User talk:TruthCrusader Archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User talk:TruthCrusader Archive1
This is Archive 2
[edit] User conduct comment request
It'll keep on getting removed until you create a Request for Comment page for it and abide by all the guidelines it sets forth. For an example, look at the Dzonatas request right under your's. tv316 21:32, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Im doing it correctly right now, kinda realized what happened. TruthCrusader 21:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
for 24 hours for incivility after final warning. I posted "One more childish trolling comment and I block for a week." and your next post is "Why dont you f**king prove then it isn't my pic." TruthCrusader, think about this. Be done with trolling, be done with incivility, be done with feeding trolls, be done with any dispute which does not involve the article content. Enough is enough. Next time it will be a week, everyone is tired of this. KillerChihuahua?!? 17:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] My RFA
Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask. |
Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RFC on Chadbryant
Just a note to let you know that this RFC was not certified by two users within 48 hours of being created. As such, it has been deleted. Stifle 02:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Successful RfA
Thanks for your support and kind words on my recent RfA, which I am pleased to say passed with a final tally of 80/1/1. If you ever need any help, or if I mess something up as an admin, please let me know. Cactus.man ✍ 08:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] RfA thanks!
Hi TruthCrusader! Thank you for supporting my RfA. It passed at 105/1/0, putting me in WP:100 - I'm delighted and surprised! I'm always happy to help out, so if you need anything, please drop me a line. I hope to stay steady and reliable! Cheers! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:Ourcottage21.jpg
I wasn't sure if you took it or what license it was under, thanks for tagging it. You might want to consider adding it to commons if you want other people to be able to use your images for non Wikipedia purposes. As for the delay in tagging, it was tagged a while ago but we have a massive backlog on the untagged images project :) -- Tawker 14:55, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I'm not orphan bot by the way, it was an actual human edit above :) -- I guess I should have tagged it gfdl presumed and asked you to gfdl tag it yourself. Half the problem with the image tagging is there literally are 10,000 images without any "templates" applied to them, sorry if I concerned you a little with the notice out of the blue. On the other hand thanks for the support :) -- Tawker 23:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Christianity Knowledge Base
Hi TC,
I'd like to thank you for hopping on board. We would love your input. Please visit the page here and get started at your earliest convenience!
-- nsandwich 23:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RfA Results and Thanks
TruthCrusader Archive2, thank you for your constructive opposition in my recent RfA. Although it did not succeed as no consensus was declared (final: 65/29/7), I know that there is always an opportunity to request adminship again. In the meantime, I will do my best to address your concerns in the hope that when the opportunity for adminship arises once again, you will reconsider your position. If at any time I make any mistakes or if you would like to comment on my contributions to Wikipedia, you are more than welcome to do so. Regardless of your religious, cultural, and personal beliefs, I pray that whatever and whoever motivates you in life continues to guide you on the most righteous path.
--- joturner 05:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Thank you
Hello TruthCrusader, how are you? Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (88/3/1), so I am now an administrator. I am very humbled by your vote and grateful. Please let me know if at any stage you require assistance, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an administrator. Once again thank you and with kind regards Gryffindor 17:31, 2 April 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] RFA Thanks
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. --CBDunkerson 15:08, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi TruthCrusader. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] thanks for the support
Hi TruthCrusader- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! --He:ah? 22:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thank you
Thank you! Hello TruthCrusader Archive2. Thank you for your support in my RfA! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to talk, let me know. Cheers! -- Fang Aili 說嗎? |
[edit] Just another RFA thank you note
Dear TC, I appreciate your vote and your kind words in my RFA. It has passed with an unexpected 114/2/2 and I feel honored by this show of confidence in me. Cheers! ←Humus sapiens ну? 04:24, 26 April 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Marijuana Wiki
Hi TC,
I see that you are a pro-Cannabis Wikipedian so I hope this will be of some interest to you.
I've started a Marijuana wiki (aka The Sticky Wiki) which I think you might be interested in. I'm hoping you can help me get started with this project. Whereas lots of articles about weed get speedy-deleted on Wikipedia, they would be totally cool over at MarijuanaWiki. But really I want the site to be more of a marijuana community than merely an encyclopedia.
To give you an example, I want to have city guides about where to score, find pot-friendly cafes, marijuana events, and what represents a good price in that city. Etc. (You can check out the featured article: "Toronto" to see what I mean). Of course, I want to see articles about the negative health effects and the drug laws in each of the countries. I also want to have grow diaries and marijuana blogs. All in all, basically more communal than encyclopedic.
I am in need of admins/moderators, and people experienced with MediaWiki to help build policy, categories, and templates, etc. If you'd be interested in helping me with this project, the URL is MarijuanaWiki
Thanks for your time and consideration. Hope to see you there!
-- 70.50.79.10 00:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Editor / User Page Review
Hey TruthCrusader –
You opposed my last RfA in March on rationale I believe may have been related to my user page. In the time since then, I have changed my page to be more universalist (which still conforms with my personal beliefs) and removed the majority of information regarding my conversion to Islam in favor of a section on my philosophy (as well as yours if you desire). Now, I'm looking for your feedback on what you think of the redesign of the page and whether it is sufficient in quelling the March controversy over the page as well as solving the issue about possible inability to maintain a neutral point of view, especially in religion-related articles. For what it's worth, the reason I kept a condensed version of the timeline was because there were, and still are, many people who find it interesting instead of a form of proselytization. Many people have also given me positive feedback on my talk page regarding the look of the page. I personally believe that it is okay to insert individuality onto user pages, especially if it still promotes a sense of community. That is what I was going for with this current version of my user page.
Please make comments regarding the user page on my editor review page. Thanks in advance. joturner 15:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DVDVR under AfD again
Hey, Death Valley Driver Video Review is under AfD again (someone who got banned from the board tried to call the admins nazis and stuff in the article, and then when he couldn't get his way in the article, listed it for deletion again. Any comments on the AfD would be appreciated. Have a good one! SirFozzie 21:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
No problem, I'll always go to bat for you guys, don;t worry. TruthCrusader 06:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- SirFozzie, I am simply concerned about the article's lack of neutrality and the site's lack of notability. Also, please stop writing false information about me as if it was fact. I have never called anyone a nazi and I don't appreciate your uncivil remarks on my page and on other talk pages. You may have missed WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF so please take a good look at those pages.JB196 18:49, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] FYI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Israeli_apartheid_%28phrase%29
[edit] Calton
I suggest first thing would be to place a message on User talk:Calton to register your displeasure with his remark and see if he would be prepared to either apologise or withdraw the remark. If he does not the it might be worth listing him at WP:PAIN. Personally, I have never heard that phrase used before, so do not understand the connotations it has. Regards, Tim! 17:41, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- I think you gave me the wrong link, i take you mean what he said on the stupid and contagious afd? Tim! 17:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Right OK, thanks for the info. I asked Calton to refrain from using that word. Tim! 18:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- You made an extreme racial slur on this edit comment
- You could say that -- but only if you're either dishonest or not very bright. The jury's still out on that issue.
[edit] Tampering with Wikipedia Processes
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. }} --Calton | Talk 01:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Global Reserve Bank
I have, with a bit of digging, uncovered a lot of information that supports the un-deletion of the Global Reserve Bank entry. It is, apparently, a real plan that has a lot of mentions in various mainstream and reputable publications. Here are some links: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
The only problem is, none of the links you dug up prove a thing, even assuming they qualified as reliable sources to begin with (which the first clearly doesn't). I mean, did you actually bother to read them, or did you, as I suspect, pull out sites that happen to have the text string "Global Reserve Bank" in them? The first link is a self-reference, since it's the homepage of the subject of the article, so is automatically not a reliable source. The others are sites that use "Global Reserve Bank" in an entirely different sense than the deleted article, as various economists's hypothetical global versions of the US Federal Reserve Bank. Provide some actual reliable sources of the actual concept being discussed, and maybe you have a shot at convincing anyone. Until then, it doesn't deserve yet another bite of the apple. --Calton | Talk 08:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Hi TruthCrusader, ok lets do it. I need to get more skills in my Wiki work so undelete of Global Resource Bank will be a good project... I have the sciensrepport from -74 I will scan that and put as one source... then what else is needed according you? --Swedenborg 19:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DVDR afD
Just a heads up that I've relisted DVDR for deletion.JB196 22:10, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Hi TK, I saw your message. Yeah, looks like an immediate renomination. I am closing it, but please use WP:ANI in the future. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 10:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Why the attitude?
TruthCrusader, it has become apparent that you and I don't see eye-to-eye for reasons not clear to me. You have sniped at me on many different talk and afD pages and I fail to see what your disapproval of myself stems from. Hopefully we can clear this problem up before it escalates as I had nothing against you until you started violating WP:CIVIL and other Wikipedia standards in responses directed at me. Thanks, please get back to me when you can.JB196 20:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I know you have an issue with how I feel about the DVDR entry, but my question is why are you taking that situation and extending it to other talk pages, and why at the very least can you not be civil in doing so?JB196 08:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Mallory Lewis
You know, I'd suggest that you grow up, but I suspect it's too late for that.
In the future I humbly suggest you do some RESEARCH on the articles you want deleted
Okay, that's funny! You mean like the quality research job you did on Global Reserve Bank above? That kind?
And where are those high-quality references, anyways? The article still relies on the subject's own website -- which is a no-no, something you'd know if you had the slightest acquaintance (or perhaps I should say, based on your track record, the slightest interest) in WP:Reliable sources. --Calton | Talk 07:06, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Just when I think Wikipedia can't sink any lower, I am proven wrong. TruthCrusader 14:41, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Considering how much ballast you've singlehandedly put on board, I can't imagine why you'd be surprised.--Calton | Talk 23:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Global Reserve Bank
Hi, how can I contact you on email? mine is lennart_bylund@yahoo.se
--Swedenborg 12:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Leader of the Eyre/Heller Dynasty in the United States
Hi, TruthCrusader, this is History21, author of the various Eyre and Heller articles. I was very pleased to see that you had removed the Deletion Box from the Leader of the Eyre/Heller Dynasty in the United States page, but am dismayed to tell you that since then a group of editors, including User:Calton, are driving a push to delete not only that piece but almost every piece related to it. I have provided abundant sourcing on the Talk Pages, and hope that you will please take a visit, add your opinions, and also comment on my own Talk Page regarding all of this. PLEASE HELP.
History21 17:22, 22 June 2006 (UTC)History21
How do I e-mail you? What's your e-mail address? Please continue to discuss this on the two different talk pages. I am providing sources as quickly as I can, but I fear that many of the editors are simply unwilling to view them and listen to logic. One has even called the whole thing a complete hoax, despite the fact that I've already given nearly fifty different sources. Jehu Eyre, at least, has escaped deletion for now.
It all seems so silly; had I not inserted the term "dynasty," we wouldn't even be having this discussion in the first place. No one even glanced at the articles before then, and now there's this huge debate. We're going to need all the help we can get.
History21 03:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)History21
[edit] Death Valley Driver Video Review
TruthCrusader, you are welcomed to join into the discussion on the talk page, and myself and SirFozzie are engaged in a meditiation, but please do not continue to remove tags from this page.JB196 22:46, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] tags at DVDVR
I readded the tags at DVDVR with the hope that JB196 will remove them himself as the mediation process goes forward. Please consider giving that time before adding the tags again. I'd hate to see this turn into another fight like the previous AfDs.--Kchase02 T 07:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, as long as YOU re-added them and not him. To be honest, I do not trust JB196 to abide by anything that happens in mediation. This is a personal grudge for him and he wont stop until either he gets the article deleted or himself banned. But, I will honor your request. TruthCrusader 10:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rec sport pro-wrestling
I'm not familiar enough with the situation to really start an RfC, but if you create one in the near future, I'll be glad to certify it based on what I've seen in Rec.sport.pro-wrestling. I see you tried creating one in the past, but did get two users to certify. --Deathphoenix ʕ 01:20, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Battle of the Dneiper
Hi and thanks for your response.
I think I've already wrote just about everything in the project page, so I won't rewrite it all again.
I really appreciate that you accepted to mediate this case, and hope you will able to calm down some of the more radical POV-pushers...
Cheers, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 12:24, 1 July 2006 (UTC)