User:Tintin1107/Tied odis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In some ODIs, the team that had lost fewer wickets would be declared the winner if the scores ended exactly level. This was the case in two further matches:
Date | Batting first | Score (overs) | Batting second | Score (overs) | At | Link |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20 March 1987 | India | 212-6 (44) | Pakistan | 212-7 (44) | Hyderabad (India) | [29] |
14 October 1988 | Australia | 229-8 (45) | Pakistan | 229-7 (45) | Lahore | [30] |
[edit] Notes
- ↑ The series ended 1-1 with one match tied. For the purpose of deciding the winner of the series, England were considered as the winner of this match as they lost fewer wickets.
- ↑ Asif Mujtaba hit the last ball from Steve Waugh for six when Pakistan needed seven runs to win.
- ↑ The crowd invaded the ground while the last ball was in still in play. West Indies scored the two runs that they needed to win but the match referee Raman Subba Row intervened to declare the match a tie.
- ↑ India needed two runs off the last ball with one wicket in hand. Eddo Brandes bowled a wide (which tied the scores), the batsmen attempted a bye and Robin Singh was runout ending the innings.
- ↑ Australia needed three runs in the last ball. The batsmen ran two but a crowd invasion of the ground prevented them for scoring the winning run or the fielders from completing a runout.
- ↑ 1999 Cricket World Cup semi-final.
- ↑ Sri Lanka collapsed from 157 for 1 to 196 allout
- ↑ Duckworth-Lewis method. The scores were tied before the last ball but unaware of this, the batsmen did not attempt to score.
- ↑ Pakistan was 211 for 6 before the last ball. Abdul Qadir was runout going for the second run and India won as they had lost fewer wickets. Had the batsmen not attempted the second run, both teams would have finished on 212 for 6 and Pakistan would have won as they had a higher score after 25 overs.