User:The Man in Question

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(everything following the following parenthesis is the copyrighted material of A. Pow, ©2006, except certain names which belong to their copyright holders)

Hi, this is probably the man in question1 writing, unless it isn't, in which case it is some other man who is not under question, which is lucky for him, since the man in question seems to be constantly under questions — primarily the following questions:

1. Q: What kind of a stupid name is "The Man in Question"?

(A: Well, you answered your own question by saying that it's stupid, but I'll add that it's also English, stemming from Anglo-Saxon and Latin)

2. Q: If you're a man of integrity, then why do you constantly have people complaining to you on your talk page?

(A: One, I never said I was a man of integrity, and two, ask the complainers, not me.)


PS: I try to be a man of integrity, but I seem to always end up becoming the man in question.
PPS: At the bottom of this page you will find a short biography of the man in question.

Contents

[edit] "My" Pages

PPPS: Since this is my page, I'll add a few of the pages that I've created/greatly expanded (i.e., made it what it is today), so that you can see what an awful writer I apparantly am:

MYTHOLOGY: Purportedly, the lucubration2 of götterdämmerungs3, et cætera.

LEMONY SNICKET: A litterateur4 whose appellation5 is, in the plenitude6 of its sooth7, Daniel Handler.

JUNGLE JAM: A radio show8


PPPPS: I've created many more articles unworthy of note, which I will not include.

[edit] "My" Images (Which Are Mostly Brett Helquist's Images)

This user is a writer.


This user has an excellent image scanner.

This user likes to make maps and diagrams.

This user likes to research.

This user likes history.

This user is male.


500 This user has more than 500 edits on the English Wikipedia.

This user likes mythology and folklore.

This user is a Christian.

This user is of German and Jewish descent.


This user is Irish.

My biggest contribution to the Wikipedia has been pictures, primarily for the articles. The following is a list of those I can remember (the main picture unless otherwise specified):

[edit] Biography

The man in question was born in a state that's name is spelled with either 9 or 10 letters, depending on whether or not it is spelled correctly. No tolling of carillons was heard at his birth, unlike Adolf Hitler'sa. He was born and raised in a smallish house, and it might interest you that it was neither blue nor plaidb. I write that he was a gifted child, but this statement (quite strange in its vogue), though a generally accepted fact (about which books have been written and re-written), has been debated equal times as Horton Kaisura has received perfect marks on tests (which is well nigh saying something). When he reached the age which is, but was not always, generally accepted in most scholarly circles (not then — now, mind you) as the square root of all evilc, he first learned to do what he does most commonly (and might never do again, after a certain dated), aside from the NOT THREEe, but four things which frequent his time. The knelling of carillons will not mark his funeral, but rather their conspicuous lack. You might notice this event, if you aren't too buisy trying to de-code the message some liars claim is hidden in this page.


PPPPPS: Everyone who has has ever told a lie is a liar, to some extent.

What is my philosophy?

Clothes are for wearing.
This user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgements About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are In Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They are Deletionist
AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD

The motto of the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD is Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet, which translates to "it is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia." This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.


[edit] Notes

1man in question, the: a contingent litterateur and piecemeal cryptographer/diesinker.
2lucubration: moilsome cogitation.
3götterdämmerung: the crepuscule of the demiurges.
4litterateur: someone who expatiates his codified crescence.
5appellation: an appellative epithet by which someone is contradistinguished from the allogeneous admass.
6plenitude: in the plenipotentiary inanimation of Abundantia.
7sooth: the caliber partaken by something which is unfeigned.
8radio show: a show on the radio.

aI am told that every biography should begin with the country and date of birth if possible.
bIt wasn't white, either.
c8.5
dThis date can be found by: (the number of words in this page that were written by me) x ([the square root of the phrase, “the world is quiet here”] ÷ [3 plus the square root of all evil squared in percent form] square rooted).

(at least, I think so; as a side note, this does not refer to anything suicidal, but merely suggests that I will be dead by this date).

eSome people refuse to acknowledge the S-word as one of the time wasting activities.

PS: The S-word does not refer to the word that you're probably thinking of. If you weren't thinking of anything, then you can click here to learn the word, though I advise you to not do so.
PPS: Numeric numbers (i.e., 42, 8.5, ©2006) only count as one word. This does not include anything written like this, which does not count.
PPPS: PS is two words.
PPPPS: Minus 16 for good measure.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../t/h/e/User%7EThe_Man_in_Question_4440.html"