Talk:Tommy Lee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

Contents

[edit] Greek

Thanks to whoever made this page! I had always wondered what ethnicity Tommy Lee is. -- Wikipedian2005 05:48, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Birthdate?

There seem to be some confusion about his birthdate. Wiki and IMDb says October 3, but VH1.com says it's March 10 [1] Any other reliable source? Thief12 03:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

His mother, I guess?

[edit] Relationships with Tommy Lee

Hello,

Relationships with Tommy Lee is meant to give the visitor a wide angle view of how Tommy Lee handles his relationships in essence and in practice. It also allows the visitor to examine the characteristics of his own relationships with Tommy Lee.

Both content and test are based on sound astrological knowledge and research which gained vast popularity among web surfers.

I believe that even though Astrology is not considered a mainstream science, these knowledge and compatibility tool should be made available to whomever wishes to study Tommy Lee as broadly as possible.

I have no desire to be considered a spammer and I don't want to force Top Synergy on the founders of Tommy Lee's article.

I ask you, authors of Tommy Lee that if you have an objection to placing a link to Relationships with Tommy Lee in the External Links section, please write it here. Else, I’ll place the link hoping that it would be a valid resource for Tommy Lee's fans and researchers.

With appreciation, Midas touch 05:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

In view of WP:NOT, scilicet, "Wikipedia is not a collection of external links" and "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", I think that we oughn't to include this link; I cannot imagine that the community writ large would consider an astrological analysis of Tommy Lee's compatability with Pamela Anderson to be encyclopedic. Though User:Midas touch has properly posed the question as to the propriety of the insertion of the link here, as properly suggested on his talk page, and though no one has objected to its inclusion in eight days, I can't abide one's inferring from the absence of such objection that the community writ large accede to the inclusion of the link. On his talk page, Midas touch well notes that, even were one to disprove entirely of the usage of astrology (especially astrology qua science), the link may nevertheless be of interest to those who desire to learn about Tommy Lee. Whilst surely this is true, were the satisfaction of that criterion sufficient to merit the inclusion of a link in an article, articles would become vast repositories of links. Finally, notwithstanding Midas touch's genial attitude and willingness to seek consensus, for which characteristics he is to be commended, it should be noted that his user page reveals him to be an employee or devotee of the site, which surely leads one to consider WP:SPAM. User:Hansnesse apparently requested general comment on the adding of the astrology links to sundry celebrity biographies, but I don't find any record of the discussion's having been moved to a talk page; it was likely deleted after having spent seven days in the pump archive. In any case, for the reasons enumerated supra, I am reverting the insertion of the link. Joe
Thank you, Joe for your answer and council. Have you not reverted the link, I would do it myself in complete respect to your position. One last note: you kind of used the fact that I'm affiliated with Top Synergy against me and even associated my activity with WP:SPAM. Contrary! While it's so easy to disguise one's identity and hide such affiliation, I make sure to maintain proper disclosure as a part of my codes of ethics. Midas touch 06:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

I assume good faith on the part of Midas touch. however, as I mentioned on the talkpage of Hasnesse, talkpages also get picked up by google and hence this approach can be used to carpet-bomb the articles' talkpages, thus increasing the number of google hits. I have gone through several of the proposed links and find that they all would be considered unencyclopedic. I suggest that he stop adding these requests and that someone blank out discussion about Topsynergy from all the talkpages that it has appeared in. TIA, --Gurubrahma 08:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Dear Gurubrahma, I already proposed to change the external linking template to NOFOLLOW so there won't be hidden motives to posting links other than their usefulness for the readers. Stop blaming me for intentions that do not exist and improve Wikipedia's functionality by advocating this proposal. Thanks, Midas touch 05:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Link Misdirect

The link in the discography for "Never a Dull Moment" goes to the Rod Stewart album of the same name. I'm not sure how to go about finding the correct entry, but I assume there rather is not one yet. I would like to leave it to someone else to fix this error correctly. Thanks. Decatur

[edit] male porn star

should we put him into this kind of category? Because even Paris Hilton is not in the category like female porn star. Hans

[edit] Sections

The biographical information (who he married, his kids, etc.) should be seperated from his professional history. 75.3.233.208 09:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I added link to official Motley Crue Website

I added an external link to the Offical Motley Crue website because the subject of the article is a founding and current member of the band and is currently on tour with them. The official site has further info about the subject of the Wikipedia article so I figure it should be here. Any objections? Monkeybreath 03:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia

Maybe I am alone in my belief that Wkipedia should be free of Trivia, and if that is so then I will fight the good fight. i will not remove the trivia section without discussion, however I implore discussion on this matter as soon as is possible. - Kaobear 19:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)