GRB-link should be on that page, Calton disagree (strange right?) check it out at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ecological_economics#Calton_read_this.21

If you need any help, let me know :-) --Swedenborg 06:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Mr. Lefty's RfA thanks

Hi, TruthCrusader, and thanks for supporting me in my recent request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 70/4/4. I hope I can live up to your expectations, and if there's ever anything you need, you know where to find me! --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 00:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Village pump

I think this is already covered by common sense, and doesn't need to be spelled out specifically. Tyrenius 15:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

So how many examples of it are there? Also, maybe the person it's happened to, doesn't mind. If it happened to me, I would leave a warning, and I think most people would consider it inappropriate. Tyrenius 17:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: RfA

It appears that I was saving the page - but you voted and it saved the old version instead. I really didn't intentionally do that - I have no reason! Once again, you have my most sincere apologees. --HolyRomanEmperor 18:33, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Nishkid64's RfA thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA, which closed successfully earlier today with a result of (60/9/4). Although, I encountered a few problems in my RfA, I have peacefully resolved my conflicts and made amends with the people involved. If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free talk to me. I hope I will live up to your expectations. --Nishkid64 22:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

If you would like to see something very funny :-)

Concerning your attacks on Calton Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

(I'm referring to this edit, which includes a personal attack in the edit summary.)

RandomP 02:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Ha, ha ha... I guess that one choose what to see, you think that Calton is cool and never has been uncivil and have freqvent attacks all over the place on a very personal level? I am the bad one here right? :-) Well thank you for your advice, I will be more cool.--Swedenborg 06:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Swedenborg" --Swedenborg 06:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

TruthCrusader, now Calton is more difficult then usual, check history on Ecological Economics if I understand it correctly I have followed Wiki standards and if he will delete again he will break the Wiki roul of changing 3 times in 24 hours? Much appriciate if you could help me here. --Swedenborg 19:06, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

TruthCrusader now Calton is worst then ever and uncivil like hell!

If he change again he will break the 3 change within 24 hours, how can I report this and get some action? He is increadble rude and unpolite and it is obvious that he has no what so ever knowledge of the subject he is just furious and in deletion and shouting mode... please help. [[14]]History --Swedenborg 14:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi again, what du you make of this comment?

Please be careful of frivolous vandalism accusations and the 3RR rule This is in reference to your edit summaries at [1], [2], [3], etc. Please don't accuse editors of vandalism unless you're absolutely sure they have committed it. In particular, avoid using the word in edit summaries (such as "reverting vandalism"). Review the vandalism policy thoroughly before you do that, and see especially the section "What vandalism is not". Note that content disputes are not vandalism, and that good-faith edits of any kind, even if you think them misguided, are not to be considered vandalism. Vandalism accusations without any basis in policy are bad for the climate on the wiki and make constructive discussion more difficult. See WP:VAND: "If a user treats situations which are not clear vandalism as vandalism, then he or she is actually damaging the encyclopedia by driving away potential editors." Another point: it is obvious from Talk:Ecological economics that 213.67.58.xx is you, so be careful of violating the WP:3RR rule. I understand that it's possible to get logged out accidentally, but please do try to always edit logged in in a potential WP:3RR situation, as IP editing could look deceptive under those circumstances. Bishonen | talk 20:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC).

Bishonen, I can asure you that I always log in when editing, however it sometime have happend that I have not and working with comuters and sequrity for 20 years, I am very well aware that it is possible to indentify by ip-adress, I did not try to be deceptive that is a total wrong and disparaging accusation. Question: Is accusation of spamlink not a threat to wikipedia, is a person who clame that he is fighting fundamentalists him self becoming a fundmanentalistic and notorious deletionist with a foul and agressive language not a threat to wikipedia, I have noted several users that left wikipedia after beeing attackt by him, and I am one of them who strongly are thinking of leaving if carracters like him are the model for what wikipedia stands for? I have not breaked the 3RR rule but if he deletes the external links (that I and several others belive is highly valid links in this article) he is breaking it. I do not know who you are or your relation to Calton but from your statement it is obvious that you have made a personal judgement of who is right and who is using non civil and nontrespect language here.--Swedenborg 22:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Retrieved from [[15]]

Chad again

Hi TruthCrusader,

This particular behaviour probably requires the attention of other admins. I don't think I can reliably make a judgement on this myself. Maybe you should post a request on WP:AN or WP:ANI. Cheers, Deathphoenix ʕ 21:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Can you have a look at this?

[16] I feel not good about the attacs on me, can this be... --Swedenborg 06:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hey TC,

Looks like someone else deleted the page, so only admins can see the edit history now. If you want to have what someone says is your real name deleted from the edit summary, it's not possible for me to do, because I don't have the access. That requires Oversight access, and they can't delete just the edit summary: they can only delete the entire edit. If you still want it deleted, I suggest you contact one of the users with oversight access. HTH, Deathphoenix ʕ 13:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)