Theaetetus (dialogue)

The Theætetus (Θεαιτητος) is one of Plato's great dialogs concerning the nature of knowledge. The framing of the dialog begins when Euclides tells his friend Terpsion that he wrote a book many years ago based on what Socrates told him of a conversation he had with Theaetetus when he was quite a young man. The occasion for the telling is that Euclides has seen Theaetetus being carried off the battlefield with a case of dysentary and a minor war wound. Euclides says that Socrates correctly prophesied that Theaetetus would become a notable man if he lived long enough. The dialog is read aloud to the two men by a slave boy in the employ of Euclides.

The discussion between Socrates and the young Theaetetus reveals Plato's theory of knowledge. Throughout the course of the dialauge, Socrates and his interlocutor Theateatus discuss three specific definitions of knowledge; that knowledge is perception, that knowledge is true judgment and finally that knowledge is a true judgment with an account. Throughout the discourse, each of these definitions is shown to be a failure in terms of its logical construction. As well, the defenitions are shown to be failures because they are overly emperical, such that they deny the acctual essense of knoweledge (what knowledge is). The conversation ends with Socrates' announcement that he has to go to court to answer to the charges that he has been corrupting the young and failing to worship Athenian Gods.

1 Midwife to boys
2 Philosophical labor
3 Examining the offspring
4 Abusing the "orphan" of Protagoras
5 The absent-minded philosopher
6 The men of flux
7 The mind as a bird cage
8 Rhetorical structure
9 Significant references in the dialogue
10 Footnotes
11 Selected secondary literature
12 External links

[edit] Midwife to boys

Socrates asks Theodorus, who inittaly greets Socrates, if he knows of any geometry students who show particular promise, and Theodorus assures him that he does. He tells Socrates he does not want to over-praise the boy, lest anyone suspect he is in love with him. He says that Theaetetus is a young Socrates look-alike, rather homely, with a snub-nose and protruding eyes. The two older men spot the boy rubbing himself down with oil, and Theodorus reviews the facts about him, that he is intelligent, virile, and an orphan whose inheritance has been squandered by trustees.

Socrates tells Theaetetus that he cannot make out what knowledge is, and is looking for a simple formula for it. Theaetetus says he really has no idea how to answer the question, and Socrates tells him that he is there to help. Socrates says he has modelled his career after his midwife mother. She delivered babies and for his part, Socrates can tell when a young man is in the throes of trying to give birth to a thought. Socrates says his work is especially difficult because he himself is barren, and as it turns out, all the bastard notions he has helped deliver had to be killed (152b,c). Theaetetus ventures that "knowledge is nothing but sense perception".

[edit] Philosophical labor

Socrates thinks that this idea must be identical in meaning, if not in actual words, to Protagoras' famous maxim "Man is the measure of all things." Socrates wrestles to conflate the two ideas, and stirs in for good measure some nonsense about Homer being the captain of a team of flux theorists. Socrates dictates a complete textbook of logical fallacies to the bewildered Theaetetus. When Socrates tells the child that he (Socrates) will be taller in a year's time without gaining an inch because Theaetetus will have grown relative to him, the child complains of dizziness (155c). In an oft quoted line, Socrates says with delight that "wonder (thaumazein) belongs to the philosopher". He admonishes the boy to be patient and bear with his questions, so that his hidden beliefs may be yanked out into the bright light of day.

[edit] Examining the offspring

When Socrates sums up what they have agreed on so far, that knowledge is indeed perception, and that this idea is co-incidental with the doctrine of Homer and Heraclitus and all their tribe, and is the same thing, too, as the doctrine of Protagoras (160d), he asks Theaetetus if this is not his own child. Theaetetus agrees that this was his idea, and agrees to let Socrates check to see if it is too stupid to be allowed to live ("a lifeless phantom not worth rearing"). Socrates then proceeds to torture the maxim of Protagoras into beastly and divine applications. Socrates admits that it is unfortunate that Protagoras is dead and cannot defend his idea against people such as himself. He says that the two of them are "trampling on his orphan". (164e)

[edit] Abusing the "orphan" of Protagoras

Since Protagoras is absent from the debate and is in any case deceased, Socrates puts himself in the sophist's shoes and tries to do him the favor of defending his idea (166a-168c). Socrates continues to find more ways to misinterpret and misrepresent him - "mistreat his orphan". Putting words in the dead sophist's mouth, Socrates declares that Protagoras asserts with his maxim that all things are in motion and whatever seems to be the case, is the case for the perceiver, whether the individual or the state.

At the end of his speech, Socrates admits to Theodorus that if Protagoras were alive to defend his idea, he would have done a far better job than Socrates has just done. Theodorus tells Socrates that he must be kidding, that he has come to the task with boyish vigor. Theodorus does not claim to be a disciple of Protagoras, but never contradicts Socrates repeated assertions that he is a friend of Protagoras. Socrates admits he has used the child's timidity to aid him in his argument against the doctrine of Protagoras (168d).

Socrates not at all certain that he has not misrepresented Protagoras in making each man the measure of his own wisdom. He presses Theodorus on the question of whether any follower of Protagoras (himself included) would contend that nobody thinks anyone else is wrong (170c). Theodorus proves to be helpless against Socrates confusions. He agrees that Protagoras concedes that those who disagree with him are correct (171a). In making Protagoras a complete epistemological relativist, where every person's individual perceptions are his reality and his truth, both Socrates and Theodorus paint Protagoras as maintaining an absurd position. Socrates says that if Protagoras could pop his head up through the ground as far as his neck, he would expose Socrates as a speaker of nonsense and sink out of sight and take to his heels (171d)

[edit] The absent-minded philosopher

Socrates then proceeds to explain why philosophers seem clumsy and stupid to the common lot of humanity. Socrates explains that philosophers are open to mockery because they are not concerned about what interests most people: they could not care less about the scandals in their neighbors house, the tracing of one's ancestry to Heracles, and so on. It is here that Socrates draws the classic portrait of the absent-minded intellectual who cannot make his bed, cook a meal, or drape his cloak like a gentleman (175e). Socrates adds a big bifurcation to this speech, saying that there are only two kinds of lives to be lived: a divinely happy one, lived by righteous philosophers or a godless, miserable one, such as most people live (176-177). Socrates admits this was a digression that threatens to drown his original project, which was to define knowledge. Theodorus, the old geometer, tells Socrates that he finds this sort of thing easier to follow than his earlier arguments.

[edit] The men of flux

Socrates says that the men of flux, like Homer and Heraclitus, are really hard to talk to because you can't pin them down. When you ask them a question, he says, they pluck from their quiver a little aphorism to let fly at you, and as you try to figure that one out, they wing another one at you. They leave nothing settled either in discourse, or in their own minds. Socrates adds that the opposite school of thought, that teaches of the "immovable whole" is just as hard to talk to (181a,b). Socrates says he met the father of the idea, Parmenides, when he was quite young but does not want to get into another digression over it.

[edit] The mind as a bird cage

Perhaps the most delightful talk in the dialog comes near the end, when Socrates compares the human mind to a bird cage. He says it is one thing to possess knowledge and another to have it about one, on hand, as it were (199a). Socrates says that as a man goes hunting about in his brain for knowledge of something, he might grab hold of the wrong thing. He says that mistaking eleven for twelve is like going in for a pigeon and coming up with a dove (199b). Theaetetus joins in the game, and says that to complete the picture, you need to envision pieces of ignorance flying around in there with the birds. Socrates concludes the dialog by announcing that all the two have produced is mere "wind-eggs" and that he must be getting on now to the courthouse.

[edit] Rhetorical structure

This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details.

Plato uses a parallel analogy in the dialog to make the point that Socrates is a confused thinker who imposes his confusion on his disciples. The title character, Theaetetus, is an orphan child who has no father to protect him, and whose inheritance has been squandered. Similarly, Theodorus functions as a reluctant/ indifferent/incapable guardian of the intellectual legacy of Protagoras. He allows that he is a friend of late sophist, and yet permits Socrates to trample on his famous maxim, "Man is the measure of all things." Socrates is aware that he is misinterpreting the idea of Protagoras, but seems incapable of doing it justice. In the dialogue Protagoras, Socrates has a lengthy conversation with the famed sophist, and it is therefore all the more puzzling that Socrates cannot make heads or tails of his philosophy.

[edit] Significant references in the dialogue

In this dialogue, Socrates refers to Epicharmus of Kos as "the prince of Comedy" and Homer as "the prince of Tragedy", and both as "great masters of either kind of poetry".¹ This is significant because it is one of the very few extant references in greater antiquity (Fourth century BC) to Epicharmus and his work. Another reference is in Plato's Gorgias dialogue.

[edit] Footnotes

¹ "Summon the great masters of either kind of poetry- Epicharmus, the prince of Comedy, and Homer of Tragedy", Theaetetus, by Plato, section §152e. [1] (translation by Benjamin Jowett [2]). There is some variability in translation of the passage. Words like "king", "chief", "leader", "master" are used in the place of "prince" in different translations. The basic Greek word in Plato is "akroi" from "akros" meaning topmost or high up. In this context it means "of a degree highest of its kind" or "consummate" (cf. Liddell & Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon). [3]

[edit] Selected secondary literature

Benardete, S., Commentary to Plato's Theaetetus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
Burnyeat, M.F., The Theaetetus of Plato (with a translation by Jane Levett). Hackett, 1990.
Campbell, L., The Theaetetus of Plato. Oxford University Press, 1883.
Heidegger, M., The Essence of Truth. Continuum, 2002.