Talk:Treaty of Devol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Treaty of Devol article.
Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion topics go at the bottom of the page; click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Frequently asked questions. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Talk page guidelines Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Don't bite the newcomers!

This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and the next release version of Wikipedia. This History article has been rated FA-Class on the assessment scale.

Treaty of Devol is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.

Treaty of Devol appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 23, 2005.

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject History of Greece; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ..
FA	This article has been rated as FA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

The spoken word version of this article is part of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, an attempt to produce recordings of Wikipedia articles being read aloud. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and find out how to contribute.

[edit] Short

Changed 1054 (??) to 1097, the correct year. 13 Nov 2005

Thanks...that was some leftover vandalism from June 22-23, when it was on the main page. Adam Bishop 19:07, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

---

Fixed it, but no idea what was going on 24 June 2005

Have just checked the source text and the date in the first line (when the crusade started) is listed as 1054 1054 but comes out on my browser as 1654 - is there a fault? 24 June 2005

Is there a mismatch in the dates i.e. 1100's for the treaty then taliking about 1600's in the next paragraph, possibly a typo? 24 June 2005

Isn't this a bit too short to be a comprehensive FAC? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 20:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

How do you suggest it be made more comprehensive? Adam Bishop 22:17, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

An FAC doesn't have to be lengthy. This article seems to be very comprhenisve for something done in the 1100's. Falphin 18:40, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

219.130.58.19 has blanked this page numerous times today (Thu 23 June (EST))

Whoever has access to the encyclopedia/map from where the image was scanned, please scan it in in a much larger resolution and don't compress it so much (on this image the JPEG effects can be seen...)