User talk:TheCoffee/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

If you want to contact me, or continue a discussion in this archive, please do so at my talk page.


Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Etimbo | Talk 15:12, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Philippine provinces

Hi! Wow, it seems you have finished off the work of converting all the rest of the provinces to the new template (well, at least those for which you have the provincial seals). Welcome to Wikipedia! :) —seav 23:50, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Seav! I've seen your name all over the Philippine topics. I have the provincial seals for all the provinces except Compostela Valley, Sarangani, and Zamboanga Sabugay, I'll be putting them up as well as the infobox templates as I have time. Glad to be contributing. :) TheCoffee 01:55, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Star Wars

Any insight as to why some people say Star Wars is more of a "western" than science fiction?

---o0o---

You can take any kind of story and put it on any kind of setting. As you are probably aware Kurosawa put a western story in Japan with excellent results.

In the current definition on the next page we say.

  1. The clothes on your back.
  2. Your gun, and
  3. Your horse.

Star Wars people could be said to have all of these. They had clothes, they had guns, and they had horsepower. Western films are period art. What I think is also common to most westerns is the spectacular landscape, which was probably correct in parts of Star Wars also.

Back to the Future, depicted the nineteenth, early twentieth century “Old West,” period authentically, Star Wars did not. If I remember Battle Beyond the Stars (1980) was a Sci-Fi remake of a western.

We cannot let any story that has the basic ingredients of a western be a Western. The first real movie was a western; practically every movie takes from that in some way. Only westerns have the “Old West,” period and locations. Almost any story with these will “look,” like a western. That is not to say you cannot have a western in the future. Futureworld pulls it off, being a western in the future. The Western part of the story holds true to the locations and western period and of course it had a traditional gunslinger.

Popular westerns are heavily grounded in 19th century reality. Westerns with the supernatural or that suspend belief with magic, are very unpopular. The public does not appear to accept fantasy westerns as westerns unless they are cartoons. Look at it like this. You see the thing that many people forget is that these are picture stories. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck.

When you are channel surfing with the sound off, can you tell within a few frames, the difference between a western, and a Sci-Fi flick?

If you can, then you probably know what a western movie looks like. Star Wars does not "Look," like a western. GT

[edit] Henry Jenkins

Thanks for the copy edit. Stirling Newberry 14:23, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines

Hello, you might be interested in helping flesh-out the Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines page, so that we can centralize our efforts in improving Philippine-related articles. :) —seav 00:06, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MIT

Hi, is there a specific reason behind bypassing MIT redirects? Because [[MIT]] is easier to read in the wikicode than [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology|MIT]], and so I would argue we should keep the former unless there's a good reason otherwise. — Matt Crypto 11:03, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I just figured it's more efficient to bypass the redirect, and guard against the possibility that the MIT page is turned into a disambiguation page. I never thought of it as cluttering the Wikicode... Anyway, I'll stop. It's not necessary anyway. TheCoffee

[edit] Image:Quake.jpg

Hi, regarding Image:Quake.jpg, is there a reason that you uploaded a smaller version of the image? It has notably less detail than the previous one. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo 02:51, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hmm...it was the weirdest thing. I was looking at the images of the 1906 quake and when I saw quake.jpg, it appeared to be vandalized because I saw a screenshot from the Quake video game. I just found a new one and uploaded it... but now that I look at the image history, it seems that it was never vandalized. Must have been a problem with my cache, or Wikipedia's cache... in any case, I reverted it. Sorry! --TheCoffee 04:39, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ah.. There *was* a Quake screenshot at Quake.jpg, but I believe it was deleted at some point, and then the current image uploaded. I saw a cached copy of the original screenshot this week also. Something in the wikipedia cache must be out of date. Thanks for the info. --ChrisRuvolo 07:06, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Movie Infobox

You haven't replied yet: Template talk:Infobox Movie#Awards and Series fields Cburnett 06:53, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Replied. TheCoffee 07:45, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

FYI: I moved the nomination to the top, since Please add all nominations and self-nominations to the top of this list.. Nice picture. -- Chris 73 Talk 09:30, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks :) TheCoffee 09:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mi Último Adiós

Keep up the good work! Your image on Corazon Aquino is highly appreciated. I just would like your participation on the Vfd of Mi Ultimo Adios, please vote to keep or move to wikisource. There should be a brief description about it and it 's significance.--Jondel 05:11, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:RE-Plan-Risk.png

Hi there. You licensed the above image as 'GDFL.' While this template redirects to the one for the GFDL, we're not compltely sure of the legal implications of this, so I'd really appreciate it if you could change the template from {{GDFL}} to {{GFDL}}. Thanks a lot! -Frazzydee|✍ 00:10, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. Somehow I didn't notice this message when you first posted it... in any case, it seems you fixed that up for me. Thanks. :) TheCoffee

[edit] College of Commerce

The deleted content was not copyrighted and is in fact explicitly public domain.

[edit] Featured pic
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Walt Whitman edit 2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

[edit] University of San Carlos logo

Is superb! Keep up the good work!--Jondel 02:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks :) TheCoffee 05:02, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] pope infobox

I'm disappointed that Gerald's infobox has been replaced by what I consider to be an ugly, inferior design. I've asked people to vote on it. Please drop by at Template talk:Infobox pope. FearÉIREANN 22:43, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

FYI - I really liked the new Pope Infobox so I have proposed that it be used for all religious leades on Infobox policy. There have been no objections so far (since Friday). If that continues I plan on helping to update the articles for the new Infobox. If you have comments, concerns please discuss there Trödel|talk 17:37, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Locator Map

It's a very good effort. :) The fonts I've used are ITC Officina Sans and Adobe Sans MM. I like Officina Sans in particular but it's not free. I forgot how I got it in the first place. :) Anyway, I think we should use a common font instead so that anyone can easily create graphics. --seav 05:15, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sex and intelligence

Hi -- I re-inserted the POV notice to the above-named article. Its purpose was well-discussed on the talk page but you may have missed it. I reiterated the problem with the article in a separate section on it, now; it is fairly specific. --Fastfission 02:22, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Alrighty then... TheCoffee 06:13, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hey, thanks so much. I am not actually new, coz I used to do some work without an account, but eventually I registered, so I can focus on the crisis thing, my first article. I hope you don't mind checking Philippine electoral crisis, 2005. I tried to be as NPOV as possible, pero, I still think that it still not enough. Feel free to fix it. Ok, I'll go na, antok kasi. --Noypi380 17:30, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stub articles for Philippine cities/municipalities

Hi - I see you've just done a huge number of stub articles on Philippine places. If you're planning to do any more, could you please mark them with {{Philippines-geo-stub}} - it'll save work for someone further down the track re-categorising them! Thanks! Grutness...wha? 03:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sure thing. A question though... Eventually I want all those articles to look like this: Amlan, Negros Oriental, complete with list of barangays (local city/town divisions) and a locator map. Would you still consider that article a stub? TheCoffee 04:42, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
That's less stubby, but it still looks like quite qa bit like a stub. It needs a bit more text than the vital statistics and a list of barayas: perhaps a couple of sentences about the history of the place, what the name means, main industry, whether the population's all near the coast, any important features... that sort of thing. It doesn't need to be very long - have a look at the description of Lakewood, Zamboanga del Sur for an example of something that is beyond the stub stage, although it would be good if that had a map and list like your articles. San Isidro, Davao Oriental is better still, but you wouldn't need as much description as that unless you really felt keen on writing! Grutness...wha? 09:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Alright, I'll put {{Philippines-geo-stub}} on all those new generated articles (except the ones with other significant information}}. Thanks! TheCoffee 09:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks to you, for making the articles in the first place! :) Grutness...wha? 11:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Yes, Coffee, thanks for adding the articles and the stubs :) --MarSch 17:36, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks! :) TheCoffee 18:05, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wow… I must say… That's the most appearances of new articles I have ever seen in the Recent changes. It's just a flood… and they're all by you! Nice work, I must say. → JarlaxleArtemis 21:38, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Yeah... well, I hope I'm not making too much of a mess on Recent Changes. :p The articles are for Philippine cities and municipalities. They're all pre-generated from some census data that I have, so I just need to copy and paste to fill in the blanks for the 1500+ articles. And I'm not quite a bot, so until my project is done, I'll be around to clutter up Recent Changes. Hmm... perhaps I should add a note on my user page... TheCoffee 21:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] You submitted the 600,000 article

Well, as near as I can tell. I was watching [1] as the counter turned to 600,000, and reckon that Poona Bayabao, Lanao del Sur was the 600,000th. Certainly one of your articles was, because you submitted lots and lots of articles at much the same time. So well done, and thank you. I've posted an announcement. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Woo hoo! I was aiming for the 600,000th article. :) TheCoffee 05:04, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Agusan del Norte maps

Hmmm... I've been browsing around a bit and noticed that you spelled Remedios wrongly in its Media:Ph_locator_agusan_del_norte_remidios_t._romualdez.png locator map. Also, Gingoog Bay is misspelled in all the locator maps. :)

Grabe... Ang sipag mo... I barely have time to do my hobbies much less contribute to Wikipedia. Anyway, keep up the good work. Congrats on making the 600,000 article. (Hehe, I think your next target is to become the most active Filipino contributor.) :) --seav 14:34, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hehe, it's just that I have a lot of free time now that I've gone from student to "unemployed". :p I don't want to keep this up forever. It's not healthy. :/ Thanks for pointing out that misspelling, I'll get around to fixing that. :) TheCoffee 01:39, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Commons

Grabe talaga! TheCoffee you're the man. Actually, I'm here to ask if you could post the maps you made on the commons so that we can readily use them on the Tagalog Wikipedia and other projects. -- Blue Mask|Talk 18:12, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. :) I have to admit, I'm not very familiar with the Commons system, but I'm absolutely willing to have them uploaded there. Right now we have 376 city/municipality locator maps, including the ones made by Seav. Then theres the 79 province locator maps, 16 region locator maps, and the various Philippine maps... seems like a lot of work... :p --TheCoffee 05:41, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WP:CSB

I just read your comment on the vfd to history of United States Imperialism; would you mind to have a look at this? WP:CSB Lectonar 6 July 2005 13:12 (UTC)

Sure, I've read it before... TheCoffee 6 July 2005 14:57 (UTC)

[edit] Question about editing Wikipedia

Hello TheCoffee - I think you deleted something I added to a page about me today - I guess because I'm not authorized to edit it (yet?). I was wondering how I can get something added to this page? Email me at Ventrella@Earthlink.net. Thank you very much! -Jeffrey Ventrella

[edit] Thanks

Hey thanks again. If you need some help in some article, don't hesistate to ask. --Noypi380 05:04, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

No problem. :) It's hard to stay neutral when it comes to that topic...everyone's getting emotional, nobody's thinking with their head anymore. You're doing a good job, keep it up. :) TheCoffee 05:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

The mop is mine!
Enlarge
The mop is mine!

Thanks for voting in my RfA; I promise I'll wield my sacred mop with care. If you ever need me for anything, you know where to find me. Thanks again! -- Essjay · Talk 15:23, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

That's a lot of thanks you're giving out. :) That was actually my first time to go over there and actually vote at RfA, but you seemed especially deserving. Congratulations! TheCoffee 15:28, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stop putting the delete tag on Lisa Shock

If you want something about which to be upset check the Sashanan entry which is at best harrassment and at worst Libel and Slander. Lisa Shock is a noted figure in the videogame industry.

The Sashanan article is a completely different issue that I have no involvement in, but since you brought it up, I looked over it and voted for its deletion. I put the delete tag on the Lisa Shock article because it doesn't assert importance, which makes it a candidate for speedy deletion. The only hint of notability on that page is that she works for Rolling Stone Magazine and she's a moderator on an internet forum. That doesn't seem notable at all to me. In any case, you should not remove the speedy deletion tag, as it says you shouldn't remove it from an article you created yourself. TheCoffee 08:23, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

I didn't remove the speedy delete tag. And thanks for judging my entry as unimportant. I found quite a few of your articles un-notable yet I was somehow able to resist marking them for speedy deletion. I created that entry because as someone involved in the online videogame community, I have seen quite a bit of "Who is Lisa Shock"-type questions and wanted to add the information to the wikipedia so that people would have a reference. Frankly, it is arrogant of you to assume that I removed the tag myself. Furthermore, it incenses me that you have arrogated to yourself (someone from whose contributions doesn't seem at all in touch with the videogame industry or community) the jury for an article I spent some time writing. Shame. 132.239.153.57 18:04, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

  • Apologies - I was unaware of the lofty standards for inclusion in the wikipedia. I have withdrawn my oposition to removal.
That's alright, we all learn by experience. :) And I'm sorry I thought it was you that removed the delete tag, I just saw that it was an anonymous IP and I made the wrong assumption. Right now it's at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Lisa_Shock for people to vote on keeping it or not. If it's deleted, don't that that discourage you. Happy editting... TheCoffee 04:56, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Getting rid of listcruft

Hey. I just saw the comment from you in the "List of Novels" VFD about all those ridiculous "List of song" quasi-articles. I've been getting more and more annoyed with such listcruft, since as I see it those lists aren't even articles, let alone encyclopedic ones belonging on Wikipedia, and it seems like every one of them (I'd guess 9 out of every 10 articles on Wikipedia with the word "list" in their titles, at least) is a blatant violation of WP:NOT An Indiscriminate Collection of Information. So, over at Wikipedia talk:Lists I've started discussion about a brainstorm I had during an earlier VFD for some listcruft, where I'm thinking it might be good to propose a policy that articles containing only a list, with no other content, must be deleted. Seems to me anything that's an appropriate list to be on Wikipedia is going to have associated information that can form a couple of paragraphs to go with it in the article; everything else is "List of songs with lists in the lyrics." Anyway, from that comment of yours, I thought you might want to take a look at that discussion. The Literate Engineer 08:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Well, I wouldn't go that far. I think there are many lists that are useful on Wikipedia and they help keep the articles closely connected. For example, List of cities in California helped me find Sebastopol, California. And to be honest I'm not that fond of the category system, though I cooperate with the system anyway. But I agree that stuff like List of songs about body parts goes over the line and makes Wikipedia look like a joke, and I'd be glad to help out in setting guidelines to prevent things from getting out of hand. :) TheCoffee 15:44, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Original Pilipino Music and Music of the Philippines

Hi, I was browsing around the site today and noticed that Original Pilipino Music needed to be cleaned up, so I cleaned it up and made Philippine music a disambig for that article and Music of the Philippines. I was wondering, though, if what I added to that article is correct, and if OPM is different enough from what's covered in Music of the Philippines to need its own article. Google says that OPM is notable on its own, but if those two articles are about the same thing, they should be merged somehow. So if you would, please take a look at it and give your input. Thanks! --Idont Havaname 03:59, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Well, I'm not an expert on music, but I think those belong in seperate articles. Your cleanup of Original Pilipino Music is right, it's a term for any contemporary music my anyone with Philippine decent. With "Music of the Philippines", I'd get the impression that that article would be for folk music throughout the history of the Philippines. Actually, if anything, I think OPM is a subset of Music of the Philippines. TheCoffee 04:54, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The return of toccolours

See Template:Infobox Pope. This systematic attempt to get rid of beauty on the wiki offends me and I hope that simple, elegant designs such as yours can survive. 64.12.112.186 10:40, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RFA

Salamat sa pagboboto sa akin.--Jondel 05:25, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Good luck with adminship. ;) Coffee 04:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Will it play in Peoria?

Thank you for the help! (Saw the redirect assistance to a new page I created.) -- Barrettmagic 09:40, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

No problem. :) Coffee 04:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Barbara Nessim

I notice you speedied the above article. A quick google search would have established her notability, which could then have been added to the article just as quickly as the speedy template. Steve block talk 21:29, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Ah, alright. Well, thanks for expanding it. As it stood, the article looked like it very well could have been vanity. Anyway, I'll be more careful next time... Coffee 04:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wigwag photos

Yes, please do delete them. Although I had permission from the webmaster whose site these were posted at, they didn't belong to him and weren't compatible with the GFDL license. Thanks for letting me know. I'd forgotten about these! - Lucky 6.9 05:19, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] changing

A user has been unilaterally waging edit wars to change Template:Infobox Pope to a version he wants. Your comments would be welcome. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 00:45, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Demographics

Keep up the good work! One of my big todo tasks which I kept putting off.--Jondel 07:04, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Friendly Chat

I awarded you with a barnstar because of your great work and dedication to Filipino related articles. I will also vote for you because you have the makings of a great admin. Good luck Tony the Marine 05:01, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Hey, thank you very much for the barnstar. I will wear it proudly! The time (..and name) was a bit off when you posted it, but I've fixed that to correspond to the time you added it to the page. Thanks again, and thanks for your support at WP:RFA. :) Coffee 08:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your RfA

Your namesake
Enlarge
Your namesake

...Folgers is good to the last drop...I say you are too, and I offer sincere support to you on your nomination, and hope dearly that you become an adm.

Also, I will award you this Barnstar of Diligence for your diligent efforts on Wikipedia.

Image:Barnstar3.png

Take care,[User:Dbraceyrules|D. J. Bracey]] (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the award! Three barnstars and adminship in one month... :) Coffee 04:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Adminship congratulations

You're an admin. Check out the advice, and best wishes. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Congrats, best of luck. – Friejose 20:39, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
    Thanks very much, I'll be a good admin. :) Coffee 04:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Congratulations, Coffee. I'm sure you'll make a great admin. --NormanEinstein 15:08, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Congrats on your adminstratorhip! Enjoy your superpowers.--Jondel 04:59, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! Yes, I operate on WP:RFA as much as I can; I consider it to be almost as important as VfD. Ave atque vale, --Merovingian (t) (c) 06:42, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • Maligayang bati at wala'y sapayan! :-) --Chris S. 07:42, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes congratulations and good luck! I know you'll do what you can to make Wikipedia better and do a great service for the community here. See you 'round the wiki! Hamster Sandwich 16:23, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Congratulations! FeloniousMonk 22:24, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
  • You're so cute! I actually know what you mean. Keep in mind that successful RFAs are good things to look back on make you feel better about yourself during the rough times. :) Dmcdevit·t 06:09, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • Congrats! Finally we discover that TheCoffee is SuperCoffee! :) --Noypi380 01:28, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
  • No problem. Congratulations, you perky cup of sludge! ;) Sorry, I'm more of a soda drinker. Acetic Acid 08:31, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
  • Congrats! ≈ jossi ≈ 23:08, August 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Empire Strikes Back article

There is a huge dispute over at that article, in which I'm involved. I suggest you go over there and shorten that plot summary as well, like you did Revenge of the Sith. By the way, if you haven't noticed already, I moved the plot summary under the opening crawl. Adamwankenobi 01:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

What do you know, I actually already started shortening that plot summary. That one is the longest, approaching 3000 words. I'm quite pleased with the length of the ROTS plot summary, so I'll try to get them all to about the same length. Coffee 04:53, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
I think it's fine now. But there are still many flaws, such as the cast list, which Adam refuses to let go of. I request that you help fight off this Starcruft, despite that you may be a fan.
And yes, I am a GameFAQs member, but you never saw me on LUE. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:36, August 28, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IFD

Hi Coffee. Thanks for helping out on WP:IFD. But please read the instructions at WP:IFD#Instructions for administrators. Non-orphans (for example, Image:Breast.jpg) aren't deleted at IFD. dbenbenn | talk 17:38, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Ah, alright. Thanks! Coffee 17:47, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I actually SAW you become an admin

I saw the count was nearing 700K so I rapid refreshed for a screenshot. Then I saw the admin count go up by one o.O Redwolf24 18:16, 25 August 2005 (UTC)

Haha... cool. My adminship coincides with the creation of the 700,000th article. o_o Coffee 09:11, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Response

It's a well-written section, but it shouldn't eliminate the need for watching the movie. A plot summary should be short and sweet, and it should just set them up for the full plot to be shown to them in the movie. - A Link to the Past (talk) 21:23, August 25, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re:Touchwall

Skyring emailed me the same question (he cannot post directly since he's under a one year ban), below I've quoted my response to the question, if you have any further questions about this please leave me a note on my talk page. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 05:43, August 26, 2005 (UTC)


Believe me it was probably one of the tougher decisions I had to make on FPC and it definately is a great picture and it adds a lot to the article, however even though I'm pretty lose on what constitutes consensus I did not feel that there was a great consensus to promote, even though it was extremely close.

-Jtkiefer


Skyring wrote:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/TouchWall > > It might not be the best picture in the world, but it received 11 Support votes and 5 Oppose and I'd like to know why you didn't promote it, please! > > Yours aye, > Peter

[edit] Meycauayan, Bulacan locator map...

...has a misspelling. Hope you can fix it up, but no hurry. :) --seav 17:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Fixed! Nice catch... Coffee 02:20, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Star Wars - Cast List

(Discussion continued from User_talk:Adamwankenobi)

However, being a frequent conributor to these articles, not to mention working on the cast lists, I don't want to see my edits reverted to what I see as incomplete. I don't to see them changed by people who clearly have no interest in the content of the articles (A Link to the Past), who are instead interested in making the articles like all the others on the site. Adamwankenobi 20:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, nothing more horrible than trying to make the Star Wars articles GOOD. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:38, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

for deleting that stupid article I listed at Vfd. Image:Barnstar2.png, I am Dbraceyrules, by the way, just changed the user name. V. Molotov 22:10, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks... I'm enjoying my new admin powers. *pounds delete button furiously* --Coffee 22:15, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
LOL.—Encephalon | ζ  13:56:42, 2005-08-31 (UTC)

[edit] Star Wars categories

I didn't do such thing. Copperchair 07:21, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits do not make sense

  • Do not add the tagline, awards, and ratings fields to the movie templates on Star Wars film articles. They are not part of the template, and are not displayed. They only serve to clutter the wikicode with information that no one will see.

All right.

  • Do not change the category from "Star Wars episodes" to "Star Wars films". The episodes category is a subcategory of films, and better organized.

But I like the name of the Episode in the category better.

  • Do not change the {{Star Wars episodes}} template into {{Starwars}}. The new template is smaller and gives more information.

All right, but the "Starwars episodes" template currently doesn't appear in the article of "A New Hope". Copperchair 07:37, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ROTJ Poster

I believe the 2004 DVD shows the poster as the official poster. I wasn't the person who put it there, by the way, I put it back in, however when A Link to the Past reoved it. I'll check. Adamwankenobi 06:09, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

I believe, though, on the "posters" section on the bonus disc, the caption says that the one I had on there was the original theatrical poster. Adamwankenobi 06:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Both of the posters were syle A, according to the DVD. Would this have any significance? Do you know which was released first? I think we should use the one that was released first. Adamwankenobi 07:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/h/e/User_talk%7ETheCoffee_Archive_1_0833.html"