User talk:TJ Spyke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Use of registered trademarks - PLAYSTATION®Network
Hi there, Sony Computer Entertainment has registered PLAYSTATION for the next generation consoles [1] - there's also an interview with Ken Kutaragi explaining all this in the PlayStation 3 article. I have added these details to the body instead on this page
Hgld 23:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by hgld (talk • contribs).
[edit] ECW December to Dismember
Well, I read on one of those backstage wrestling news sites that Hardcore Holly vs. The Sandman had been added to the card. I didn't check WWE.com, I just updated it after I read that. Sorry for the mistake.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs).
[edit] Just an angle and nothing to do with TNA?
Well, its just not an angle performed by VKM they were actually making fun of WWE and thats important for the future of the company isnt it? tell me why you deleted it? if what you say is right then i seriously dont mind moving that heading of VKM.
Thank You.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by OnceWalker (talk • contribs).
[edit] ROH Title
It seems that some editors have gone out of their way to push the ROH title as a recognized world heavyweight title. I have never seen anyone list that title as being recognized by anyone other than the fans and the promotion. Do you know anything about its status? youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 15:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Cyber Sunday
look the poster (wweshop.com)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by KingOfDX (talk • contribs).
[edit] Your talk page edit to WWE New Year's Revolution
Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- As a side note to go with it: your comments on the talk page don't need to be so rude. It's not needed to copy the same thing with your opinion inserted into it. No one is making you post, so how about not posting if you don't agree with comments? The matter is solved, the poster was real. Life goes on. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Armageddon
Okay, but the Batista/King Booker match from Survivor Series was listed on WWE.com below about 5 matches, but was the main-event of Survivor Series. Explain that to me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs) 22:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC).
Okay, but don't you think a Undertaker/Mr. Kennedy match is bigger than a Kane/MVP match because 1. the Undertaker/Kennedy feud is the bigger of the two and 2. Together, Undertaker and Kennedy are the bigger stars than Kane and MVP.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs).
Whatever, dude. I'm sick of fighting. You obviously will never listen.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs).
Fine, we're not fighting, but I'm sick of talking to you. And who are you to tell me what I can and what I can't post? Do you run that page or something?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by RYANonWIKIPEDIA (talk • contribs).
- There is no policy on the match order (or which wrestler is listed first: except for champions), so it can be done however. There isn't a good reason to make it look like WWE's official site, seeing as how the order will change once the event actually takes place. A WWE upcoming event is not much different than an upcoming movie or video game. All three things are coming out in the future. Look at those articles: they aren't just in the same order that's listed on official sites previewing the movie or game. RobJ1981 19:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] SummerSlam (2007)
That WWE Affiliate website [2] lists the SummerSlam 2007 PPV taking place from the Continental Arena. You might want to edit that on the PPV's page. The login and password can be found on User talk:149.84.147.134. ThatsHowIRoll 00:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. TJ Spyke 00:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ECW December To Dismember
Can you give me the ECW DTD results? Please KingOfDX 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ECW World Heavyweight Championship or ECW World Championship?
There is an ongoing debate that you might want to take a look at. See Talk:ECW World Heavyweight Championship. Just thought you should know...-- bulletproof 3:16 03:45, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] RE: Rated-RKO
I did fix the redirects. I moved the page from Rated RKO to Rated-RKO. Check the redirects for the former, and you'll see no redirect pages. Cheers, -- THLRCCD 02:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought that only the actual redirect pages needed to be fixed. I'll take care of it now. Cheers, -- THLRCCD 04:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your talk page edit to WWE New Year's Revolution
Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- As a side note to go with it: your comments on the talk page don't need to be so rude. It's not needed to copy the same thing with your opinion inserted into it. No one is making you post, so how about not posting if you don't agree with comments? The matter is solved, the poster was real. Life goes on. RobJ1981 22:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your talk page edit to WWE Armageddon
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RobJ1981 04:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wii article
Hello.
We're currently both at 2 reverts. Regardless, I won't be hitting a third. I wouldn't suggest that you do, either.
But please keep this in mind. I've shown good faith by giving people time to discuss before making the changes.
I've stated that all you need to do is provide a proper citation that Nintendo doesn't know their own intended market.
If you state that it is competing, but Nintendo believes otherwise, then you are conclusively stating that Nintendo is wrong. You need to back that up with a citation.
Forcing uncited and unverifiable statements into an article can never be appropriate. Please stop this immediately. Bladestorm 22:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- It actually isn't fair at all. (don't get me wrong, I appreciate the desire for compromise) You directly state that it is in competition with the 360 and PS3. And then you state that Nintendo doesn't agree. Those statements combine unequivocally state that Nintendo is flat-out wrong about their own market. That must be properly verified and sourced. Otherwise, it's just conjecture, or Original Research. It can't stay in the absence of proper citation. And I honestly can't imagine how you could possibly find a citation directly (and reliably) stating that Nintendo doesn't know what they're doing with the wii.
- Think of it this way, it is appealing to a different market. Countless people who have given up on videogames still have interest in the wii. You have to back it up. If you're going to make an assertion that's under dispute, and that directly accuses Nintendo of not knowing their own market, then you need to back it up. Bladestorm 22:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
OH, THAT last compromise. meh. I guess that's fine. Bladestorm 22:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Progress
Hi, I would just like to ask something. I was just wondering, could you give me a basic summery of how I have been doing as an editor and what I can do to improve? Your an experienced editor, so i thought i'd ask you. Killswitch Engage
- Other than a few mistakes (which are natural for any new editor), you've done a prett good job. TJ Spyke 02:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Do you have any advice on how I can improve? Answer on talk page. Killswitch P.S. I'm gonna take this oppertunity to apolligise for being an ass early on. I'm really trying to change.
[edit] WWE Deaths
I agree that the format might have been wrong with many of the wrestlers having not been in the WWE, but I think some type of article should be written on the many premature deaths with pro-wrestlers and drug use. I see that you have more experience in these matters and ask you to think about the format or perhaps creation of such an article, thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.167.255.231 (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] WWE Armageddon 2006
Update please!. KingOfDX 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- In case you didn't see it (what I posted on the talk page): "I don't see that as much of a compromise: seeing as how when matches are announced, that's how they are listed on WWE and TNA websites (with the main event being the only exception to that alot of the time). But I will agree to it, as long as it works for all PPV pages. It's a start at least, but I still think something new should be figured out for PPV pages as a Wrestling Project policy of some sort."
So as long as that's agreed to, the page should be unprotected as soon as it can. That way people can stop complaining about not updating. Even though it's not a big deal either way, Wikipedia isn't the only site on the internet for information. People really need to be calm about protection, and not overreact so much on the talk page. RobJ1981 18:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wii Controversy
Why is it reverted? There are legal issues with the Wii, even much before its launch. Frankyboy5 22:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Virtual Console "Official Logo"
Why did you repost the logo and caption? That is not the Official logo for the Virtual Console page? whoever put it up there just went to the wii.com virtual console page and copied a banner onto the main page! That isn't its logo! Mike24 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] GT Cube/GT Pro Series merge
Hi, I responded to your own response on Talk:GT Cube a few days ago. Just notifying you of this so you can respond again and we can hopefully come to an agreement/consensus (if it can even be called a consensus with just two people). Thanks, Nova Prime 06:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unforgiven 2002...
Any reason why did you deleted my edit? That is a fact, though, haven't you seen the PPV? Taker did threw Lesnar through the Unforgiven logo...--Dekabreak101 19:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
I think he should be included if he actually won the title. Why doesn't WWE recognize him as a champion in the first place? -- Mikedk9109 (hit me up) 22:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] WWE Triple Crown
User:Moe Epsilon, who quit Wikipedia immediately after, told me that the US Championship doesn't count towards a Triple Crown, but the IC does. Is this true? Cheers, -- THLR 01:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- He thinks it doesn't, I think it does. The truth is that we don't know for sure one way or the other. TJ Spyke 01:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: Feuds
Says who?
- WP is not a wrestling website. This has been discussed before by WP:PW. It's usually only mentioned in a PPV article if it was major (check the WrestleMania XX article for an example). TJ Spyke 22:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Not this again
As I read a Raw report (since I didn't see the show), I saw no references to matches announced for New Year's Revolution. Why did you agree to that compromise if the match order is staying the same way it always has? It's an exact copy of WWE.com. I realize the website announces matches before they do on TV sometimes, but this is going against the compromise either way. Unless I see proof they announced it on TV in that order, the page should probably be protected. Compromising, then going against it... is just unacceptable. The compromise wasn't just for Armageddon, and I clearly said it should be for all PPV pages. Agreement was reached I thought, but I guess not. RobJ1981 05:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- As a side note: I re-read what you posted on the talk page... it was about when the matches were announced, but nothing to do with TV or website. So the compromise was basically a trick to keep it the same? I don't appreciate that. If I need to get several pages protected due to this, I guess I will need to. There is simply no excuse for this. A WWE copy is pointless, and people can see wwe.com for that preview, not Wikipedia. Considering matches are confirmed on the website first, that order will usually dominate the article then. That is not how things should happen... again. RobJ1981 05:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Get the pages protected? You seem to be the one who wants to control the articles. Whoever gave you that RAW report was wrong because 2 matches were announced on RAW tonight (the tag match and the IC Title match). Listing matches in the order they are made official is the most NPOV stance, and I don't understand how you can't see that. Also, most WWE matches are announced on TV first, it's TNA that usually announced most matches online first. TJ Spyke 05:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I would appreciate it
if, should you stumble across a nomination of mine in the future, that you not accuse me of bad faith. I explained more than once in the nomination why I made it, and the nomination was made for exactly the reasons I stated. Maintaining civility requires that I not specify exactly which of your bodily orifices I would like you to cram your bullshit accusation into, so I'll leave it at that. Otto4711 16:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
