User talk:TheBigDirtyBastard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to Livejournal in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information.
--Veinor (ヴエノル(talk)) 23:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
|
Contents |
[edit] St. Eunan's College
Please read WP:RS, and verify that "St. Eunan's College Annual" qualifies. Demiurge 16:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes I have read it. It does qualify. Thanks.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheBigDirtyBastard (talk • contribs).
- Actually, it seems to be a self-published source, so it doesn't. Demiurge 16:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It isn't self-published, the town/county council published it.
- Make up your mind, was it the school or the council who published it? A student-written self-publication doesn't count as a reliable source. Also how would the annual include an event that only happened on the 13th? Demiurge 16:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Right I will explain. The event happened on the 13th the college annual report was released by the county council 3 days later as they were concerned with the safety of the students attending the school.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheBigDirtyBastard (talk • contribs).
- The story changes again! So it's a council safety report, not a school annual now? Is it available online? Is there press coverage of the incident? (if it was serious enough for the council to investigate it and release a report, it should have been in the news). Demiurge 16:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, It is the St. Eunans College Annual Report. I forgot to put in report . It isn't available online. It wasn't on the news as the College is in County Donegal and as you may know the Irish government don't care much for the north west of the country. The council have decided to stop begging for money for renovations as the Irish Government never listen. Therefore the report was only released locally.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheBigDirtyBastard (talk • contribs).
- How convenient. Why wasn't it covered in local media? Demiurge 16:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Which local media were you looking at? Obviously not the same one I was.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheBigDirtyBastard (talk • contribs).
- So if it was covered in the local media, provide references please. Demiurge 17:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
It was mentioned on Highland Radio earlier in the week if you must know.
[edit] Username
Your username is inappropriate because it may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization, website or non-Latin characters, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. Wikipedia:Username provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.
If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions: You will have 24 hours to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account.
[edit] I'AM NOT IMPRESSED
You are an innapropiate Vandal to Wikipedia, with a terrible username, and by your contributions have nothing better to do but vandalise pages. I'm going to be keeping an Eye on you... Galactian 16:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC) 16:57 on the 19th November 2006
[edit] Blocked
You did not file a request to change your username, in 24 hours, thus it is now blocked.
Your username has been blocked indefinitely because it may be rude or inflammatory, unnecessarily long/confusing, too similar to an existing user, contains the name of an organization, website or non-Latin characters, or is otherwise inappropriate (see our blocking and username policies for more information). You are encouraged to create a new account and contribute to Wikipedia under a more appropriate username, and in a constructive manner. Wikipedia:Username provides guidance on selecting an appropriate username. You may also edit Wikipedia without creating an account. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia under an inappropriate username. If you would like to discuss the block, you may appeal on your talk page or email the administrator who blocked you.
Due to Wikipedia's mechanism for enforcing name changes, your IP address may be temporarily blocked. Unless you have also been engaging in vandalism or impersonation of another user, we will remove that block as soon as possible — if this doesn't happen within an hour or so, please email an administrator and explain the situation (see the list of administrators).
If you want to keep the contributions from your old account for your new username, please follow these directions: (1) Add {{unblock-un|new username}} to your user talk page. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can still edit your own talk page. (2) Soon, an admin may come to unblock you. (3) You will have 24 hours after the unblock to file a request on Wikipedia:Changing username before you may be re-blocked. Note that this can only be done before you create the new one. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username. In many cases (especially if your account has few or no edits), it is a lot easier to create a new account.
