Talk:Todd Beamer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was the subject of a previous vote for deletion. An archived record of the discussion can be found here.

[edit] Loose Change?

I hope nobody minds, but I'm removing the link to "Loose Change", a "9/11 documentary." When I hit the link, I see the description "A one hour analysis of 9/11 and how it is more likely than not that the government was actually behind the attacks." I'm not trying to censor, but this is pretty extreme conspiracy theory here. In any case, it's got nothing to do with Todd Beamer, so I'm taking it out. Staecker 17:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Terrorist Word

Hi everybody. I'm in any way in favor of the 9-11 hijackers, but in strict compilance with Wikipedias NPOV, I removed the word terrorists from the depictment of the final act made by Todd Beamer. Since no neutral (non-U.S.) enquire has been made, and so, no neutral entity has found a conection between Al-Qaeda and the United 93 hijackers, it's incorrect to call them terrorists. Also no formal terror organization acknowledge the attack, and no formal terror group claimed responsability (which ocurrs after every known terrorist attack). So it's just the words of the Washington, which has since eroded its credibility since the WMD haox in Iraq. Hope you understand. --200.78.252.50 19:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

This is unsupported. The idea that the only credible source that could establish the United 93 hijackers to Al Quaeda would be a non-U.S. source is fallacious. The FBI determined the identity of all 19 hijackers, and they were working for Al Quaeda and Osama bin Laden. Bin Laden even admitted his involvement in the attacks on videotape. The idea that the investigations that have gleaned all this information is somehow suspect because of the Bush Administration's unproven WMD allegations in Iraq is a non-sequitur. You might want to check out Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 attacks for more details. Nightscream 00:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)