Thomas E. Klocek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
Please discuss this issue on the talk page or replace this tag with a more specific message. This article has been tagged since November 2006.

Thomas E. Klocek is a former adjunct professor at DePaul University fired for arguing with Muslim and Palestinian students outside the classroom.

His case has drawn the attention of ardent supporters of free speech, who believe Professor Klocek is a victim of "political correctness."

1 Overview
2 Klocek's career at DePaul
3 Klocek's views
4 Students for Justice in Palestine
5 Brief Outline of the Incident
6 Aftermath
7 Blogosphere
8 External links

[edit] Overview

Klocek was an instructor at DePaul University for the School of New Learning. He had taught at DePaul for 15 years and was a well-regarded instructor. His firing stemmed from an incident involving activists from Students for Justice in Palestine, and "United Muslims Moving Ahead" (both of which are pro-Palestinian). Klocek disagreed with the content of the groups' leaflets and confronted the activists. The debate became more heated, with the students (allegedly) comparing Israel to Nazi Germany, and Klocek (allegedly) saying that the Palestinians did not exist and were a 20th-century construct. The argument ended when Klocek made an allegedly obscene hand gesture at the students and left.

On September 24, 2004, Klocek received notice from Dean Susan Dumbleton that he was being suspended with pay, due to complaints stemming from the incident. (The incident occurred on September 14.) Klocek, displeased with this, appealed the decision and demanded a hearing. When his efforts proved fruitless, he sued the school on the grounds of breach of contract and defamation. Klocek's claims for breach of contract were dismissed with prejudice on January 30, 2006, but the defamation claims were allowed to proceed to trial.

[edit] Klocek's career at DePaul

Klocek did not have a PhD, but instructed students as a part-time adjunct professor at the School for New Learning, a part of DePaul that specializes in instructing older students (age 26 and above). The classes that Klocek taught covered a variety of topics ranging from writing to "Critical Thinking." He was held in very high esteem by the school and had an exemplary record for 15 years. Klocek's area of expertise was Slavic languages and Literatures, particularly Russian and Old Slavic, and he was also working on a doctoral thesis through the University of Chicago on "Logos and its Impact on the Development of Medieval Slavic Culture."[1]

[edit] Klocek's views

Klocek, who is Catholic, is concerned with the condition of Christians in the Middle East, who, he thinks, are treated unfairly. He is also sympathetic toward Israel though, as far as can be ascertained from his statements, he is not a Zionist.

His view that the area now known as Palestine is a 20th-century construct is consistent with the arbitrary partition of Ottoman territories following World War I and is generally accepted by pro-Palestinian historians.

[edit] Students for Justice in Palestine

An activist group based at UC Berkeley, it advocates "...the full decolonization of all illegally held Palestinian lands; the end of the Israeli occupation of the Gaza Strip and the West Bank; including East Jerusalem; the implementation of the right of return and repatriation for all Palestinian refugees to their original homes and properties; and an end to what is calls "the Israeli system of Apartheid and discrimination against the indigenous Palestinian population." - SJP Mission Statement Part II

[edit] Brief Outline of the Incident

Strangely, many of the facts of what was said are not in great dispute between the two parties. They both agree that Klocek approached the SJP booth and disagreed with them, saying, "You know, there's more than one perspective on the Middle East conflict. You're only presenting one side here."

This sparked a debate between Klocek and the students, and at this point accounts differ. The students allege that Klocek interrupted them and used profanity; Klocek admits to raising his voice but denies using profanity. The students described Klocek as being arrogant and abrasive: Nassar said, "We tried engaging Professor Klocek in conversation but he kept interrupting us and did not allow us to answer any of his questions." Also, "he continuously referred to Palestinians as 'those people' and went on to say that Palestinians 'do not exist.'" (From the Chicago Jewish News.) Nasser also said that Klocek made statements such as, "there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, you are all fanatics." (From The Depaulia.) The article stated that he continued "making derogatory comments regarding the validity of the Palestinian nation."

Klocek had a different story. According to his version, one of the women at the table informed him that she was a Palestinian. "She got up from the table and said, you know, the Palestinians are being treated by Israelis the same way Hitler treated the Jews. I took umbrage...I told her that was an absolutely scurrilous statement, an absolute lie. I said that I believe the Israeli armed forces have exercised very careful restraint in their responses to what has been almost daily suicide bombings. There is a big difference between (Israelis) targeting a terrorist and someone strapped with bombs going in to a cafe or a seder and blowing up people." (From the Chicago Jewish News.)

The Chicago Jewish News also wrote, "Then, Klocek said, "the UMMA people began to come over. It was eight against one. A very spirited conversation" ensued. As he walked away, Klocek said, "students began coming after me, and I thumbed my chin at them. It's an Italian New Jersey expression meaning, 'I'm finished,' 'I'm out of here.'""

[edit] Aftermath

Angered over the incident the student-activists circulated an e-mail calling for Klocek to be punished. Dean Susan Dumbelton met with the students and discussed the incident. She did not meet with Klocek before informing him that he was being suspended with pay for the fall. At the same time The DePaulia published an article about the incident, which did not incorporate Klocek's version because he would not speak to the newspaper. Klocek also claimed that Dumbelton asked him not to contact The DePaulia, though DePaul denies that this suggestion was made.

The University and Klocek attempted to reconcile their differences, but were unsuccessful. Frustated by what he felt were unreasonable demands, Klocek sued the school for defamation of character and for breach of contract. His lawsuit is based on claims that the school violated his contract by not giving him a fair hearing and by slandering him in the media: the Northwest Herald wrote: "Klocek also contends that DePaul officials breached their contract with him by not giving him a proper hearing, denied him academic freedom and improperly disclosed private information by referring publicly to medical issues they said affected his classroom performance." [2]

The University has not publicly commented on the lawsuit to the media.

Klocek's claims for breach of contract were dismissed with prejudice (meaning that the court found them meritless and they cannot be refiled) on January 30, 2006. The court did not rule on his other claims but instead transferred them to a different division of the court.

[edit] Blogosphere

The Klocek case (but not the recent partial dismissal of his case) has gained a lot of attention in the conservative blogoshpere: conservative bloggers have followed his case very closely and are angered by his treatment. They feel that schools are censoring those who disagree with the "left-wing agenda"; they contrast Klocek's treatment with that of controversial Colorado professor Ward Churchill (a paid speaker at DePaul in 2005) and DePaul's hiring of Norman G. Finkelstein.