Talk:The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Tarbosaurus vs Ankylosaurus
Who will win? I'm guessing Ankylosaurus.61.230.78.58 02:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Screenshots
Here are some VERY GOOD screenshots: [1] Can't understand the text though, it's in another language. 61.230.90.241 06:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Akylosaurus?
I recently visited the BBC's official site on TTAKD [2] and they display it as an "ankylosaur". Also I was under the impression that Akylosaurus was a North American dinosaur, not mongolian. the gallery on the site shows a creature too small to be A. magniventris. could anyone verify this?_Dragon Helm 02:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Statistics
Hi - it seems that some 'bald' statements are made here, as if fact, yet there has been some pretty heavy debating over at Tyrannosaurus. Latest thinking on 'bite force' and 'speed' of this theropod may not be accurately reported here. - Ballista 05:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Validity and Usefulness?
To be frank, this programs sounds idiotic. Of what use is the information that a T. rex with a steel skull could "crush a car?" T. rex did not have a steel skull, there were no cars in Late Cretaceous North America, and even if there were, T. rex would have obtained no benefit from running around crushing them.
Likewise, what value is the information that a Triceratops with a resin skull would not be able to charge predators, as its skull would shatter? Few Triceratops were likely to have had resin skulls.
These "who will win?" match-ups are strictly for power-obsessed teenaged boys, and so sound more like something for MTV than a program purporting to be scientific.
Hmmm, you have a point... Dora Nichov 23:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
