Talk:Tom Fox (activist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers), an attempt to better organise and unify articles relating to the Religious Society of Friends (Quakers). If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low-importance within Quakerism. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Tom Fox (peacemaker) → Tom Fox (activist) – Blatant POV move by User:Beardedbaby (as their first edit, no less). Recommend speedy revert to original title.
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Support, as "activist" more generic than (incorrectly lowercased) "peacemaker". David Kernow 12:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, as Tom Fox was part of the Christian Peacemaker Teams, not Christian Activist Teams. --Alojmm 12:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support Activist is more generic and neutral to me. "Peacemaker", while in the name of the orgisation, is somewhat POV, as self -titled group names often are. MartinRe 13:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Ahc 14:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain It was originally (peacemaker) and became (activist) without the necessary level of discussion; this should be used as an opportunity to discuss the merits of the clarification of 'which' Tom Fox the article refers to. However, I would support moving it back if there was some way to indicate that he was more than an activist, like perhaps "(aidworker)". Artsygeek 20:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
